#8 in new AP Poll | Page 4 | The Boneyard

#8 in new AP Poll

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kneepkens is only a junior and will be back next year, was PAC 12 FOY, Shot 39% from 3. Her loss is huge. Pili is just as important, depending on the oppositions defense. All things considered, Kneepkens is a bigger loss. Tall, fast guards who can hit the three are harder to come by than a slow big body with decent footwork.
Yeah, I agree Kneepkens was a big loss for Utah. I’m a little unsure of the context of this comparison of her with Pili?, but she is not even in the conversation with Pili, who is a player that can and has put that team on her shoulders and won games they had no right to win. Kneepkens is a nice player but Pili is a/the star on that team.
 
UConn doesn't have anyone like Caitlin Clark. You will never in your lifetime see a UConn player go for 45+ whereas Clark has done that a few times just this season alone. It's not that we don't have players capable of it, but the system and the coaches will never allow it.
Where does this "Geno will never let scoring +46 happen" stuff come from? Did I miss him actually saying that at some point in recent memory, or is it just projection from long time fans ? I guarantee that if it took Paige (or any other player) getting 46 to win a title Geno would have no problem with it
 
UConn doesn't have anyone like Caitlin Clark. You will never in your lifetime see a UConn player go for 45+ whereas Clark has done that a few times just this season alone. It's not that we don't have players capable of it, but the system and the coaches will never allow it.
Maya Moore hung 40 points on Syracuse after the coach said anyone on the SU team could guard her

 
I wouldn't worry. UConn has a starting 5 of 3 seniors and 2 freshies. The bench is 2 freshies and 2 cheerleaders and 5 out for the season. You get any of the starting 5 in foul trouble and it's over.
Yeah, that’s why TN- Gamecock is worried!:D I don’t think there’s much chance UConn wins that game but it certainly wouldn’t be a good look for South Carolina if they did! I’m pretty sure Dawn will have those kids breathing fire by the time that game tips off. I just want to see them (both) get through the game with no injuries!

Winning isn’t even something I’m thinking about. It’s just too much to expect from a team that effectively has five players that can be absolutely counted on to affect the game in a positive way! Sure, we have Ice and Q who may or may not be able to do something but, let’s face it, if UConn were somehow to win this game, (actually it should be), if SC were somehow to lose this game, at home, with a fully healthy roster, as the undefeated #1 ranked team in the country, it would be one of the greatest upsets of all time!

I can’t really come up with a greater mismatch in all the time I’ve followed women’s basketball! I know Louisville beating Griner’s Baylor team was a big one but at least Louisville had a full roster for that game! Stanford losing to the 16 seed Harvard was another memorable upset but, there again, a fully healthy roster for Harvard! This game makes David and Goliath look like even odds!

The Notre Dame game is where I’m investing my emotions! That game carries some real meaning for us. Can we compete with a bigger team and good guard play? That’s the game we UConn fans should be investing our stock in. It presents us with a challenge that is actually doable and one that, if we win can be expected to boost and consolidate our belief that we can make some noise in the tournament in spite of having the equivalent of a ranked team sitting on our bench! The SC game? To me, it’s basically another Toronto Metropolitan! It’s interesting, but really pretty meaningless unless some sort of miracle happens and even then, it won’t suddenly give us a healthy roster! Notre Dame? - important, South Carolina? - not so much!

I know some will see this as some sort of pre-emptive sour grapes but it’s truly not. I just think the disparity between these two teams is such that the game is essentially meaningless! Now, it may be worth a banner in South Carolina:rolleyes: but in reality, it’s basically an exhibition game! If, Ice and Q are able to somehow develop into contributing members of this team by the end of the season, then perhaps we can talk about being able to match up with top level teams with fully healthy rosters. Until then, it’s just too much to expect.
 
i believe the single game record for uconn is 46, by nykesha, might have been v. stanford.
Absolutely correct. And Svetlana Abrosimova scored 39 against UCLA in 1998, in a game where she sat quite a bit and missed a bunch of free throws.
 
