AI is saying he has had 34 receptions for 565 yards, a 16.6 avg per catch and two touchdowns. Included are 4 catches for 66 yards and a TD against Stanford, and 4 receptions for 95 yards against Cal. My guess is that he is happy with that.Joly move seems questionable
UConn doesn’t have to share their bowl money with a conference this time around. Will still need to sell tickets, but it won’t be as bad as other times.The irony here is we can only get screwed either way. Any bowl game we make still has the school loosing money. They have to sell the allotment of tickets or pay for them. UConn has never made money from a bowl game.
Love my dogs! Pound the Oranges......
Add to that he’s getting more exposure, more money, playing against better competition and we never really figured out whether he was a tall slot receiver or an undersized TE and never really utilized his talents to the fullest, and I don’t think he’s second guessing himself.AI is saying he has had 34 receptions for 565 yards, a 16.6 avg per catch and two touchdowns. Included are 4 catches for 66 yards and a TD against Stanford, and 4 receptions for 95 yards against Cal. My guess is that he is happy with that.
Joly move seems questionable
I could see a team like KC drafting him as they usually get under the radar guys in the draft and Kelce is getting old.Unless his top motivation was NIL, then he is fine. We could have used him in the close games That we lost and he may have made a difference if we threw the ball to him. My guess is he will go to the combine and then it’s solely up to him.
I am guessing the current UConn staff would not have made that mistake. Just the games UConn lost this year he could have made a difference in at least one of them maybe two.Add to that he’s getting more exposure, more money, playing against better competition and we never really figured out whether he was a tall slot receiver or an undersized TE and never really utilized his talents to the fullest, and I don’t think he’s second guessing himself.
Please update after tonight.With 82 schools going bowling (including the CFP participants) and 134 schools in FBS, we need 52 schools to have at least 7 losses to go bowling.
Currently, 30 have already hit the 7 loss mark.
The following schools have six losses:
Wake Forest
Kansas
Houston
UCF
Arizona
Utah
UCLA
MSU
Northwestern
Maryland
La Tech
New Mexico
Oregon State
Auburn
Kentucky
Old Dominion
The following schools have five losses:
USF
UTSA
North Texas
Virginia
Virginia Tech
BC
NC State
Cal
WVU
Cincy
Michigan
Wisconsin
USC
Nebraska
WMU
EMU
Fresno State
Arkansas
Florida
Oklahoma
Coastal Carolina
App State
South Alabama
UL Monroe
No attack but you may need to catch up on our football situation. As I stated we have never made a dollar on football. Conference or not.UConn doesn’t have to share their bowl money with a conference this time around. Will still need to sell tickets, but it won’t be as bad as other times.
They are entitled to any pool bowl and won’t be at the bottom of the list for any of those, especially at 9-3 or 8-4. We will be in, but the bottom line: keep winning.
All points taken, I just keep seeing NC State fall apart, Plus I miss seeing him in Blue/White.Add to that he’s getting more exposure, more money, playing against better competition and we never really figured out whether he was a tall slot receiver or an undersized TE and never really utilized his talents to the fullest, and I don’t think he’s second guessing himself.
Why? Cal has no control of what bowl it goes to nor what team it faces.Cal just qualified for bowl game. I repeat what I said before on the site, Cal would be a great opponent for UConn in a bowl game. They are both about same quality of team. Hope Dave Benedict at least reaches out to them.
I assure the people who have the least control are Dave Benedict and the cal athletic director and cal is sure as hell going to do nothing for usCal just qualified for bowl game. I repeat what I said before on the site, Cal would be a great opponent for UConn in a bowl game. They are both about same quality of team. Hope Dave Benedict at least reaches out to them.
That is ridiculous. Athletic directors may not be on the team selection committee for the bowl game but there is a lot of networking and politicking that gets teams into bowl games. Just waiting for someone to reach out to us is how we end up playing against teams that most people in Connecticut have never heard of (e.g. Marshall)I assure the people who have the least control are Dave Benedict and the cal athletic director and cal is sure as hell going to do nothing for us
Seems like you’re excluding the 2 5-6 matchups mentioned earlier, no?41 teams are out. We need 11 six-loss teams to lose next week.
Six loss teams:
UL Monroe
Coastal Carolina
Auburn
Oregon State
New Mexico
WMU
EMU
MSU
Wisconsin
Kansas
Cincy
NC State
North Texas
The only two that smell like definite losses are Auburn and Oregon State.By my count, there are now 41 seven-loss teams, and two more guaranteed next week (UVA v VT, EMU v WMU).
That leaves 9 to go. Not that I think it matters as I'm certain we're going bowling regardless.
Next week's schedule with early lines where available for the 11 other teams who could reach 7 losses:
Minn @ Wisc (-2)
NC State (+4) @ UNC
Kansas (+1) @ Baylor
TCU @ Cincy (+1.5)
Rutgers @ Mich St (-1)
Auburn (-11) @ Alabama
N. Texas @ Temple
New Mexico @ Hawai'i
Oregon St @ Boise
Coastal Carolina @ Georgia St.
Louisiana @ UL Monroe
The two games that guarantee a 7 loss team are UVA vs VT and EMU vs WMU. All four are in Shiz's list.Seems like you’re excluding the 2 5-6 matchups mentioned earlier, no?
Monroe, N Texas, Virginia?The only two that smell like definite losses are Auburn and Oregon State.
Probably yes.Monroe?