Wish it were the Lakers/Sacto pick. But can't include Tatum.Done deal. IT, Crowder, Zizic and the 2018 nets pick
The Nets pick should be the issue to you. Its going to be a top 4 pick. Who cares about the rest. That pick shouldn't have been included.IT isn't worth max money. Crowder is replaceable. They have a lottery pick coming up.
If Irving is healthy--and that's the obvious danger!--then an Irving-Haywood-Tatum-Brown core is really good. It's the Nets pick that's the issue to me. Give up the Lakers/Clippers/anything else...
The Nets pick should be the issue to you. Its going to be a top 4 pick. Who cares about the rest. That pick shouldn't have been included.
It may or may not be. But they do have another Lotto pick, and IT was about to become a long term problem for the team. I honestly didn't want him to be in a long term contract for the Celtics. Now they get Irving instead?The Nets pick should be the issue to you. Its going to be a top 4 pick. Who cares about the rest. That pick shouldn't have been included.
You got a slightly better IT for IT Crowder and a top 5 pick in a super top loaded draft next year. Irving is barley an upgrade over Thomas.Ha, is this a joke?
If you think this is a bad trade for your Boston you are brain dead.
The Nets picks could be a stud or could be a dud. Lot of questions in the upcoming draft class. Promise you none of them are better players than KyrieBingo.
The Nets picks could be a stud or could be a dud. Lot of questions in the upcoming draft class. Promise you none of them are better players than Kyrie
The fact you think that Irving is barely an upgrade over Thomas tells me all I need to know about your opinion. That statement is laughably stupid.You got a slightly better IT for IT Crowder and a top 5 pick in a super top loaded draft next year. Irving is barley an upgrade over Thomas.
You like this deal because your GM sucks at drafting?Irving may be one of the top 7 players in the league and is 25. Yes Celts gave up some pieces but as one mentioned IT is not worth max and Crowder is replaceable. So you can look at it as giving up a potential no1 pick for Irving - that's a no brainer.
And by the way Ainge's draft pick record - eh not so hot. I like Boston in this one.
Irving may be one of the top 7 players in the league and is 25. Yes Celts gave up some pieces but as one mentioned IT is not worth max and Crowder is replaceable. So you can look at it as giving up a potential no1 pick for Irving - that's a no brainer.
And by the way Ainge's draft pick record - eh not so hot. I like Boston in this one.
What besides defense does Irving do better than Thomas?The fact you think that Irving is barely an upgrade over Thomas tells me all I need to know about your opinion. That statement is laughably stupid.
You don't deal a young star to your rival
Yeah, I like IT a lot. A fun player. But Irving >>> Thomas. It isn't actually close.The fact you think that Irving is barely an upgrade over Thomas tells me all I need to know about your opinion. That statement is laughably stupid.
You serious? I mean really?What besides defense does Irving do better than Thomas?
So there is a guy you would bet on being going to 4 All star games in their first 6 years, win Rookie of the year, a title, all star game MVP, and average 24 and 5 while shooting 46% from the field in 51 playoff games?i'll take that bet.
Irving is better than Thomas, but a top 5 pick better? Plus throwing in two solid role players, without the guarantee if he'll resign?You serious? I mean really?
IT has been a good player in this league for 2 years, Kyrie has been an All Star since his 2nd year. Kyrie is 3 years younger, signed for 3 years,
One is a 30% 3 point shooter in the playoffs and one is over 40%.
I can go on and on but honestly anyone with a brain knows the two players are not close
You know what the best part is? Kyrie is signed for 3 more years, IT is signed for 1.You know the best part? Irving might not re-sign with Boston.