.-.
Yeah, that’s why TN- Gamecock is worried!:D I don’t think there’s much chance UConn wins that game but it certainly wouldn’t be a good look for South Carolina if they did! I’m pretty sure Dawn will have those kids breathing fire by the time that game tips off. I just want to see them (both) get through the game with no injuries!

Winning isn’t even something I’m thinking about. It’s just too much to expect from a team that effectively has five players that can be absolutely counted on to affect the game in a positive way! Sure, we have Ice and Q who may or may not be able to do something but, let’s face it, if UConn were somehow to win this game, (actually it should be), if SC were somehow to lose this game, at home, with a fully healthy roster, as the undefeated #1 ranked team in the country, it would be one of the greatest upsets of all time!

I can’t really come up with a greater mismatch in all the time I’ve followed women’s basketball! I know Louisville beating Griner’s Baylor team was a big one but at least Louisville had a full roster for that game! Stanford losing to the 16 seed Harvard was another memorable upset but, there again, a fully healthy roster for Harvard! This game makes David and Goliath look like even odds!

The Notre Dame game is where I’m investing my emotions! That game carries some real meaning for us. Can we compete with a bigger team and good guard play? That’s the game we UConn fans should be investing our stock in. It presents us with a challenge that is actually doable and one that, if we win can be expected to boost and consolidate our belief that we can make some noise in the tournament in spite of having the equivalent of a ranked team sitting on our bench! The SC game? To me, it’s basically another Toronto Metropolitan! It’s interesting, but really pretty meaningless unless some sort of miracle happens and even then, it won’t suddenly give us a healthy roster! Notre Dame? - important, South Carolina? - not so much!

I know some will see this as some sort of pre-emptive sour grapes but it’s truly not. I just think the disparity between these two teams is such that the game is essentially meaningless! Now, it may be worth a banner in South Carolina:rolleyes: but in reality, it’s basically an exhibition game! If, Ice and Q are able to somehow develop into contributing members of this team by the end of the season, then perhaps we can talk about being able to match up with top level teams with fully healthy rosters. Until then, it’s just too much to expect.
C’mon. The (NET) number 2 beating the NET number 1 would be only a mild upset.
 
C’mon. The (NET) number 2 beating the NET number 1 would be only a mild upset.
Not Regarding tne NET, should it happen it would be a major upset, The Gamecockc are #1 and undeafeated while UCONN is playing witha a depleted roster
 
I wasn’t able to watch any of it, but Oregon State takes down #3 Colorado last night. Clears the way for KState to move up to #2.

It continues to feel like it’s USC in one tier and then 15-20 teams that are on the next tier who all have been hot and looked great, but all have had their warts at various times. A long ways to go before March, but right now it all feels very wide open.
 
I wasn’t able to watch any of it, but Oregon State takes down #3 Colorado last night. Clears the way for KState to move up to #2.

It continues to feel like it’s USC in one tier and then 15-20 teams that are on the next tier who all have been hot and looked great, but all have had their warts at various times. A long ways to go before March, but right now it all feels very wide open.
Oh, please say SC for South Carolina, USC is Southern California
 
South Carolina is good this year. Worthy of a number one ranking this year? Yes.

BUT

We are not some unstoppable juggernaut. We have not blown everybody away. Duke, UNC, Utah, and LSU have pushed us to the final minutes this year. UConn is better than those teams.

LSU didn’t have a “closer”. UConn does. Paige has already proven she can wield the final minutes dagger against a Dawn coached team. If y’all can hang around the whole game, Geno will prevent the mistakes that LSU made in the stretch run on Thursday.

I don’t think Kamilla will be there. And I think her primary backup, Watkins, will be in foul trouble down the stretch. Even if she is in the game at the end, she has been known to make mistakes when under pressure

We both have sim games to play before we meet. Good luck!

No. It will not be a miracle upset if you beat us. It will just be a mild upset.
 
Last edited:
South Carolina is good this year. Worthy of a number one ranking this year? Yes.

