- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 745
- Reaction Score
- 1,829
Have you been drinking ?To be honest, I was expecting worse. I think we will be competitive with Holy Cross. I am looking forward to a game that we have a chance to win.
Have you been drinking ?To be honest, I was expecting worse. I think we will be competitive with Holy Cross. I am looking forward to a game that we have a chance to win.
When you eliminate the impossible whatever is left, no matter how unlikely, is the answer. No sane head coach would have started this kid, unless HCRE2.0 is looking for a clone of his former self as a never used reserve college QB playing for the Fruit. FruitRE1.0 had not talent, not ability to pass, but boy could he manage the huddle (at least in practice). That's what he values.So.....we knew that two years ago. There were lots of excuses why he wasn't prepared for the college game. Two years later...he still is innacurate.
And...he won the starting job. Is he really the best we have ? And if so...why didn't they look at the transfer wire?
It's so weird that edsall was a QB and it feels like it's the position he has his worse judgement.
Even on short throws he's not putting the ball where it needs to be to keep the receivers' momentum going.Jack Zergiotis showed that he can’t throw accurately more than 10 yards downfield. For an offense that’s already limited, that’s a killer. There were wide open WRs on deep routes that he wasn’t close to hitting. Major, major problem going forward.
Dehydration played a factor for some of the players .. 120 on the turf and there were people sick from the heat in the stands. It was hot and miserable today.No one with heat stroke, as far as we know.
I was going to say the same thing. It was 120 on the field. It was hot. People were taken by ambulance who were in the stands. Imagine how the field felt.Guys, let’s keep it real. Even though we prepared for two years let’s call it how it is- traditionally it’s tougher for offenses to get acclimated and defenses are usually ahead. A lot of the guys that played today on offense (skill players) was their first rodeo. Fresno played in the Fall both offensively and defensively.
Sure I wanted a more competitive game and it sucks to lose. But this was a tall task from the jump given the elements and adversity they faced.
What I did see was better LB and DB play- rallying to the football and getting the defense off the field on 3rd down- in the first qtr. That wasn’t a fluke at all. Calm down and let’s see how the first 3-4 games go before we reserve judgment
Hornet, Fresno State is a mediocre FBS squad. Both teams played in the same heat. We aren’t even close to average including taking one year off which was the best thing possible for the team according to our football guru. I’ll give you rust is a factor, but this is literally more of the same with a staff that simply can’t get it done. It’s pathetic at this point. Winning Holy Cross validates we are competitive FCS program, but it proves nothing at an FBS level . The solution is clean house.No you’re giving credit to a defense that was playing horrible. It’s called being a realest, I’m far from crying. If you want to be delusional to feel better that’s fine, you’re entitled to that.
A little bit of both sarcasm and serious comment. I think I predicted two wins this year with the comment that was my prediction until we have data that shows otherwise. So nothing that we have seen so far changes that. It is in that sense relative to my prediction that they are right on track.I can't tell what is and isn't sarcasm anymore. Do you think 2 wins this year would make us "on track?"
Do they not have misting fans and AC on the sideline? We have had plenty of really muggy hot weather in CT to get acclimated to that.Dehydration played a factor for some of the players .. 120 on the turf and there were people sick from the heat in the stands. It was hot and miserable today.
My question is, what did he see in Zerg vs Steven Krajewski? Could Steven Krajewski have been in the doghouse for some reason?There is one. Jack G. was massively disappointing. When he had trouble handing the ball off the first play of the game, knew he wasn’t in right mental state to lead the team.
Biggest issues is he misses guys left and right and doesn’t deliver balls where our receivers can fight for yardage. And honestly, just not a good tight spiral - hard for receivers.
While we are one game in, Krajewski looked like big, confident and delivered the rock. Yes, has missed a coupe throws but he looked far more in command of the offense. If it turns out he is our starter, got to put the decision to start Jack G today on the coaches.
While there is some negative in this post - it’s mostly positive.
This is where I am. I did not expect to win but 45-0 hit me like a ton of bricks. Did not expect the offense to look like it regressed after almost two years of maturation. I was worried about the OLine and I was right. However, the "glass half full" me hopes it was the heat, hopes it was Fresno proves to be good this year, hopes it was the shoes, hopes they learn and get better quickly. I will see with my own two eyes next Saturday vs. HC. If we don't dominate them, um, "yikes" just about covers it.We looked competitive in Q1 when the offense was terrible as opposed to historically bad. Nobody in their right mind expected a win. Win next week and we are right where we expected. I think every poster here would like to have (And expected to) look better than we did yesterday, but it is what it is. Fresno is solid - not a NY6 contender - but a solid 6 or 7 win team. Going into the season we expected UConn to be bad and clearly we still are. Thing is, we play a lot of bad teams. Two FCS teams. MTSU and UMass are among the worst (With UConn) at the G5/Indy level. Progress is 3-9 or 4-8 while looking better than the teams that are below us and we can still show that. Yesterday was discouraging, but I'm withholding judgment on the season & RE until we see what happens with Holy Cross. I'm not expecting 56-0 but if we get something like 14-12... then yes, yikes.
If they don't beat Holy Cross handily I'll be worried about the results for the season
FWIW, Bulldog fan here, and wanted to comment on this. This game time can be blamed on CBS Sports and their need to fit a game into a specific time slot. This is normal weather for this time of year in Fresno. That is why all home games have historically been night games (7pm or later), at least early in the season. The last time a non-night game was held in these kind of conditions was against Colorado in 2012. That was at 5pm instead of 7pm. The result? Fresno won 69-14. That was also due to CBS Sports needing to fit a game into a time slot.Dehydration played a factor for some of the players .. 120 on the turf and there were people sick from the heat in the stands. It was hot and miserable today.
I didn’t watch the the game but it sounded horrible on the radio. Glad there were some positives. This performance is a least partially because they did not play against better competition last year. A whole year without full contact. Hope they can get it together in the next couple of games.Randy’s plan was good, the players didn’t execute.
FS is a very good team. The problem is not RE, he has already proven that he can win here. The problem is we have dropped down a level by leaving the AAC. Recruiting has gone down as a result.
UMASS had WhippleFresno expects to be good this year and had 20 out of 22 starters back. We will see how it plays out for them. Not scoring is what makes this so disappointing. Not being close enough to try a field goal. Without better QB play the HCRE will be fired. UMass played some big programs a few years back and they could score despite the beatdown. This ongoing QB problem has to get solved. Our o-line blocking schemes in the run game are an issue as our players can not execute them against a decent defense. Everything takes too long to develop. With no run game we were sunk. HC will tell us if any progress has been made. Winning by 2 touchdowns is not enough progress in my mind. Progress would be 38-10 UConn.