Anna Anyone? | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Anna Anyone?

Not sure why you choose to look in the rear view mirror. This year's team likely to be better passing team, helping everyone. All great shooters teamed with great passers tend to get more shots and earn more notice.
I look to the past because those that do not learn from the past are likely to make incorrect future predictions. Example: Crystal was the best passer last year and Megan the best shooter yet you are predicting better shooting and passing from this team? I suppose Anna could always pass to herself and rebound her own misses :eek:.
 
But she wasn't the pg in the year we are discussing. Doty started at pg, even though her knees had betrayed her and she wasn't the same player. Geno even made a comment going into the tournament that he needed to talk to his guards and that sacrifices had to be made if they were to win. I thought it was a puzzling comment but Jefferson took over the bulk of the pg minutes.

I always thought Hartley was over-rated. She was a clutch shooter late in games which earns her a lot of points but she was a mediocre 1st half shooter. She and Dolson were also personally responsible for several losses to N Dame with their insistence on challenging Diggins on in-bounds passes. Diggins owned Hartley and still does in the W. I watched a game this past year and Diggins can still run down Hartley from behind and block her shot on a breakaway. In the 2013 FF game Dolson finally learned and passed away from Diggins (and Hartley) on inbounds passes and UConn won.
In the year we are discussing (2012-13) Hartley was battling her own injuries and it was Bria that went to the coaching staff with a recommendation for Caroline to move into the starting line up as the PG. As far as Hartley being overrated-nah... She was streaky and surrounded by great talent but when you look at the final number 6th all time in Assists and 12 all time in Points scored you got to give it up.
 
None? Really? I m concerned that CW and/or EW are the two most likely to bring the MW agenda [WNBA] onto the court. I hope not. We'll see, eh?
That is just slanderous. Megan brought a WNBA agenda onto the court?
1607023397649.png
 
Last edited:
In the year we are discussing (2012-13) Hartley was battling her own injuries and it was Bria that went to the coaching staff with a recommendation for Caroline to move into the starting line up as the PG. As far as Hartley being overrated-nah... She was streaky and surrounded by great talent but when you look at the final number 6th all time in Assists and 12 all time in Points scored you got to give it up.

Maybe you got to give it up. I loved her shooting in the last 5 minutes of a big game but she lost as many games for UConn as she won. Especially against N Dame, our biggest rival in that era.
 
I believe Anna will pick up where she left off last year and become much much better. She has the talent and now the confidence. Her freshman year had to be tough. She had to acclimate to the US, take a starting role because of a short talented bench, etc. I think she is unselfish and a great team player who will put up very respectable numbers this season.

Me too.........right where she left off. She's already got her "sea legs". She knows the terrain, and knows how to navigate it. The only things she has to adjust to this year is playing with new teammates. That won't take long. She's been doing that since practice began back in October.
 
Last edited:
.-.
Me too.........right where she left off. She's already got her "seas legs". She knows the terrain, and knows how to navigate it. The only things she has to adjust to this year is playing with new teammates. That won't take long. She's been doing that since practice began back in October.
When did our standards sink so low? Right where she left off? Anna last three games of the season last year were against AAC opponents USF, Temple and Cincinnati.
GameMinutesFGM/FGA3PTFGM/AAssistPoints
Temple
37​
4/8​
3/5​
8​
14​
USF
31​
1/4​
1/2​
4​
3​
Cincinnati
36​
3/7​
1/2​
8​
8​
Averages
34.6
42%
55%
6.7
8.3
Is this the type of productivity we are looking forward to and excited about?
 
When did our standards sink so low? Right where she left off? Anna last three games of the season last year were against AAC opponents USF, Temple and Cincinnati.
GameMinutesFGM/FGA3PTFGM/AAssistPoints
Temple
37​
4/8​
3/5​
8​
14​
USF
31​
1/4​
1/2​
4​
3​
Cincinnati
36​
3/7​
1/2​
8​
8​
Averages
34.6
42%
55%
6.7
8.3
Is this the type of productivity we are looking forward to and excited about?
Yeah, but those WERE outstanding defensive teams. :p
 
Who ever said "being an AA defined a player?" Certainly not me! I absolutely understand that there are damn good players that will never be an AA, and that is my ENTIRE point! Not every good player is an AA, and far too often people throw AA around on here that it becomes disrespectful to the players that were actual AAs.
Yeah, like Deion Sanders says about the Pro Football HOF becoming the "Hall of Really Good." To me an "AA" is a first team AA on a 5-player team like the AP - THE best at their position. I know UConn uses the 10-player WBCA AA team for HOH, and I accept that, but I wish they didn't.
 
Yeah, like Deion Sanders says about the Pro Football HOF becoming the "Hall of Really Good." To me an "AA" is a first team AA on a 5-player team like the AP - THE best at their position. I know UConn uses the 10-player WBCA AA team for HOH, and I accept that, but I wish they didn't.
I believe that the reason why Geno used the WBCA is because it was considered the Gold Standard at the time he started the HOH, because it was, and still is the Coaches that vote for the AA team and NOT journalists.
 
