Bracketology | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Bracketology

Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Messages
554
Reaction Score
2,454
Bracket matrix is looking much better as of todays update. No one has us lower than a 6 anymore and lots of 4s and 5s. On average we are a 5 with only Texas ahead of us for the next 4.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
4,089
Reaction Score
5,890
If Chattanooga gets the auto bid I would want to no part of that team on the #13 line.

I think with De Sousa returning last night it gives the Moc's that additional big to go along with arguably one of the top 3 mid-major back courts in the country.

It will be interesting to see if UTC gets in what damage they can do.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
1,881
Reaction Score
5,952
If Chattanooga gets the auto bid I would want to no part of that team on the #13 line.

I think with De Sousa returning last night it gives the Moc's that additional big to go along with arguably one of the top 3 mid-major back courts in the country.

It will be interesting to see if UTC gets in what damage they can do.

1.jpg
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2016
Messages
2,152
Reaction Score
16,005
The Athletic released an update, have us as a 5 in the midwest. 1st and 2nd rd in San Diego

4 UCLA vs 13 Vermont
5 UConn vs 12 Memphis or 12 Indiana (First Four)
Not a fan of this. Memphis in the first round would be fun, but playing a really talented team that underachieved early and is playing much better lately isn't ideal. Then UCLA in San Diego for Round 2 is miserable.
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
13,383
Reaction Score
48,500
The Athletic released an update, have us as a 5 in the midwest. 1st and 2nd rd in San Diego

4 UCLA vs 13 Vermont
5 UConn vs 12 Memphis or 12 Indiana (First Four)
So basically they once again want us in a scenario similar to facing Ohio St in Cincinnati, Texas in San Antonio, Florida in Miami, UNC in Greensboro.

They did somewhat balance it out with MSG in 2014 and I wouldn't mind another game against the garden gnome.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2015
Messages
1,658
Reaction Score
10,086
I also hate the first four the 12 seed is coming off a W with momentum
Taking into account bid-stealers, the at-large play-ins tend to be 11 seeds by seasons end. I agree, we need to do what we can to avoid those matchups
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,292
Reaction Score
35,180
So basically they once again want us in a scenario similar to facing Ohio St in Cincinnati, Texas in San Antonio, Florida in Miami, UNC in Greensboro.

They did somewhat balance it out with MSG in 2014 and I wouldn't mind another game against the garden gnome.
It's a reminder of the benefits of a top 4 seed, and really why you want a top 3 seed. Certainly doable, though still unlikely.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
3,285
Reaction Score
11,728
It's a reminder of the benefits of a top 4 seed, and really why you want a top 3 seed. Certainly doable, though still unlikely.
While it is fun to project, you guys do realize that these predictions mean zilch and are almost always pretty far off other than predicting the top seeds. Can’t wait for selection Sunday.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,832
Reaction Score
10,528
Getting to a 4 seed would be important to be able to play the first two rounds in either Buffalo or Pittsburgh and have fans be able to drive there. Right now, the only teams probably ahead of us that I can see wanting to play there would be Duke (maybe), 'Nova, Providence and Ohio State. Being ranked ahead of Ohio State at the end of the conference tourneys also becomes critical.

Fun to think about brackets, but at this point that is just science fiction.
 

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
12,268
Reaction Score
19,695
We need at least a three seed if we want to make a run in March. That requires we win out the regular season and two games in the BET.
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Messages
320
Reaction Score
2,464
We need at least a three seed if we want to make a run in March. That requires we win out the regular season and two games in the BET.
We won the championship in 2014 as a 7 seed. So, seeding matters -- but it's not everything. I'm more concerned with how we're playing leading up to the tournament. If we continue to play well, we can beat absolutely anyone - no matter what our seeding might be.
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2016
Messages
2,152
Reaction Score
16,005
Lunardi updated his bracket.


We are a 5 seed in Buffalo facing Slick Rick and Iona in the first round. Ohio State / Toledo for Round 2 and Gonzaga is our 1 seed.

Iona is an exceptionally good mid-major and obviously going against a Hall-of-Famer in Round 1 is not ideal. I saw them play in person @ Quinnipiac recently and they have legit size, as well as big and experienced guards. Would be a fun match-up but not an easy win.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,701
Reaction Score
223,699
Tried to post to Lunardi’s most recent bracket for its but the BY blocked me. I’ll try to post later
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
4,018
Reaction Score
13,639
We need at least a three seed if we want to make a run in March. That requires we win out the regular season and two games in the BET.

We won the entire thing as a 7-seed.
 

Online statistics

Members online
385
Guests online
2,348
Total visitors
2,733

Forum statistics

Threads
160,860
Messages
4,240,984
Members
10,096
Latest member
catsfan11


.
Top Bottom