How many "UConn is going to die" posts a day to people need from Rufus to get his point? I need zero. How about everyone else?
So you don't think this structure is to eliminate all independents and force teams to join conferences?
How many "UConn is going to die" posts a day to people need from Rufus to get his point? I need zero. How about everyone else?
I don’t think they care.So you don't think this structure is to eliminate all independents and force teams to join conferences?
Well its certainly designed to discourage independents. And I think that is perhaps smart in the big picture view. They don't want more programs jumping in from FCS that cannot at least get a conf invite. We are a unique animal - arrived at independence a different way.So you don't think this structure is to eliminate all independents and force teams to join conferences?
Why?So we are now alone as the lowest paid participant in the CFP system. Gotta think a conference move is coming?
As the tweet says, Oregon State and Washington State renegotiated their payout to be $3.6mil. True independents will only get $350k. We are the only true independent left. So we are alone at $350k.Why?
So we are now alone as the lowest paid participant in the CFP system. Gotta think a conference move is coming?
![]()
SEC, Big Ten developing plan to share revenue with players in potential landmark change to college athletics
The model being discussed by college sports' top conferences could go a long way toward settling outstanding lawsuitswww.cbssports.com
It would be smart to add schools like UConn and Kansas. Add to the football Ws and yet also finally bring some legit college basketball chops to a struggling field. They got the power football they need already.The SEC and B1G are creating brutal schedules for their teams through realignment.
Consider this...........
USC was voted as having the toughest schedule in the B1G for 2024, yet USC does not play arguably the top two teams in the conference - Ohio State and Oregon.
Can you imagine having the toughest schedule in your conference and not playing the top two teams in the conference? It's going to be interesting to see how this all plays out, but it's also why these conferences will dominate the at-large picks for the CFP.
It would be smart to add schools like UConn and Kansas. Add to the football Ws and yet also finally bring some legit college basketball chops to a struggling field. They got the power football they need already.
The only way Maryland is benefitting the B1G is basketball is by getting beaten by the top tier consistently. At least they can boast that they finished ahead of Rutgers last season.I think basketball is currently undervalued in conference payouts. Once everything is hashed out with football rules, I think basketball is next on the docket. How much money can an expanded March Madness bring in, especially if the NCAA is pushed out of the equation? Maybe not as valuable as football, but definitely much more valuable than today.
And if it does prove valuable enough for the B1G, then UConn, Kansas, Arizona, UNC, Duke, and Syracuse all have to be potential expansion targets. Right now, only UNC makes that list.
So far, only Maryland and UCLA have been additions benefitting basketball for the B1G, and that was more coincidental than intentional.
Oh, I can think of roughly 75,000,000 reasons they benefited from their move.The only way Maryland is benefitting the B1G is basketball is by getting beaten by the top tier consistently. At least they can boast that they finished ahead of Rutgers last season.
Rufus said that Big Ten basketball benefited from acquiring Maryland and UCLA. I don't see how they those acquistions have improved Big Ten basketball. I believe you are stating that Maryland is the beneficiary of the move, and you are certainly correct on that. Same goes to UCLA and RU.Oh, I can think of roughly 75,000,000 reasons they benefited from their move.
Getting the Big Ten network on the first tier of cable with premium pricing in the DMV and LA markets would seem to be a fairly significant benefit to me. Rutgers brought them first tier pricing in the NYCDMA. That alone was a huge win for them. None of those additions were attempts to improve the quality of play on the field or on the court. They were money grabs, pure and simple, and very strategic ones at that.Rufus said that Big Ten basketball benefited from acquiring Maryland and UCLA. I don't see how they those acquistions have improved Big Ten basketball. I believe you are stating that Maryland is the beneficiary of the move, and you are certainly correct on that. Same goes to UCLA and RU.
Maryland has won the B1G Championship in basketball before. At least the regular season. Not sure if they have won the conference tournament or not. It’s a basketball school. Just like UCLA. Every other add has been a football minded school except Rutgers which is neither.The only way Maryland is benefitting the B1G is basketball is by getting beaten by the top tier consistently. At least they can boast that they finished ahead of Rutgers last season.
The cable bundle is dying. How long will these bundles last? You can’t make a conference move thunking you are going to automatically get carriage.Getting the Big Ten network on the first tier of cable with premium pricing in the DMV and LA markets would seem to be a fairly significant benefit to me. Rutgers brought them first tier pricing in the NYCDMA. That alone was a huge win for them. None of those additions were attempts to improve the quality of play on the field or on the court. They were money grabs, pure and simple, and very strategic ones at that.
The Big 10 Network is a unique situation which will always be an asset either as part of cable bundles or as a separately paid for subscription. For the latter, fan size and intensity will be more relevant than geography.The cable bundle is dying. How long will these bundles last? You can’t make a conference move thunking you are going to automatically get carriage.
Sling and YouTube tv don’t have the Yankees in New York. That, without a doubt, means that there is a market for packages they don’t have these fringe college tv stations.
It isn’t going to be size if media market that matters, it will be intensity if fanbase to buy a service that my team is on. The days of my mom paying for Rutgers football on big 10 channel is over.
![]()
Big Ten outpaced SEC with $880 million in revenue for 2023 fiscal year with most schools getting $60.5 million
The Big Ten continues to outpace the SEC in total revenue. The league reported almost $880 million and distributed $60.5 million to schools.www.usatoday.com
B1G schools received $60.5 million in media rights in fiscal year 2023, except for Rutgers and Maryland as they are still repaying loans. Those 2 schools are inching closer to receiving full shares and earned around $2 million less each than the other 12 schools in 2023.
If each game in NCAA is worth $2M, in last two years, UConn has earned BE $24M alone.I think basketball is currently undervalued in conference payouts. Once everything is hashed out with football rules, I think basketball is next on the docket. How much money can an expanded March Madness bring in, especially if the NCAA is pushed out of the equation? Maybe not as valuable as football, but definitely much more valuable than today.
And if it does prove valuable enough for the B1G, then UConn, Kansas, Arizona, UNC, Duke, and Syracuse all have to be potential expansion targets. Right now, only UNC makes that list.
So far, only Maryland and UCLA have been additions benefitting basketball for the B1G, and that was more coincidental than intentional.