If Chattanooga gets the auto bid I would want to no part of that team on the #13 line.
I think with De Sousa returning last night it gives the Moc's that additional big to go along with arguably one of the top 3 mid-major back courts in the country.
It will be interesting to see if UTC gets in what damage they can do.
Not a fan of this. Memphis in the first round would be fun, but playing a really talented team that underachieved early and is playing much better lately isn't ideal. Then UCLA in San Diego for Round 2 is miserable.The Athletic released an update, have us as a 5 in the midwest. 1st and 2nd rd in San Diego
4 UCLA vs 13 Vermont
5 UConn vs 12 Memphis or 12 Indiana (First Four)
That would be a majorly unfavorable first two rounds…The Athletic released an update, have us as a 5 in the midwest. 1st and 2nd rd in San Diego
4 UCLA vs 13 Vermont
5 UConn vs 12 Memphis or 12 Indiana (First Four)
So basically they once again want us in a scenario similar to facing Ohio St in Cincinnati, Texas in San Antonio, Florida in Miami, UNC in Greensboro.The Athletic released an update, have us as a 5 in the midwest. 1st and 2nd rd in San Diego
4 UCLA vs 13 Vermont
5 UConn vs 12 Memphis or 12 Indiana (First Four)
I wouldn't really wanna play any of those 4 teams, especially UCLA in SD. I also hate the first four the 12 seed is coming off a W with momentumThe Athletic released an update, have us as a 5 in the midwest. 1st and 2nd rd in San Diego
4 UCLA vs 13 Vermont
5 UConn vs 12 Memphis or 12 Indiana (First Four)
Taking into account bid-stealers, the at-large play-ins tend to be 11 seeds by seasons end. I agree, we need to do what we can to avoid those matchupsI also hate the first four the 12 seed is coming off a W with momentum
It's a reminder of the benefits of a top 4 seed, and really why you want a top 3 seed. Certainly doable, though still unlikely.So basically they once again want us in a scenario similar to facing Ohio St in Cincinnati, Texas in San Antonio, Florida in Miami, UNC in Greensboro.
They did somewhat balance it out with MSG in 2014 and I wouldn't mind another game against the garden gnome.
While it is fun to project, you guys do realize that these predictions mean zilch and are almost always pretty far off other than predicting the top seeds. Can’t wait for selection Sunday.It's a reminder of the benefits of a top 4 seed, and really why you want a top 3 seed. Certainly doable, though still unlikely.
Is UCLA as a 4 allowed to have a de facto home game? 5 seeds and better are supposed to be protected against disadvantage like that.The Athletic released an update, have us as a 5 in the midwest. 1st and 2nd rd in San Diego
4 UCLA vs 13 Vermont
5 UConn vs 12 Memphis or 12 Indiana (First Four)
We won the championship in 2014 as a 7 seed. So, seeding matters -- but it's not everything. I'm more concerned with how we're playing leading up to the tournament. If we continue to play well, we can beat absolutely anyone - no matter what our seeding might be.We need at least a three seed if we want to make a run in March. That requires we win out the regular season and two games in the BET.
Would need to win out and win the Big east Tournament to get a 3 seedWe need at least a three seed if we want to make a run in March. That requires we win out the regular season and two games in the BET.
At 26-7 with no bad losses and 16 Quad 1 and 2 wins we would be a 2 seed.Would need to win out and win the Big east Tournament to get a 3 seed
We need at least a three seed if we want to make a run in March. That requires we win out the regular season and two games in the BET.