whaler11
Head Happy Hour Coach
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 44,359
- Reaction Score
- 68,225
LOL
That aged well!
See, the downside of having an AD like Danny White is, well, sometimes when you talk out of your ass, people notice the poop on your teeth.
This is a Palatine National Championship
UCF claims undefeated season was worth $200+ million in exposure for football program
What about in 12 yearsThey just extended the deal for a decade.
The odds of this conference having a television contract in a decade are 50/50 at best.
What about in 12 years![]()
Very much agree. And honestly PAC may be reconstructed in some form as well moving forwardRight now, they have a contract.
I think every conference not named the Big Ten, ACC or PAC12 should not make a lot of concrete plans past 2023-25.
I still think we're going to lose a current conference in there.
What?Look at Alabama. They get racist chicks from New Jersey to go there, these days.
I think @Butch trolls us with the most random thought he could think of.What?
Right now, they have a contract.
I think every conference not named the Big Ten, ACC or PAC12 should not make a lot of concrete plans past 2023-25.
I still think we're going to lose a current conference in there.
I thought you folks might like these comments from The Sporting News:
"That breaks down [to] $6.94 million per year per AAC school, a jump of more than $5 million per year per school. By comparison, according to the San Jose Mercury News, the Pac-12 Networks, the Power 5 conference's own media home, paid out less than $3 million to each member school in 2018. Suffice it to say now, that's un-American. Yes, Pac-12, your idea of competing with the Big Ten and SEC networks now has you sliding behind a Group of Six conference."
ESPN just dropped $1 billion for the AAC media rights | Sporting News
The annual money is disappointing. It's a similar feeling to going through a year-end comp review and your boss rates your year's performance very highly...then tells you that you are only getting a $500/yr raise. It's essentially what the new deal feels like. I thought each school would net $8M-$10M/yr. But no GOR is nice - or maybe not so nice depending on if this conference loses UCF/Houston/Memphis/Cincinnati (or another school with competitive football).
I haven't come across anything about whether or not the exit fees/conditions stay in tact or if they've been revised. If all things remained the same, the new deal guarantees that we will never leave the AAC unless it's to go P5. Just to have that conference certainty will help UConn move forward and rebuild competitive programs. I hope.
If you thought the money was going to be be higher than this, you really, really, really, really, really were not paying enough attention. It's much better than I thought it would be.
The deal has no impact on whether we leave or not because there's 0.00000% chance we're leaving for anything other than a P5 deal. If anyone thinks the Big East is an option, they really, really, really, really, really, really are not paying enough attention.
Feel good post of the year.
And occasionally I am clueless.Umm do they really not know the PAC 12 has other TV revenue.
No wonder people are so clueless - the ‘journalists’ are brain dead.
And occasionally I am clueless.
If you thought the money was going to be be higher than this, you really, really, really, really, really were not paying enough attention. It's much better than I thought it would be.
The deal has no impact on whether we leave or not because there's 0.00000% chance we're leaving for anything other than a P5 deal. If anyone thinks the Big East is an option, they really, really, really, really, really, really are not paying enough attention.
Yet countless other programs continue and many would love to have our seat at the table.The "I told you so" argument is irrelevant. This is not enough money for UConn athletics to survive.