Duh really? Gaffney played against a real crappy team and was 2-10 from the field, was 5 and 2 with assists and TOs vs a team that barely guarded anyone. AG would've been killed for that, It's hilarious to read he gave the ball where Carlton needed to score LOL when he gave him the ball the same place AG and Vital have the last few games when he came up ZERO. The fact he scored 10 was good for us after 2 zeroes last 2 games... if he scored 10 from the same passes and spots the last 2 games we may be 13-7. People need to calm down Temple was dreadful. I hope this is the beginning of the Gaffney era because it needs to be. I'm rooting for the kid he's a Husky after all but the haters are tough to take. But if last night made it clear to you we will be better without AG because Gaffney was "so good" then let's give it a couple more games vs Top 25 teams. DUH!
The duh is in reference to playing time. Kathy was pointing out gilberts games for as an excuse for his poor play. And I said gafney has played even less and peopl should play based on performance not who has played more games. Do you disagree?
The ball movment was night and day. Thats not even arguable.
Nowhere did I say Gaffney was amazing/ made no mistakes or shot it well. I said he takes care of the ball better (he does) and he looks to set his teamates up and get rid of the ball much quicker (he does).
Nowhere did I say “Last night made it clear to me we will be better without AG cuz Gaffney was “so good”.
I literally didnt say or hint at a single thing you are claiming. If you are going to come at (and mock) somebody at least try to understand and represent their argument correctly and get rid of that Boneyard strawman special.