BUT

We are not some unstoppable juggernaut. We have not blown everybody away. Duke, UNC, Utah, and LSU have pushed us to the final minutes this year. UConn is better than those teams.

LSU didn’t have a “closer”. UConn does. Paige has already proven she can wield the final minutes dagger against a Dawn coached team. If y’all can hang around the whole game, Geno will prevent the mistakes that LSU made in the stretch run on Thursday.

I don’t think Kamilla will be there. And I think her primary backup, Watkins, will be in foul trouble down the stretch. Even if she is in the game at the end, she has been known to make mistakes when under pressure

We both have sim games to play before we meet. Good luck!

No. It will not be a miracle upset if you beat us.
It still would be with such a depleted team, SC is my bet to win it all this year
Wait another year and my mind will return to Bleed Blue as the favorite
 
.-.
Oh, please say SC for South Carolina, USC is Southern California
Sorry. A court (sort of) awarded the Acronym “SC” to the Trojans in sports even though it is the official designation of our state.. More people in California say “SC” when referring to the Trojans than “USC.”

It’s best to avoid the stupid controversy by using SCar or the Gamecocks. We will also answer to Cocks. Of course “Carolina” brings in the UNC folks.
 
for me Trojans are USC since the Cherryl Miller era, and then I prefer Gamecocks for South Carolina, Just My Opinion
 
I’ll defer to any gamecock fans here, but living in NC all my life USC has been perfectly acceptable. I guess life as a gamecock is unique in the sense that two of the most commonly used names for your school also invoke other schools, USC and Carolina. Obviously anytime I hear Carolina I think of the baby blues so it’s hard for me to use that term - but if it gets in UNC-CH’s craw maybe I should start referring to the Cocks as Carolina always .

And I agree with the sentiment that South Carolina isn’t unbeatable. But I do think they are a cut above the rest right now.
 
if UConn were somehow to win this game, (actually it should be), if SC were somehow to lose this game, at home, with a fully healthy roster, as the undefeated #1 ranked team in the country, it would be one of the greatest upsets of all time!

I can’t really come up with a greater mismatch in all the time I’ve followed women’s basketball! I know Louisville beating Griner’s Baylor team was a big one but at least Louisville had a full roster for that game! Stanford losing to the 16 seed Harvard was another memorable upset but, there again, a fully healthy roster for Harvard! This game makes David and Goliath look like even odds!
Not even close. UConn is a Top 10 team with the 2021 National player of the year, an All American HM, and a bunch of top 15 ranked players. The greatest upset of all time would be Butler beating SCarolina, not UConn
 
Not even close. UConn is a Top 10 team with the 2021 National player of the year, an All American HM, and a bunch of top 15 ranked players. The greatest upset of all time would be Butler beating SCarolina, not UConn
It still would be a great win and an upset
 
That's not egregious. It's comparable to, or better than, the current SOS rank of many other top 25 teams, e.g.:

Texas 47
NC State 43
LSU 65
Notre Dame 63
Baylor 41
Virginia Tech 57
Louisville 48
Michigan State 42
West Virginia 111
Oregon State 62
Where are you getting those SOS rankings from? Warren Nolan shows NC State with a SOS of 13. And NC State is tied with Creighton and Wake Forest for fewest Quad 4 games played to date (1).
 
.-.
Where are you getting those SOS rankings from? Warren Nolan shows NC State with a SOS of 13. And NC State is tied with Creighton and Wake Forest for fewest Quad 4 games played to date (1).
Massey is close with an SOS of 16 to date

 
Where are you getting those SOS rankings from? Warren Nolan shows NC State with a SOS of 13.
I'm using the NET SOS rankings. This is what the selection committee uses.

Warren Nolan's SOS numbers are based on RPI, which I don't consider a good or important measure.
 
Last edited:
And NC State is tied with Creighton and Wake Forest for fewest Quad 4 games played to date (1).
Again, you're basing this information on Nolan's use of the RPI, which is outdated.

