intlzncster
i fart in your general direction
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 28,910
- Reaction Score
- 60,188
That's my question also. And if the trial shows so many schools were offering money and the NCAA does nothing about it then you might as well throw out the whole NCAA model and start over.The question for me is, are any of these schools even going to get punished? Or will the NCAA simply sweep under the rug and say there was too much corruption to individually punish. "We've rooted it out now". Which is BS.
That's my question also. And if the trial shows so many schools were offering money and the NCAA does nothing about it then you might as well throw out the whole NCAA model and start over.
Wow, I would have loved to be on that jury. Although I'm not sure I would want to be a juror on a trial that is going to last weeks.I was in the room yesterday as a potential juror. For obvious reasons I was not picked
I was in the room yesterday as a potential juror. For obvious reasons I was not picked
During opening statements Tuesday, attorneys for a former Adidas executive did not deny he conspired to or made payments to the families of high-profile basketball recruits.
"NCAA rules were broken," attorney Casey Donnelly told the jury. "We are not going to waste your time pretending these families did not get funds."
Attorneys: Ex-Adidas exec didn't break laws
James Gatto is not disputing that money changed hands. So now that that's out of the way what does the NCAA do? This is going to be very interesting.
Uh, what about the claims they appropriated those cash payments to bogus expenses accounting wise? Isn't that laundering, wire-fraud, or something like that?
That's my question also. And if the trial shows so many schools were offering money and the NCAA does nothing about it then you might as well throw out the whole NCAA model and start over.
Well if the NCAA is saying it's O.K. to pay recruits with no retribution then doesn't that change the whole model? Opens up a huge can of worms. Do you then put schools in 2 categories - one that wants to pay recruits and another that doesn't?How is this fair to the schools that played by the rules though?
Well if the NCAA is saying it's O.K. to pay recruits with no retribution then doesn't that change the whole model? Opens up a huge can of worms. Do you then put schools in 2 categories - one that wants to pay recruits and another that doesn't?
Well if the NCAA is saying it's O.K. to pay recruits with no retribution then doesn't that change the whole model? Opens up a huge can of worms. Do you then put schools in 2 categories - one that wants to pay recruits and another that doesn't?
Judge mulling whether to allow Louisville escort scandal in college hoops corruption trial
>>You know a college basketball fraud trial is going well when, in trying to hash out what is and isn’t going to be admissible evidence, a federal judge states the following sentence in open court.
“So the rent-a-cops were in the dorm when the hookers were brought in …”<<
Brian Bowen Sr. may testify Thursday, what he says could rock college basketball
If people are shocked by now they really haven't been paying attention lately, never mind for the past few decades.
Based off everything we know so far, I’m guessing this will implicate Miami and Arizona hard. Let’s start reaching out to Nico Mannion and Brandon Williams...
I see no discrepancy. The cars don’t get the payment when they are bought, the dealership does. They are treated as commodities by all involved, including by the NCAA.Will never not amaze me how these players are treated at every step of the system - formally and informally - as commodities, but the NCAA insists that they are amateurs and cannot be paid.