- Joined
- Apr 24, 2022
- Messages
- 9,709
- Reaction Score
- 63,135
Of course UCLA is a great team... if we focus only on the athletes on the roster, and mainly on their height, this is undeniable. But if we look at the coach's record, I think we should see some reasons to keep them off the top slot. Has Cori taught her athletes how to be what Geno calls "basketball players"? After last season, I think this is an open question. She went into the portal to get Kneepkens -- not a bad move -- but has she addressed the problems that sank them last year? Has Leger-Walker solved the problem of their guard play? Can they play at UConn's pace now? Last year they couldn't, and Cori admitted as much during the game.
There have been years when athleticism was enough to win an NC. I don't think this is one of those years. But I could be wrong. The tournament seeding will determine a lot. But I suspect that Texas could well defeat UCLA again and if it happens in the final four, UConn will likely play Texas in the NC game. Whatever the AP seeding should be, it strikes me that it ought to include this consideration. I'm not as confident in the prospect of SC beating UCLA, but I don't rule it out. Quad 1 record matters, but it is not the only consideration. I think AP voters also engage in 'eyeball assessments' of likely matchups -- whether they do so well or badly is immaterial. A case can easily be made for an 'eyeball' conclusion that UConn simply deserves their #1 ranking in AP and the overall #1 tournament seeding.l
There have been years when athleticism was enough to win an NC. I don't think this is one of those years. But I could be wrong. The tournament seeding will determine a lot. But I suspect that Texas could well defeat UCLA again and if it happens in the final four, UConn will likely play Texas in the NC game. Whatever the AP seeding should be, it strikes me that it ought to include this consideration. I'm not as confident in the prospect of SC beating UCLA, but I don't rule it out. Quad 1 record matters, but it is not the only consideration. I think AP voters also engage in 'eyeball assessments' of likely matchups -- whether they do so well or badly is immaterial. A case can easily be made for an 'eyeball' conclusion that UConn simply deserves their #1 ranking in AP and the overall #1 tournament seeding.l
Last edited: