Herd immunity is just not going to happen, unfortunately.
And your source?
Herd immunity is just not going to happen, unfortunately.
The USA. A first world country without colleges.
If you are going to use a number at least do the math correctly. According to worldometer Denmark had 533 deaths and Finland had 284. That’s 817. 7x that is 5719. Worldometer shows Sweden with 3460 deaths. You’re off by 1.75x but never let facts get in the way. They conceded they did not properly safeguard their senior living places that account for over 50% of deaths. If u look at the general populace mortality it’s about 1700 or 2x Finland and Denmark. Let’s see what happens in July as they expect herd immunity in June.

What do you think exactly is going to happen between now and then? A vaccine? Jesus doing resurrection 2 and touching us all on the shoulder and healing us?I understand why California wud cancel fall sports but why make the decision this early? Why not wait another month till mid June? Why the burning rush to call it so fast? Does fall semester start in late July out there? Or they just trying to be the first ones? Extra strange when u take into account that just a couple weeks ago Cali was talking about reopening public schools in July. So weird
What does a vaccine have to do with it? We may never have a vaccine.What do you think exactly is going to happen between now and then? A vaccine? Jesus doing resurrection 2 and touching us all on the shoulder and healing us?
either of the above by the fall would be great.
Neither is happening.
Nope we may not. But you can’t rush herd immunity without unneedingly sacrificing lives either.What does a vaccine have to do with it? We may never have a vaccine.
Geezus, be better than that.Nope we may not. But you can’t rush herd immunity without unneedingly sacrificing lives either.
I get your trips to the gym and hoisting beer at a football game are vital to you.
playing music is vital to me.
but .....
priorities my friend
Than what?Geezus, be better than that.
What do you think exactly is going to happen between now and then? A vaccine? Jesus doing resurrection 2 and touching us all on the shoulder and healing us?
Just some facts.
1-SARS simply disappeared as the seasons changed. Why do you think there is a "flu" season. Weather affects viruses.
2-There is money to be made. Remdesivir looks to be lame. However, almost every major pharma player has folks working on treatments which would be a windfall. At least 75 are in the pipeline. Only one has to work.
3-Testing is increasing exponentially. As surveillance testing becomes more widely available political decision makers will be able adjust their state re-openings based on better data.
4-Coutries all over the world (and states here at home) are re-opening at different rates and with different precautions. These experiences will inform decision makers on does and don't and could cause some to change course.
5-I hope you have a lightning rod on your home. Touching one on the shoulder isn't Jesus's only option.
What are you talking about? That's not where we are. Businesses aren't open, they're going out of business all over the place.Than what?
stores should be open. People should be going back to work. All with social distancing practices and masks. That’s where we are.
you leaving your sweat on a bench press or me spraying the front row with saliva while I sing in a crowded indoor bar is the height of stupidity. I know you’re not that stupid.
you think you going to see 100k in an arbor for Michigan Ohio state this fall? Guess again, chumley.
Point being, mom and pop shops and non essential businesses should be open. I believe that. And I believe they will be over the next 6 weeks.What are you talking about? That's not where we are. Businesses aren't open, they're going out of business all over the place.
Break it down.I still have no clue what your vaccine comment means.
So no school or sports for years?Break it down.
There will be no “ normal “ until a vaccine. It’s that simple. Mass gatherings and businesses where it’s impossible to practice social distancing are screwed.. it’s sad, but it’s true.
Maybe.So no school or sports for years?
Supreme Court of Wisconsin just struck down the stay at home order from the Governor, all restaurants and bars can open immediately.
It's pretty obvious this was always going to happen around the country.
I agree that fall sports cud start Jan 1 coinciding with College hoops. They re saying nfl starting Columbus Day weekend , nba beginning July 4 weekend with a couple exhibition games then right into playoffs which will conclude around Labor Day weekend. So yes I understand , just think jumping gun on May 10th is a month too early. That’s all. Obviously no one knows what’s going on. Just a huge messThe NBA and MLB have both stated they need a month of warm up activities to prevent injuries and get back in shape, and that isn't football. Besides for at least a month now, people have been speculating about having fall sports start after the new year.
The chain of payments is kept in tact in Denmark. Everyone can buy food, everyone can pay the rent, landlords can collect rent, banks can collect on loans, no one loses their job, companies meet payrolls despite shortfalls in sales.
I heard late June just last week but since people r announcing things already this will definitely push up that date as everyone goes into a panicky rush to make sure they were “proactive”.Early June is the deadline for all schools to decide.
But it was always going to happen. It's why our lockdown was never tenable. I always expected the shutdown to be until June 1st. You don't shut things down and pick winners and losers (all big box stores stay open and get money, mom and pops shutdown and get shafted.)it’s a bold move, cotton. Let’s see if it pays off.
Hope it does. Many won’t open. ( see Georgia) and the fear right now is too fresh.
I don’t have their testing info. The trouble with acceptable compromises is they they are acceptable usually to people not directly impacted by the illness. I don’t think Sweden mandated work, not sure, but they did expect social distancing and apparently they don’t have a population full of people who melt because they are asked to sacrifice a teeny bit of personal freedom. They also have 10 million total people. We have several urban metro areas with many more than that, a big minority population that seems to be prone to more serious consequences. They are betting on herd immunity. We’ll see if that happens there or here.
