50/40/90 shooting this year | Page 3 | The Boneyard

50/40/90 shooting this year

After Creighton:

Azzi .493/.482/1.000 4 more swishes from the FT line

Sarah .600/.424/.889. Can she do .600/.400/.900?

Blanca .574/.472/.714 What was up with those missed FTs?

Allie .500/.444/.667.

Ashlyn .414/.393/.778

Team .522/.411/.747. Leading the nation from the arc. Edit: Now #2 from the floor. The top FG % teams: LSU, UConn, SC, Texas, UCLA. All the top teams, basically.
 
Last edited:
I'm wondering how much the 50/40/90 rubric tracks the other identifier we sometimes hear about, the "true 3-level scorer." We'd need more detailed info to break out midrange shots from layups in the first element. Also, 3-level scorers don't always meet the 50/40/90 standard. Blakes and Hidalgo are clearly 3-level scorers, though their percentages fall short. This was true of Clark as well. The key thing is that they each use the threat of scoring at each level to force defensive compromises they can exploit.

We all celebrated Paige's 3-level abilities -- she was a great 3-point shooter, a deadly midrange shooter, and a genius at the rim. The threat of her 3-pt shot drew defenders too close, and she would blow by them into the midrange where the bigs had to decide whether to challenge the deadly dribble-stop jumper, and if they did she'd be at the rim in an instant. This is what made her a "bucket-getter," and every great team needs at least one of these. How many 3-level scorers are there currently 1) on the Huskies, 2) on the top teams?

For #1, I'd say Azzi, Sarah, and perhaps Blanca, and Ash. Kayleigh could become another if her 3-pt shooting continues to improve, because she has the other two elements down. KK is working towards this, but still lacks the midrange element though her perimeter shot is much improved. Allie may be close to mastering all three levels. I had to think hard about Blanca, since although she can score at all 3 levels, she doesn't really rely on that to create her shots. She relies on an irresistible combination of size speed and body control to get to her spots. I could say something similar about Ash -- she has all three, but she doesn't use them to create openings for her drives. Instead, she just looks for an opening and drives straight to the rim. In her prime, I'd have included Carol on this list.

For #2, I'd say on SC there's Tessa and Taniya. Raven appears to be working toward it but isn't quite there yet. Joyce is not a 3-pt threat, yet. Could Agot or Ayla join this club soon? Maybe. On UCLA, Kneepkens and Jaquez are clearly examples. After them, I don't see any obvious cases. On Texas, there's Booker and Rori, and maybe Lee. Are there any others? On Vandy, There's Blakes and that's about it. On LSU, there's Flaujae and Mikayla.

Have I missed anyone?
 
Need to work on that team free throw percentage. ;)
I felt bad for Yanna. Her form isn't bad.
I think the "rule of thumb" for teams is 70% in college and 80% in the pros. I remember the '86 Celtics were +80%. Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Azzi's surprising inability lately to make layups or mid-range jumpers will hurt her 50/40/90 goal. She's so fluid and her mechanics so tight, I wonder what is going on with her...
 
.-.
I'm wondering how much the 50/40/90 rubric tracks the other identifier we sometimes hear about, the "true 3-level scorer." We'd need more detailed info to break out midrange shots from layups in the first element. Also, 3-level scorers don't always meet the 50/40/90 standard. Blakes and Hidalgo are clearly 3-level scorers, though their percentages fall short. This was true of Clark as well. The key thing is that they each use the threat of scoring at each level to force defensive compromises they can exploit.

We all celebrated Paige's 3-level abilities -- she was a great 3-point shooter, a deadly midrange shooter, and a genius at the rim. The threat of her 3-pt shot drew defenders too close, and she would blow by them into the midrange where the bigs had to decide whether to challenge the deadly dribble-stop jumper, and if they did she'd be at the rim in an instant. This is what made her a "bucket-getter," and every great team needs at least one of these. How many 3-level scorers are there currently 1) on the Huskies, 2) on the top teams?

For #1, I'd say Azzi, Sarah, and perhaps Blanca, and Ash. Kayleigh could become another if her 3-pt shooting continues to improve, because she has the other two elements down. KK is working towards this, but still lacks the midrange element though her perimeter shot is much improved. Allie may be close to mastering all three levels. I had to think hard about Blanca, since although she can score at all 3 levels, she doesn't really rely on that to create her shots. She relies on an irresistible combination of size speed and body control to get to her spots. I could say something similar about Ash -- she has all three, but she doesn't use them to create openings for her drives. Instead, she just looks for an opening and drives straight to the rim. In her prime, I'd have included Carol on this list.