Per the NET team sheets, NC State has played two Quad 4 games; UConn has played one; Creighton has played none.

 
Last edited:
Again, you're basing this information on Nolan's use of the RPI, which is outdated.

Per the NET team sheets, NC State has played two Quad 4 games; UConn has played one; Creighton has played none.

I am going to bookmark that NCAA site page. Thank you.
 
I am going to bookmark that NCAA site page. Thank you.
You bet. It's a good one. Be sure to check the drop-down box at the top of the page to be sure the most recent date is selected.
 
Sorry. A court (sort of) awarded the Acronym “SC” to the Trojans in sports even though it is the official designation of our state.. More people in California say “SC” when referring to the Trojans than “USC.”

It’s best to avoid the stupid controversy by using SCar or the Gamecocks. We will also answer to Cocks. Of course “Carolina” brings in the UNC folks.
I don't know what people say in California but the rest of the U.S.says USC as University of Southern California that's what it says when looking up scores or schedule's ..Google USC and see what it says
 
.-.
I don't know what people say in California but the rest of the U.S.says USC as University of Southern California that's what it says when looking up scores or schedule's ..Google USC and see what it says
As the Trojans have largely been absent from the minds of WCBB fans for 40 years, the BY (not TBY or tBY) calls South Carolina SC and the “other one” USC….so as the phrase goes “when in Rome…” so @FanInNC as the newbie should acclimate themselves to the Boneyard Lexicon and any attempt to resist will be akin to Don Quixote tilting a sword at windmills.
 
C’mon. The (NET) number 2 beating the NET number 1 would be only a mild upset.
Yeah, you can say what you will about NET or any other set of letters! South Carolina is a huge, prohibitive favorite in this game! They are fully healthy with the most talented roster in all of women’s basketball! (We might be close if we were healthy, but we’re not) we basically are playing them with five players! Ice & Q are clearly unreliable at this point! They are at home, undefeated, they have an unbelievable size advantage, and their one traditional weakness, their outside shooting, has not only been addressed, but they are now the best three point team in the country! If all that doesn’t add up to prohibitive favorite, I guess there’s nothing left to say! This would be one of the great upsets of all time if we were to somehow win!
 
Massey has South Carolina #1 and UConn #2. Predicts South Carolina with a 73pct chance to win 73-65. South Carolina is suppose to win, so technically it will be an upset if UConn wins, but not a shocking upset.
Right!

If Vandy beats SCar on Sunday, that’s a shocking upset. UConn would not be. Let’s say it would be (at most) a “newsworthy upset.”
 
Yeah, you can say what you will about NET or any other set of letters! South Carolina is a huge, prohibitive favorite in this game! They are fully healthy with the most talented roster in all of women’s basketball! (We might be close if we were healthy, but we’re not) we basically are playing them with five players! Ice & Q are clearly unreliable at this point! They are at home, undefeated, they have an unbelievable size advantage, and their one traditional weakness, their outside shooting, has not only been addressed, but they are now the best three point team in the country! If all that doesn’t add up to prohibitive favorite, I guess there’s nothing left to say! This would be one of the great upsets of all time if we were to somehow win!
A top 10 team beating the #1 team can’t be one of the greatest upsets of all time.

ND is ranked 15 (for now) and is 15.5 point underdogs today against UConn. ND beating UConn would be a bigger upset than UConn beating SC ( @DefenseBB see what I did there?). That’s not to diminish the hypothetical upset if it were to happen - it would be a fantastic win. But UConn isn’t some middling bubble team coming in as a 25 point dog.
 
C’mon. The (NET) number 2 beating the NET number 1 would be only a mild upset.
EXACTLY!!! Maybe UCONN fans are doing the poor mouthing thing like some football coaches I know.....ala Saban, Spurrier and Holtz... Spurrier and Holtz would try to convince fans that Wesleyan University in Conn. could beat us by 6 touchdowns.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,149
Messages
4,554,883
Members
10,438
Latest member
UConnheart


Top Bottom