So if we were invaded by Russia the Governors would coordinate the response? I think the Governors in the northeast are doing pretty well but the Federal govt has the resources and money to coordinate so the Governors can execute. We wasted Feb and early March, just a fact....the Feds wished it away and the CDC blew the first test regimen and we refused outside tests from other countries. If we had been more aggressive and successful in Feb our deaths would be much lower. So yes a better leader may have put us in a better place.Well that is pretty political. I happen to think the outcome wouldn’t be overly different no matter who is in charge. Do I think our response has been good? Not really. But what would your ideal leader have done differently? And please don’t say more testing because that’s far easier said than done. There is also a supply chain issue. We can’t just produce endless tests on demand.
I also happen to think the governors should be leading the charge, with the help of the federal government. It seems the governors aren’t taking any responsibility on the outbreak and the response, when in reality it’s largely their responsibility to do both.
So if we were invaded by Russia the Governors would coordinate the response? I think the Governors in the northeast are doing pretty well but the Federal govt has the resources and money to coordinate so the Governors can execute. We wasted Feb and early March, just a fact....the Feds wished it away and the CDC blew the first test regimen and we refused outside tests from other countries. If we had been more aggressive and successful in Feb our deaths would be much lower. So yes a better leader may have put us in a better place.
The point is, there is no clear cut easy. answer. The president is properly concerned about the economy. One gets the idea, though, that his concern about the economy relative to the politically inconvenient advice of pandemic medical and science experts , is to try and wish the virus away like some annoying fly and shoot the messengers so they aren’t around to annoy him anymore. One suspects that re-election is the gentleman’s motivation. If the medical experts are close to being right, we are damned if we do or don’t no matter what we do.Also note that suggesting we close the economy down for as long as necessary to contain the virus and protect the vulnerable is also an acceptable compromise to some but not everyone. There is no way forward without risks - the people worried about their jobs are no less righteous than the people worried about their lives.
South Korea uses cellphone data to trace where an infected person has been, and then broadcasts it (without names) so others will know if they may have come in contact. They also use an app that tracks a persons phone to insure that he isn’t breaking quarantine. Although the published data doesn't include names there are cases where people have connected dots, and also businesses where people have been lose business despite cleaning and disinfecting done by the state.
How do you think Americans would respond to such "virtuous surveillance"?
”Give me liberty, or give me death?”South Korea uses cellphone data to trace where an infected person has been, and then broadcasts it (without names) so others will know if they may have come in contact. They also use an app that tracks a persons phone to insure that he isn’t breaking quarantine. Although the published data doesn't include names there are cases where people have connected dots, and also businesses where people have been lose business despite cleaning and disinfecting done by the state.
How do you think Americans would respond to such "virtuous surveillance"?
Thought it was a ruling against the state health agency making it a state rule. You have a link that indicates it was otherwise.Supreme Court of Wisconsin just struck down the stay at home order from the Governor, all restaurants and bars can open immediately.
It's pretty obvious this was always going to happen around the country.
But it was always going to happen. It's why our lockdown was never tenable. I always expected the shutdown to be until June 1st. You don't shut things down and pick winners and losers (all big box stores stay open and get money, mom and pops shutdown and get shafted.)
You don't tell people they're shutting down for 2 weeks and then turn 2 weeks into 5 months. Of course people are going to freak out. I think some states are opening up too quickly but it's totally unsurprising. If Pritzker is planning on keeping thing sshutdown in the state into August like he's hinted at, things will start getting ugly.
The point is, there is no clear cut easy. answer. The president is properly concerned about the economy. One gets the idea, though, that his concern about the economy relative to the politically inconvenient advice of pandemic medical and science experts , is to try and wish the virus away like some annoying fly and shoot the messengers so they aren’t around to annoy him anymore. One suspects that re-election is the gentleman’s motivation. If the medical experts are close to being right, we are damned if we do or don’t no matter what we do.
Until we know that this virus can be controlled and/or that herd immunity occurs, we won’t know if a rush to reopen is a good or bad move long term for the economy. I know we have millions of people who think they are immune to the virus to the extent that wearing a mask or distancing is an incredible violation of their rights. That attitude seems to make controlling this sucker harder than maybe it should be. I’m pretty sure the medical experts are under a lot of pressure to help the politicians, but not at the expense of providing the best medical advice they can. All I’m sure of is that contagion experts know contagion way better than any politician or former real estate developer.
Absolutely. On line learning has been around since the late 90's and has slowly increased in popularity but I do question its merits. I am not proud of it but I remember a cousin of my wife was taking an online class and needed a high 90 on the final exam to pass the course with a D-. I reluctantly helped and this person received a D-.Yeah it pretty much sucks and people learn differently and if you've been thrust into this as a teacher it really sucks. It's a totally different teaching conversation. There's an article in the journal (maybe) that talks about how colleges are investing in retraining professors to teach online I think USF is allocating $5M to do it.
Much of higher ed has dismissed it as inferior for too long and the category has to adapt. There are purely online programs for major universities, I think even Yale has one or more, I forget the department(s) - this is going to shift the conversation around online delivery in higher ed and schools that find way to deliver programs in an online and in-person format will win. I personally think it's inferior as so much of college is the outside of classroom experience that helps shape world view and provides people with new perspectives and that is lost in online delivery.
It would be less expensive, but graduates would likely be less prepared for real life.