50/40/90 shooting this year | Page 3 | The Boneyard
.-.

50/40/90 shooting this year

After Creighton:

Azzi .493/.482/1.000 4 more swishes from the FT line

Sarah .600/.424/.889. Can she do .600/.400/.900?

Blanca .574/.472/.714 What was up with those missed FTs?

Allie .500/.444/.667.

Ashlyn .414/.393/.778

Team .522/.411/.747. Leading the nation from the arc. Edit: Now #2 from the floor. The top FG % teams: LSU, UConn, SC, Texas, UCLA. All the top teams, basically.
 
Last edited:
I'm wondering how much the 50/40/90 rubric tracks the other identifier we sometimes hear about, the "true 3-level scorer." We'd need more detailed info to break out midrange shots from layups in the first element. Also, 3-level scorers don't always meet the 50/40/90 standard. Blakes and Hidalgo are clearly 3-level scorers, though their percentages fall short. This was true of Clark as well. The key thing is that they each use the threat of scoring at each level to force defensive compromises they can exploit.

We all celebrated Paige's 3-level abilities -- she was a great 3-point shooter, a deadly midrange shooter, and a genius at the rim. The threat of her 3-pt shot drew defenders too close, and she would blow by them into the midrange where the bigs had to decide whether to challenge the deadly dribble-stop jumper, and if they did she'd be at the rim in an instant. This is what made her a "bucket-getter," and every great team needs at least one of these. How many 3-level scorers are there currently 1) on the Huskies, 2) on the top teams?

For #1, I'd say Azzi, Sarah, and perhaps Blanca, and Ash. Kayleigh could become another if her 3-pt shooting continues to improve, because she has the other two elements down. KK is working towards this, but still lacks the midrange element though her perimeter shot is much improved. Allie may be close to mastering all three levels. I had to think hard about Blanca, since although she can score at all 3 levels, she doesn't really rely on that to create her shots. She relies on an irresistible combination of size speed and body control to get to her spots. I could say something similar about Ash -- she has all three, but she doesn't use them to create openings for her drives. Instead, she just looks for an opening and drives straight to the rim. In her prime, I'd have included Carol on this list.

For #2, I'd say on SC there's Tessa and Taniya. Raven appears to be working toward it but isn't quite there yet. Joyce is not a 3-pt threat, yet. Could Agot or Ayla join this club soon? Maybe. On UCLA, Kneepkens and Jaquez are clearly examples. After them, I don't see any obvious cases. On Texas, there's Booker and Rori, and maybe Lee. Are there any others? On Vandy, There's Blakes and that's about it. On LSU, there's Flaujae and Mikayla.

Have I missed anyone?
 
Need to work on that team free throw percentage. ;)
I felt bad for Yanna. Her form isn't bad.
I think the "rule of thumb" for teams is 70% in college and 80% in the pros. I remember the '86 Celtics were +80%. Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Azzi's surprising inability lately to make layups or mid-range jumpers will hurt her 50/40/90 goal. She's so fluid and her mechanics so tight, I wonder what is going on with her...
 
.-.
I'm wondering how much the 50/40/90 rubric tracks the other identifier we sometimes hear about, the "true 3-level scorer." We'd need more detailed info to break out midrange shots from layups in the first element. Also, 3-level scorers don't always meet the 50/40/90 standard. Blakes and Hidalgo are clearly 3-level scorers, though their percentages fall short. This was true of Clark as well. The key thing is that they each use the threat of scoring at each level to force defensive compromises they can exploit.

We all celebrated Paige's 3-level abilities -- she was a great 3-point shooter, a deadly midrange shooter, and a genius at the rim. The threat of her 3-pt shot drew defenders too close, and she would blow by them into the midrange where the bigs had to decide whether to challenge the deadly dribble-stop jumper, and if they did she'd be at the rim in an instant. This is what made her a "bucket-getter," and every great team needs at least one of these. How many 3-level scorers are there currently 1) on the Huskies, 2) on the top teams?

For #1, I'd say Azzi, Sarah, and perhaps Blanca, and Ash. Kayleigh could become another if her 3-pt shooting continues to improve, because she has the other two elements down. KK is working towards this, but still lacks the midrange element though her perimeter shot is much improved. Allie may be close to mastering all three levels. I had to think hard about Blanca, since although she can score at all 3 levels, she doesn't really rely on that to create her shots. She relies on an irresistible combination of size speed and body control to get to her spots. I could say something similar about Ash -- she has all three, but she doesn't use them to create openings for her drives. Instead, she just looks for an opening and drives straight to the rim. In her prime, I'd have included Carol on this list.

For #2, I'd say on SC there's Tessa and Taniya. Raven appears to be working toward it but isn't quite there yet. Joyce is not a 3-pt threat, yet. Could Agot or Ayla join this club soon? Maybe. On UCLA, Kneepkens and Jaquez are clearly examples. After them, I don't see any obvious cases. On Texas, there's Booker and Rori, and maybe Lee. Are there any others? On Vandy, There's Blakes and that's about it. On LSU, there's Flaujae and Mikayla.

Have I missed anyone?
Personally, I think you're basically explaining why it is so rare, if not impossible. (Paige didn't even do it) What if we just let the stat speak for itself rather than dissecting the stat. (I do love you BD)
A missed shot is a missed shot, which could be a change in possession and a lost opportunity.
This stat would be next to impossible for a post player because of their assumed lack of proficiency from 3. I hope a 3-point specialist doesn't achieve this. Should be an efficient star- Paige, Sarah, Azzi (come on Azzi, make shots!), or Pheesa.
Sometimes, for a team to be successful, a star player is asked to shoot a lot. Hannah's not gunna shoot 50/40. Austin Carr averaged 35 a game on a top-25 team. Pistol Pete averaged 46 on an NIT team. It is what it is. A stat of efficiency.
 
After the Villanova game:

Azzi .489/.470/1.000

Sarah .599/.420/.897 She's 1 bucket and 1 FT from .600/.420/.900.

Blanca .573/.474/.750

Allie .506/.439/.667

Team .524/.406/.744
Azzi is 7 FG short of 50.0/47/100
Blanca is 24 made FT short of 56/47/90.0 ;^), leads the team in 3FG percentage (barely)a and is 3rd in FG percentage.
 

Online statistics

Members online
352
Guests online
8,595
Total visitors
8,947

Forum statistics

Threads
166,457
Messages
4,480,177
Members
10,353
Latest member
PalaP


Top Bottom