Giffey was awesome as a senior. 48% from 3 is simply outstanding. He still only averaged 8.4 points, but that’s understandable on a team with Napier, Boatright, and Daniels. I think people forget that season was a huge improvement for him, though. His scoring averages were 2.2, 2.6, and 4.9 in his first three years. If Karaban averages 4.6 points and 2.5 rebounds per game for us career, I’d be disappointed. Of course, if he shoots 48% from 3 and helps win us a title, I’ll be thrilled.I love Niels but If we get Karaban and he’s 100% of Giffey, I will be disappointed.
Giffey was a great role player. karaban appears to have the chops to potentially be a main cog or even a star.
????? 0k enough of the Giffey stuff, he was a great ROLE player who came up huge in the NCAA TOURNAMENT but Karaban was/is a much better player w a much higher ceilingIf this guy would even give 75% of what Niels Giffey was for us, that would be a massive win. Probably a little more polished coming into college than Niels was though.
Enough of the overrated love, super clutch player BUT a little way overboard for a guy who never averaged double digits.Giffey was awesome as a senior. 48% from 3 is simply outstanding. He still only averaged 8.4 points, but that’s understandable on a team with Napier, Boatright, and Daniels. I think people forget that season was a huge improvement for him, though. His scoring averages were 2.2, 2.6, and 4.9 in his first three years. If Karaban averages 4.6 points and 2.5 rebounds per game for us career, I’d be disappointed. Of course, if he shoots 48% from 3 and helps win us a title, I’ll be thrilled.
Enough of the overrated love, super clutch player BUT a little way overboard for a guy who never averaged double digits.
Little too much of the LOOKED UNBELIEVABLE last time I saw him play syndrome, held off as long as I could about this
Lol couldn't man, sometimes basketball nonsense gets to yaYou should have held off longer.
When you said he'll be a star, I dont get that impression from watching everything available.Which part, Giffey being a role player or Karaban not being brought in ( assuming we get him) to be a role player?
Not too mention automatic from three for much of the season.????? 0k enough of the Giffey stuff, he was a great ROLE player who came up huge in the NCAA TOURNAMENT but Karaban was/is a much better player w a much higher ceiling
I don’t know if he’ll be a star or not, but when you hear about him dominating Pangos games it sounds like he may have a shot.When you said he'll be a star, I dont get that impression from watching everything available.
I held off as long as I could, actually it didn't even phase me at the beginning.Not too mention automatic from three for much of the season.
Not too mention automatic from three for much of the season.
Niels won 2 national championships at UConn and played a combined 61 minutes in those two title games. I agree his stats look unimpressive but he was a really good intangibles player who was in and out of the lineup on a stacked team his freshmen year and his sophomore year he was kind of buried on one of the most talented teams in UConn history despite it being kind of a mess of a year...I don’t know if he’ll be a star or not, but when you hear about him dominating Pangos games it sounds like he may have a shot.
ive never seen him play other than clips so I’m judging based on what I read.
My main point was no way would he be brought in to be Giffey, let alone 75% of Giffey, which is what the initial response was to.
He’s attempted 13 3-pointers and knocked down 11 of them — good for a mind-blowing 84.5- percent clip. And the 6-foot-7 swingman is doing all the little things, too — rebounding, playing strong defense and emerging as a leader on this deep, talented, experienced group of Huskies.I held off as long as I could, actually it didn't even phase me at the beginning.
I never wanted to turn this into a bashing but he averaged 8pts a game! So he obviously was very very very selective when he shot and hit an average at best of 2 3's a game, did he hit some huge ones yes but the ceiling for a new player to have a bigger impact is not insurmountable!
My guess is Karaban will easily be a much better overall college player
Wait a minute, you said enough Giffey... who you now talking about? Heed your own advice.I held off as long as I could, actually it didn't even phase me at the beginning.
I never wanted to turn this into a bashing but he averaged 8pts a game! So he obviously was very very very selective when he shot and hit an average at best of 2 3's a game, did he hit some huge ones yes but the ceiling for a new player to have a bigger impact is not insurmountable!
My guess is Karaban will easily be a much better overall college player
What are you basing this on?
We don't win the NT without Giffey. He was huge. His defense was stellar too.Just a guess, but Niels barely played until junior year and was a bench player then. He came on as a senior and was a completely improved player and major contributor and still not close to our best player. I think the expectation for Karaban would justifiably be much higher.
We all know that’s exactly the reason. You are the only one to call it for what it is, for which I commend you.People on this board are wild, man.
No one is bashing Giffey, but I don't get why it's hard to understand that Karaban, a top 60 recruit, has higher standards built in for his career than Giffey, an absolutely beloved and vital (but) ROLE player.
Dude was critical for our team and I loved his game since his frosh year, always felt he was underrated, but he was never supposed to be a big time player. Karaban has that potential.
The fact that he's a white wing player who shoots 3s is the reason for this comparison and subsequent peeing match?
No one is bashing Giffey, but I don't get why it's hard to understand that Karaban, a top 60 recruit, has higher standards built in for his career than Giffey, an absolutely beloved and vital (but) ROLE player.