I understand you're trying to give an analogy but that replay showed the ND wide receiver holding the FSU defender, preventing him from trying to defend the other receiver. Is the ACC perfect? Hell naw. Was Sandusky protected by the PSU old guard until he was caught? I think so. Does it change the fact that Penn State was jobbed Saturday night? No, it doesn't.
Too much of this happens it doesn't matter about the academic associations and TV monies, etc.. Integrity still matters, even when UNC and FSU continually let people down. I don't defend either of those schools' actions.
Look, you think I'm rooting for this to happen. No, what I'm saying is schools have known to change conferences for reasons other than money. PSU's perception of the Big Ten's treatment of them since they joined could be a catalyst for change. That's all I'm saying.
There was always a segment of the Texas A&M fanbase that wanted to join the SEC but weren't strong enough to force a change. Then, in one year, all that changed. Don't assume that the Big Ten is some kind of fortress that can't be breached. Things change. Organizations that don't manage feedback are looked at as stubborn and resistance to change can corrode even the most historic companies. The ACC didn't heed certain warning signs and we paid the price with losing Maryland.
Just some friendly advice.
PSU's perception of the BIG is overstated on certain boards by almost the same cast of minority characters & it's been this way for years. It's irrelevant much of the time because aliases often back off in person & get exposed for their stupidity.
You have to remember, aTm wanted into the SEC even during the SWC days. It's related to ties with Bear Bryant & leaving UT's controlling shadow. The Big 8 & SEC merger was a shotgun marriage with a ton of issues, many being trust related, from day one. The BIG simply has many, many more decades of stability and principled tradition over the current Big12 and the previous versions (SWC and Big8). Albeit, the Big 8 was a brutal conference during the 70s and 80s, great conference - probably the best during this time frame in terms of a two-headed monster: OU and Neb.
PSU's argument could be they've only been in the BIG since the early 90s, but these PSU to the ACC fans, are a crude, often cruel bunch of nasty aliases whom are also hypocrites hoping for fools gold. The ACC's upside is simply a huge risk in football, too much overlap with the SEC and now even the BIG (PSU & Pitt, IU-Purdue vs ND). There's other reasons why ND has held off on full ACC membership, and these fall in the realm of economics.
Here's the reality of aTm and even Mizzou, they'll come back down to planet earth - it's already starting with aTm, and Mizzou has shown glimpses of its inconsistent self again - Jesus they lost to IU this year. The law averages will prevail.
PS Take a longer journey down expansion history, you'll notice the conferences that change up the most are down south. I think it's inevitable that one of the Va schools will join the BIG (UVa or VT) and it will likely be Duke, not UNC, that represents the state of NC if the BIG goes into this state. But who really knows?