When did our standards sink so low? Right where she left off? Anna last three games of the season last year were against AAC opponents USF, Temple and Cincinnati.
GameMinutesFGM/FGA3PTFGM/AAssistPoints
Temple
37​
4/8​
3/5​
8​
14​
USF
31​
1/4​
1/2​
4​
3​
Cincinnati
36​
3/7​
1/2​
8​
8​
Averages
34.6
42%
55%
6.7
8.3
Is this the type of productivity we are looking forward to and excited about?

If you are asking if we would take Anna shooting 55% from 3 and averaging 6.7 assists a game this season, then yes, we would accept that level of productivity. Because if she's shooting 55% from the arc, I'm sure Paige, Nika and company will find her for plenty of shots.
 
If you are asking if we would take Anna shooting 55% from 3 and averaging 6.7 assists a game this season, then yes, we would accept that level of productivity. Because if she's shooting 55% from the arc, I'm sure Paige, Nika and company will find her for plenty of shots.
I'm sure you would. I know it is close to Christmas but I'm not Santa. That is not what I was asking.
You have to factor in the opponents to get closer to what I'm asking. Kind of like Carli Collier currently leading the nation in scoring.
 
.-.
Makurat is a good player, but she is NOWHERE near an All American level player! Her playing time is going to be down significantly this year and she may not even start. Don't get me wrong Makurat is a pretty damn good player, but we often forget just how good some of the previous All American greats at UConn were.
I can tell you that Megan was named an All-American and I think that even last year, that Anna was at least as much a contributor as was Megan .... I recently wrote that I thought that she was not deserving of A/A status but that was after she'd been in the program for three years ... Anna came to the Huskies from a different country and her melding into UConn basketball and the American culture had to be quite difficult and particularly in the latter part of her season, she was a significant asset to this team .... in my mind, at least on the level of Megan and to suggest that she's less than A/A material when Megan was awarded A/A status, doesn't jive with me .... I feel that she's only going to get better and the fact that she's reporting to the team seemingly in better shape, having trimmed down, suggests that we haven't yet seen her ceiling ....
 
Anna will average 25 pts a game. You can take that to the bank. Maybe! Conjecture and speculation are running rampant on the boneyard as we anxiously await our first game. I am chewing my fingernails and watching
Pac 10 games. Maybe I will watch all of Paige's HS games or dream of Azzi and Paige in the same backcourt. I am going crazy. Please don't cancel anymore games.
 
Anna will average 25 pts a game. You can take that to the bank. Maybe! Conjecture and speculation are running rampant on the boneyard as we anxiously await our first game. I am chewing my fingernails and watching
Pac 10 games. Maybe I will watch all of Paige's HS games or dream of Azzi and Paige in the same backcourt. I am going crazy. Please don't cancel anymore games.

I guess that means Aubrey will be average 26 points a game. :rolleyes:
 
I can tell you that Megan was named an All-American and I think that even last year, that Anna was at least as much a contributor as was Megan .... I recently wrote that I thought that she was not deserving of A/A status but that was after she'd been in the program for three years ... Anna came to the Huskies from a different country and her melding into UConn basketball and the American culture had to be quite difficult and particularly in the latter part of her season, she was a significant asset to this team .... in my mind, at least on the level of Megan and to suggest that she's less than A/A material when Megan was awarded A/A status, doesn't jive with me .... I feel that she's only going to get better and the fact that she's reporting to the team seemingly in better shape, having trimmed down, suggests that we haven't yet seen her ceiling ....
That just luda and boder line playa hatin. There are many awards well below the level of AA. For example All-Conference and National Freshman of the year. Had Anna contributed as much as Megan did last year she would have been in contention for some of those lesser awards-but she wasn't. Had Anna contributed as much as Megan last year she surely would have been named one of the top 10 freshman in the country by ESPN-but she wasn't.
 
Anna will average 25 pts a game. You can take that to the bank. Maybe! Conjecture and speculation are running rampant on the boneyard as we anxiously await our first game. I am chewing my fingernails and watching
Pac 10 games. Maybe I will watch all of Paige's HS games or dream of Azzi and Paige in the same backcourt. I am going crazy. Please don't cancel anymore games.
This would be more PPG than any player in Division I last year.