For #2, I'd say on SC there's Tessa and Taniya. Raven appears to be working toward it but isn't quite there yet. Joyce is not a 3-pt threat, yet. Could Agot or Ayla join this club soon? Maybe. On UCLA, Kneepkens and Jaquez are clearly examples. After them, I don't see any obvious cases. On Texas, there's Booker and Rori, and maybe Lee. Are there any others? On Vandy, There's Blakes and that's about it. On LSU, there's Flaujae and Mikayla.

Have I missed anyone?
Personally, I think you're basically explaining why it is so rare, if not impossible. (Paige didn't even do it) What if we just let the stat speak for itself rather than dissecting the stat. (I do love you BD)
A missed shot is a missed shot, which could be a change in possession and a lost opportunity.
This stat would be next to impossible for a post player because of their assumed lack of proficiency from 3. I hope a 3-point specialist doesn't achieve this. Should be an efficient star- Paige, Sarah, Azzi (come on Azzi, make shots!), or Pheesa.
Sometimes, for a team to be successful, a star player is asked to shoot a lot. Hannah's not gunna shoot 50/40. Austin Carr averaged 35 a game on a top-25 team. Pistol Pete averaged 46 on an NIT team. It is what it is. A stat of efficiency.
 
After the Villanova game:

Azzi .489/.470/1.000

Sarah .599/.420/.897 She's 1 bucket and 1 FT from .600/.420/.900.

Blanca .573/.474/.750

Allie .506/.439/.667

Team .524/.406/.744
Azzi is 7 FG short of 50.0/47/100
Blanca is 24 made FT short of 56/47/90.0 ;^), leads the team in 3FG percentage (barely) and is 3rd in FG percentage.
 
Last edited:
As of this morning, there are only three players in D-1 currently in the 50/40/90 club:

Gianna Kneepkens (UCLA) 51.8/45.8/95.0
Shay Ciezki (Indiana) 52.9/41.9/91.1
Britt Prince (Nebraska) 57.6/51.9/90.9

(I am using a pragmatic cut-off minimum criteria of scoring at least 10 ppg.)

All three have played in all of their teams games. Ciezki and Prince are their teams leading scorers, while Kneepkens is third on the Bruins.
 
I felt bad for Yanna. Her form isn't bad.
I think the "rule of thumb" for teams is 70% in college and 80% in the pros. I remember the '86 Celtics were +80%. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Yanna had been shooting FTs well before last night. However, she looked uncomfortable and clanked 4 shots last night. Get back into the gym!
 
Our 3-point shooting took a hit tonight, especially from Azzi and Blanca. Post-ND update:

Azzi: .492/.455/1.000

Sarah: .603/.411/.900 Incredible!

Blanca: .556/.419/.750

Kayleigh: .533/.385/.545

Allie: .500/.431/.667

Team: .525/.398/.738

Kneepkens, Ciezki, and Prince are still all over .500/.400/.900.
 
Last edited:
When I originally wrote it, I had 100% in there. The only reason I changed it, was I did not want to jinx her. You know, the sports superstition, and all.
She's still going strong....
 
.-.
Azzi's surprising inability lately to make layups or mid-range jumpers will hurt her 50/40/90 goal. She's so fluid and her mechanics so tight, I wonder what is going on with her...
Watching the tape, she appears sometimes to be a bit off balance on her midrange shots. My guess is the intensity of her full court defensive efforts cost her some shots during the game (I think Ash struggled with this as well because she wasn’t using her legs well when she was shooting g earlier this year). It’s takes more than a few games to figure out what your legs need to do differently as the games goes on. Azzi just needs to stay aggressive and keep shooting at all three levels. She will have a monster game soon.
 
Azzi is slipping a little, and Sarah is moving up. After G'town:

Azzi: .487/.436/1.000

Sarah: .602/.413/.905 Amazing!

Blanca: .561/.409/.778

Allie: .500/.435/.667

Kayleigh: .533/.370/.545

Team: .525/.390/.749
 
After Seton Hall, Sarah slipped a little.

Azzi: .491/.445/1.000

Sarah: .596/.393/.911

Blanca: .574/.404/.750

Allie: .500/.435/.667

Kayleigh: .541/.370/.583

Team: .527/.390/.756. Improved FG% and FT% today.
 
In the Xavier game, Azzi slipped a little, Sarah maintained, and Allie soared. All did well today. Season stats:

Azzi: .487/.441/.971

Sarah: .599/.391/.925

Blanca: .574/.404/.750

Allie: .531/.477/.706

Team: .530/.397/.759

For the first time in several games, our cumulative FT shooting is better than that of our opponents.
 
.-.
Feb. 1 update on other players:

Kneepkens: .527/.471/.958 (56 treys)

Ciezki: .536/.460/.911 (57 treys)

Prince: .562/.500/.930 (32 treys)

Azzi has 67 treys
 

Forum statistics

Threads
166,873
Messages
4,497,235
Members
10,369
Latest member
Crosking


Top Bottom