- Joined
- Nov 4, 2018
- Messages
- 2,006
- Reaction Score
- 13,377
Iowa should be #3...but they will be eventually.
Is "eventually" limited to this season?
Iowa should be #3...but they will be eventually.
You think Iowa should be #3 in the country?
South Carolina (7-4) [#64 RPI] {warrennolan.com} won't relinquish the #25 spot without a fight. These two teams are worthy to that lofty #25 spot, Iowa St (9-2) [#9 RPI] and Florida St (11-1) [#21 RPI].
Quite the shakeup in AP rankings 4-10:
Meanwhile, Maryland continues to creep up by virtue of not losing (on its weak schedule). Now up to #4.
- Mississippi State drops 4 spots from #4 to #8 after losing to Oregon.
- Oregon jumps 2 spots from #7 to #5.
- Stanford jumps 2 spots from #8 to #6 after beating Baylor.
- Baylor drops 1 spot from #6 to #7.
- NC State and Tennessee switch spots, with NC State moving to #9 and Tennessee falling to #10.
The NCAA RPI has them at #43 today. That’s certainly not a 1 seed.Wouldn't be shocked if Maryland runs the table and ends up at #2 or 3 by tournament time but nets a 3 seed.
I had the same exact thought. I think if Iowa can grab a #3 or #4 seed and Maryland goes undefeated, they'll probably be a #2 seed. Hard to see them as a #1, though, with that schedule.Wouldn't be shocked if Maryland runs the table and ends up at #2 or 3 by tournament time but nets a 3 seed.
I had the same exact thought. I think if Iowa can grab a #3 or #4 seed and Maryland goes undefeated, they'll probably be a #2 seed. Hard to see them as a #1, though, with that schedule.
How many times in the past several years has it been "new season, same story"? Maryland dominates its inferior schedule and looks veeeewy scaaaaaawy — and then gets a #2 or #3 seed due to precisely the weak schedule that gives an exaggerated impression of how good they are.Agreed that a 2 seed seems more likely than 3 if they run the table. I'm guessing theyll slip up along the way and have 1-2 losses by tournament time. Iowa is going to be tough with Gustafson and a team like MSU could trip them up too. Wish they'd schedule tougher so we could get a better gage on MD, and also get a couple more top 10 matchups.
How many times in the past several years has it been "new season, same story"? Maryland dominates its inferior schedule and looks veeeewy scaaaaaawy — and then gets a #2 or #3 seed due to precisely the weak schedule that gives an exaggerated impression of how good they are.
I seem to recall that in Stewie-Moriah-Tuck's senior year, they were by far the team that hung closest to UConn. Something like a 4-point game where Chong hit the dagger 3 down the stretch. But MD failed to score any high-quality wins and lost twice to Ohio State. Everyone was up in arms when they were given a #2 seed, but then they were shocked on their home floor by Washington in the 2nd round.A couple of those years they played UCONN and actually hung with UCONN better than anyone else in the nation (2016 and 2017)...they likely would've won games against top 5-10 teams and earned a #1 seed had they scheduled tougher from the on set. Or even if they scheduled more games against teams in the 26-50 range rather than loading up on cupcakes, they probably would've been a #1 seed during those years.
To be fair they did have South Carolina and Georgia on their non conference schedule. However, both of those teams have badly underperformed expectations which will hurt Maryland’s model driven ratings down the road.Agreed that a 2 seed seems more likely than 3 if they run the table. I'm guessing theyll slip up along the way and have 1-2 losses by tournament time. Iowa is going to be tough with Gustafson and a team like MSU could trip them up too. Wish they'd schedule tougher so we could get a better gage on MD, and also get a couple more top 10 matchups.
You're right, not the same as the AAC. But for a team that should be vying for a #1 seed, it doesn't offer any top-10 wins like the Pac-12 or ACC do.I’m not understanding the perception that the Big Ten is such a cakewalk conference. This one site has Maryland losing 6 games in the conference schedule. It’s not like the AAC where UConn breezes through it.
And then MD gets all upset with the Selection Committee for giving them a worse seed than they believe they deserve.How many times in the past several years has it been "new season, same story"? Maryland dominates its inferior schedule and looks veeeewy scaaaaaawy — and then gets a #2 or #3 seed due to precisely the weak schedule that gives an exaggerated impression of how good they are.
Ha, I think it got a bit overshadowed by the anticipation of tonight's top 16 preview.Did anybody post the latest AP poll yet?
UConn up to #4
MSST up to #5
ND drops two spots
STAN climbs one spot after getting thumped. That’s interesting.
2018-19 Women's College Basketball Rankings for Week 15 | ESPN