- Joined
- Sep 21, 2011
- Messages
- 79
- Reaction Score
- 54
I have to think we can't be talking about a large sum of money here. If it were say 10k or 25k, she wouldn't be so quick to cooperate. Just lawyer up and tell the NCAA to pound sand. If they can't find anything, what could they do at the end of the day? they need evidence, and they can't subpoena
that may be what happened in Newton's case
the fact that they turned it over so quickly makes me think they have nothing (or little) to hide
I agree with the sentiment, but I think they've clearly proven that they don't need evidence. After all, they haven't even taken any official action in this case besides re-opening the investigation, and yet Boatright toils on the bench while our offense punches itself in the face repeatedly. The NCAA doesn't need for evidence because they don't need to suspend Boatright for him to have to sit out. Merely informing the school that they are investigating, and that if they find him guilty the school will have to vacate any games he plays since the start of the investigation is enough. Even if you don't believe this is personal against UConn, those are still the stakes.
I think you're right that Tanesha probably doesn't cooperate if it was something egregious, but it's not like she has all that much of a choice to begin with.