1607030504101.png
 
Makurat is a fine player, but if Westbrook was cleared to play last season, I think Anna would have been a bench player. She started last year and things worked out fine for her but this years team does have more talent, If she can play the point forward from the 4 spot then I see her starting all year, if not she could be pushed back to the 6th man role, I do believe she will help the team out this season, but I’m not seeing her on the same level as Paige, Westbrook, or Williams, the 3 players who will probably be in the spot light this season and the best chances to be all Americans. Liv is more of a specialist at this point, center is one of the deepest positions in the country this year, Cunane, Boston, Collier, and now Prince are 4 of the best post players in all of the land.
I'm hoping that Westbrook is going to be a key contributor this year but she hasn't played competitive basketball for almost two years and recently had some more surgery on her knee or knees .... the presumption that she is going to be a dynamo for this team and Anna is going to be almost an afterthought is based on nothing more than an opinion .... there aren't all that many people here on the Boneyard who have ever seen Westbrook play and have a sense of her abilities .... didn't someone post quite a while back that she had some serious turnover issues when she was with Tennessee .... why are people that apt to minimize Anna and her contributions last year and yet assume that Westbrook was a great talent (without seeing her play) and not be wary of her coming back from a pretty serious knee issue ... why can't we assume that Anna might experience a good sized jump after her freshman year, particularly considering the fact that she not only came into a new program that historically plays at a high level but that she was coming to a new (foreign, to her) country and dealing with all the social issues that she may have been experiencing .... I would suggest that most players, no matter how talented, would have difficulties going into a completely new culture and not have troubles adapting to it all ....
 
.-.
"Too slow" is an opinion given by one BYer. This kid, Anna, is maybe the 'key' that makes a terrific team a great team. Yes, she is a personal favorite of mine. It doesn't mean I don't care for all the other....please! Yes, she is not the fastest, but makes up for it with her intelligence, instincts, and overall skills on the court.
If I understand Geno, just a little bit, he knows what he has in Anna, I bet things will change and kids like Paige, etc, will find her. Yes, she was denied the ball by MW, but also at times by others. Does every player have to be called out? Geno will make sure that Anna sees the ball...important to get her going early! Anna was just a freshman last year and as so may others have pointed out, she came from across the sea into a new environment. Now that she is acclimated at UConn, we should see an improved version....let her bloom into her top tier level.
 
I can tell you that Megan was named an All-American and I think that even last year, that Anna was at least as much a contributor as was Megan .... I recently wrote that I thought that she was not deserving of A/A status but that was after she'd been in the program for three years ... Anna came to the Huskies from a different country and her melding into UConn basketball and the American culture had to be quite difficult and particularly in the latter part of her season, she was a significant asset to this team .... in my mind, at least on the level of Megan and to suggest that she's less than A/A material when Megan was awarded A/A status, doesn't jive with me .... I feel that she's only going to get better and the fact that she's reporting to the team seemingly in better shape, having trimmed down, suggests that we haven't yet seen her ceiling ....

Walker averaged 20pts, 8rbs, and out shot Makurat in EVERY possible metric, and you think Makurat's 8pts and 4 rbs per game made her an equal contributor to Walker? I'm sorry, but that is utterly absurd and borderline delusional! Statistically, Makurat was NOT even half as good as Walker was.
 
"Too slow" is an opinion given by one BYer. This kid, Anna, is maybe the 'key' that makes a terrific team a great team. Yes, she is a personal favorite of mine. It doesn't mean I don't care for all the other....please! Yes, she is not the fastest, but makes up for it with her intelligence, instincts, and overall skills on the court.
If I understand Geno, just a little bit, he knows what he has in Anna, I bet things will change and kids like Paige, etc, will find her. Yes, she was denied the ball by MW, but also at times by others. Does every player have to be called out? Geno will make sure that Anna sees the ball...important to get her going early! Anna was just a freshman last year and as so may others have pointed out, she came from across the sea into a new environment. Now that she is acclimated at UConn, we should see an improved version....let her bloom into her top tier level.

I thought Makurat was fast running the floor. She has a long stride and goes well from foul line to foul line, even with the ball. What she lacked was quickness.
 
Walker averaged 20pts, 8rbs, and out shot Makurat in EVERY possible metric, and you think Makurat's 8pts and 4 rbs per game made her an equal contributor to Walker? I'm sorry, but that is utterly absurd and borderline delusional! Statistically, Makurat was NOT even half as good as Walker was.

Why not compare them as freshmen? I'd say Makurat had a better frosh season.
 
.-.
People aren't throwing that AA term around to be disrespectful or to annoy you. AA expectations has become the reality (norm?) for just about every UCONN WBB player who becomes a starter by sophomore year. There is no other program that can make this claim.

How many sophomore AAs has UConn had, 4 or 5?
 
Why not compare them as freshmen? I'd say Makurat had a better frosh season.

Because that is NOT what the OP stated, they explicitly said that Makurat contributed just as much as Walker did last year.
 
I think though you are being disrespectful to a potentially tremendous shooter (with size_ who may become a primary go-to scorer.

If calling somebody a "damn good player" is seen as "disrespectful" in your eyes, I honestly don't know what to tell you.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,961
Messages
4,546,769
Members
10,428
Latest member
CarloPFF


Top Bottom