Why?
I’ve said this before, have you even bothered to read what Auriemna’s has said multiple times for two years what Muhl, and frankly, she alone, brings to the team? Did you notice how aggressively she pushed the ball last night, and then listened to Dailey‘s post game comments about wanting to get good shots before the defense can get set up? Have you noticed who does the vast majority of talking in the player huddles on the court? Do you notice the veteran players paying attention? Have you noticed who most frequently is called to the sideline for communications with Auriemma, and last night with Dailey? All the players you listed above have pure offensive basketball skills superior to Muhl, no question, but……………
read olddude’s post on this thread regarding the disruption Muhl caused to Creighton‘s offensive continuity last night fighting over picks and switching constantly and seamlessly at the top of the defense. Creighton scored 20 points in the middle two quarters when Uconn erased the Creighton lead and took command of the game and Muhl was a huge part of that defensive domination.
She also had five rebounds and five assists and lost at least two more with excellent passes, one to Ono in the post and one to Williams cutting to the basket where they both got fouled and made all 4 foul shots. She had no turnovers.
I call it as I see it and shared that she played very poorly against Providence and she rightly got very limited minutes but IMO she played an outstanding game last night. She didn’t score, but again, my opinion, she had more of an impact on the game than any Uconn player outside of Ono.
I don’t mean to be rude or condescending but there is much more to the game than watching the ball and shooting, much more. In a world of highlight reel adoration and judging players solely or primarily on points scored, Muhl is just not that kind of player. IMO, it’s a good thing for Uconn, Auriemma and Dailey certainly know the game far better than that.