UConnSwag11
Storrs, CT The Mecca
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 14,178
- Reaction Score
- 55,750
If Rutgers could get into the Big 10, no reason why UCONN shouldn’t be pushing to get into the SEC!
I don’t really understand conferencing so can someone explain this to me like you were explaining to a 10 year old?
What is the ACC’s benefit in adding three schools who don’t offer anything except punching bags at the bottom of the conference? Especially when the conference is the ATLANTIC COAST conference adding schools from the PACIFIC COAST?
What is SMU’s benefit of not taking any media money until next decade? I understand Cal and Stanford’s conference imploded but what is SMU’s play here?
You're going to have to explain why this is AD Dave's fault at all. They added Calford out of desperation and Notre Dame's influence. SMU opens up Texas to them. We were never going to be added at this point no matter what our AD did and it's foolish to blame him.UConn's athletic director has a lot of explaining to do. This makes no sense on any level. The fact that UConn can't even get an invite to join the ACC makes no sense. They are a fit in many ways. If this truly is a political decision because on a grudge that some school has over UConn, then this should be made transparent once and for all. This isn't fair and in an era of NIL and big money for athletics, this puts UConn at a big disadvantage.
We saw last night firsthand what the big discrepancy in talent level means for the football program. Moves like this will eventually extend to our basketball program and other sports if things aren't changed right now.
Rick Pitino on X: "It's great that the ACC has added Stanford and Cal. I hear the Big East is looking to add teams from Panathinaikos & Olympiacos - it's only a nine hour flight ♂️" / X
It's probably about holding the conference together and getting more votes to prevent dissolution of the GOR.You’re right. I just saw a report that it was NC State that flipped (making me more disappointed we didn’t beat them) and the vote was 12-3. I thought they would buy off the bullies to get unanimity. The interesting thing is that the $50M will be split between an extra payoff for each member and a performance based pool. Since 50 divided by 15 isn’t that much to begin with they have managed to really pull off the perfect exacta - most schools will probably barely get enough to pay their extra costs while the bullies will get an extra pittance that will really piss them off. There is no path where this is sustainable.
Thanks, hopefully they have fun at the bottom of the conferenceSMU joins a power conference and likely makes more money with zero television revenue than they currently do in the AAC. Huge profile jump for them as well.
I just named the remnants.That's not what I said. I said UConn is not going to want to join the remnants of the ACC, as in the schools that are left once all those teams leave. It would be like someone signing on to join Washington State and Oregon State in the current Pac 12
YesI just named the remnants.
You think any of the conferences are adding these schools?
If BC, Cuse, Wake Forest and the like aren't the remnants because they've been taken, then who the heck are the remnants?Yes
BC and Wake I would assume will be, the rest you mentioned have value and I imagine end up somewhere else useful. I imagine SMU gets left behind too, probably Georgia Tech. If it's all those schools you listed then I'd have no problem making that moveIf BC, Cuse, Wake Forest and the like aren't the remnants because they've been taken, then who the heck are the remnants?
Yeah, it has been so hurtful so far, right? Stop it already. Making decisions based on football almost derailed us once before. STOP IT. We are not a football school. We are a basketball school. Embrace that and stop being a pretender.UConn's athletic director has a lot of explaining to do. This makes no sense on any level. The fact that UConn can't even get an invite to join the ACC makes no sense. They are a fit in many ways. If this truly is a political decision because on a grudge that some school has over UConn, then this should be made transparent once and for all. This isn't fair and in an era of NIL and big money for athletics, this puts UConn at a big disadvantage.
We saw last night firsthand what the big discrepancy in talent level means for the football program. Moves like this will eventually extend to our basketball program and other sports if things aren't changed right now.
Yeah, it has been so hurtful so far, right? Stop it already. Making decisions based on football almost derailed us once before. STOP IT. We are not a football school. We are a basketball school. Embrace that and stop being a pretender.
SMU joins a power conference and likely makes more money with zero television revenue than they currently do in the AAC. Huge profile jump for them as well.
Math is hard. You can't have an odd number of conference games with an odd number of football teams.But that's exactly what is likely happening, they're at 14 (*15 w/ Notre Dame) now, and going to 17/18. That lends itself perfectly to moving the conference schedule from 8 to 9 games
The next conference to get cooked is the Big 12. A lot of smaller brands and IMO the clear #4 brand-wise in football among the four.It’s really about safety in numbers. You don’t want to be the Pac 12 or the Big East after realignment, you want to be the Big 12.
If the ACC loses 4-6 schools to the SEC/Big 12 in 10-12 years, you’re still at 12-14 schools and, at a minimum, you’re in a better spot to keep the Big 12 from pulling off UL, SU, Pitt or whoever.
My guess is that they will make a run at West Virginia as the current Big 12 contract gets towards the end.
Things can change quickly my friend. The AD is very fortunate to be basking in a national title in basketball right now. But, if/when Geno retires or has sudden, unexpected health issues and DH decides to leave for greener pastures or if his recruits don't pan out, UConn sports can be in a very different situation.Yeah, it has been so hurtful so far, right? Stop it already. Making decisions based on football almost derailed us once before. STOP IT. We are not a football school. We are a basketball school. Embrace that and stop being a pretender.
I'm not following at all, what do you mean? How would a 9 game schedule not work?Math is hard. You can't have an odd number of conference games with an odd number of football teams.
17*9 = 153. 153 is not divisible by 2. The ACC's options are an 8 or 10 game schedule, and a 10 game schedule is not going to fly with Florida State, Clemson, or Georgia Tech.I'm not following at all, what do you mean? How would a 9 game schedule not work?
I'll let Google or Wikipedia do their thing, but I've heard of one professor from another AAC school who says it stands for "small mediocre university".I don't even remember what SMU stands for
NC State's what I heard. They only needed one.