50/40/90 shooting this year | Page 2 | The Boneyard
.-.

50/40/90 shooting this year

Even more impressive is our steals are now vastly greater than our turnovers 195 to 154… uncanny
They were +32 last season (455-423), and could finish way above that this season.
 
.-.
Last year was the ONLY time that any Geno team has ever finished with more Steals than Turnovers which is quite an accomplishment.
Yes. This was discussed in a thread last season. It was done a few times in the past when the game was very different from today.
 
At the end of the day, while this is an interesting discussion, I am more focused on a player's ability to score when it matters most-tight games, pressure situations, etc. Good example was the Iowa game when Sarah score 20 the first half while everyone else, Azzi included, were clanking it. Azzi and others finished the game with positive overall stats but without Sarah's work while the game was tight, who knows what could have happened.
 
At the end of the day, while this is an interesting discussion, I am more focused on a player's ability to score when it matters most-tight games, pressure situations, etc. Good example was the Iowa game when Sarah score 20 the first half while everyone else, Azzi included, were clanking it. Azzi and others finished the game with positive overall stats but without Sarah's work while the game was tight, who knows what could have happened.
By the same token, Azzi’s clutch performance down the stretch in the MI game was critical for the Huskies in pulling out the win.
 
By the same token, Azzi’s clutch performance down the stretch in the MI game was critical for the Huskies in pulling out the win.
Did you watch Mi-Oreg last night? Swords and Olsen in clutch time? Oregon slowed MI to a crawl. UConn was not inclined to do that against them. I was at that game. I’m going to rewatch it.
One. Of my head coaching roles, I wanted to institute a “system” like Paul Westhead, with a Dean Smith “blue team” to keep my last 5 involved. Press, run, uptempo. My mentor, an esteemed veteran coach in the DMV, would tell me, “somebody is always going to be better at that than you are”. MI may have been better at it that day than UConn was.
 
At the end of the day, while this is an interesting discussion, I am more focused on a player's ability to score when it matters most-tight games, pressure situations, etc. Good example was the Iowa game when Sarah score 20 the first half while everyone else, Azzi included, were clanking it. Azzi and others finished the game with positive overall stats but without Sarah's work while the game was tight, who knows what could have happened.
HopJim, say what? From the moment Serah scored the first basket at 8:40 of the first period, UConn led the entire Iowa game! The Huskies had a double digit lead at the end of Q1, Q2, Q3, so when exactly was the game "tight" - the first five minutes of the game?? The same first five minutes when Sarah was 1 for 4 and Azzi was 2 for 3?

What pressure situations? Certainly not during the 26 point win over the #11 team. What pressure situations has UConn been in this year? Maybe the second half vs. Michigan? Jeez, I wonder who came through for the Huskies then? Oh, yeah, Azzi Fudd.

Finally, allow me to nitpick your phrasing. I agree with Bob Joyce and Debbie Fiske who maintained throughout the first half against Iowa that there was nothing wrong with Azzi's jump shot: smooth, quick release, shoulders/hips/feet square to the basket, with most of the shots being "in and out" and/or barely missing. Beautiful shooting. Hardly "clanking it"?

Good grief....
 
I am more focused on a player's ability to score when it matters most-tight games, pressure situations, etc.
This is practically a definition of Azzi's game as well as Sarah's. Against UCLA last season, Azzi scored 19 in the first half and didn't score a point in the second half. But she didn't need to. Those 19 points built the lead they never surrendered, and forced UCLA to focus on her the rest of the game. That's the way it goes some games. In her sophomore year against Iowa, she did something similar to them in the 3rd and 4th quarters. Effectively took the game away from them while Nika was busy smothering Clark's offense. Did the same thing to Baylor in the tournament that year. Of course, there are some games when she dominates from start to finish, like the Texas and NC St games early that season. But she seems to have learned that it's better to open things up for teammates. This was always Paige's way, to beat opponents not with her scoring alone, but also with her teammates, who she sometimes seemed to wield like a cudgel. Sarah also has a very good sense of this bit of wisdom.
 
.-.
Azzi had a rough game at Marquette New Year’s Day of this year. Since then she has shot 498/485/936. 2 for 2 gets her to 500, so if she goes something like 5 for 8 tomorrow, she’d have 50/40/90 for a one year period.
 
After 13 games, my local girl is shooting a stellar 51%--and is only second on the team!
Yeah, it's strange that although Azzi was 2-4 on threes, her percentage went down. That's the problem with great shooters; they have to shoot great every night.
 
At the end of the day, while this is an interesting discussion, I am more focused on a player's ability to score when it matters most-tight games, pressure situations, etc. Good example was the Iowa game when Sarah score 20 the first half while everyone else, Azzi included, were clanking it. Azzi and others finished the game with positive overall stats but without Sarah's work while the game was tight, who knows what could have happened.
On the flipside Azzi put the game away. I love teams that put their foot on someone's throat and don't let them get up. Earlier in the season they let other teams get back up.
 
Yes. This was discussed in a thread last season. It was done a few times in the past when the game was very different from today.
Not by UConn. NEVER. I would be curious to see what "era" you are referring to "when the game was very different" as steals vs. turnovers would have to indicate significantly less turnovers, meaning significantly less steals on the other end, sort of mutual offset.
 
Not by UConn. NEVER. I would be curious to see what "era" you are referring to "when the game was very different" as steals vs. turnovers would have to indicate significantly less turnovers, meaning significantly less steals on the other end, sort of mutual offset.
You are correct that Connecticut had never done it until last season. Here's the thread from this past March:

More steals than turnovers
 
.-.

HopJim, say what? From the moment Serah scored the first basket at 8:40 of the first period, UConn led the entire Iowa game! The Huskies had a double digit lead at the end of Q1, Q2, Q3, so when exactly was the game "tight" - the first five minutes of the game?? The same first five minutes when Sarah was 1 for 4 and Azzi was 2 for 3?

What pressure situations? Certainly not during the 26 point win over the #11 team. What pressure situations has UConn been in this year? Maybe the second half vs. Michigan? Jeez, I wonder who came through for the Huskies then? Oh, yeah, Azzi Fudd.

Finally, allow me to nitpick your phrasing. I agree with Bob Joyce and Debbie Fiske who maintained throughout the first half against Iowa that there was nothing wrong with Azzi's jump shot: smooth, quick release, shoulders/hips/feet square to the basket, with most of the shots being "in and out" and/or barely missing. Beautiful shooting. Hardly "clanking it"?

Good grief....
That’s a strong reaction. Sarah was the main scorer to get UConn the comfortable advantage against Iowa. It was far from clutch time but UConn rarely sees that. And, yes I agree Azzi came through when Michigan was making their late run. No one doubts her. She’s great.

(And for what it is worth Syla Swords was shooting miserably from three against Oregon in the second half last night. Not even close. The Wolverines should have put that game away in regulation. I think they were 16 of 36 from the charity stripe. Yikes.)
 
That’s a strong reaction. Sarah was the main scorer to get UConn the comfortable advantage against Iowa. It was far from clutch time but UConn rarely sees that. And, yes I agree Azzi came through when Michigan was making their late run. No one doubts her. She’s great.

(And for what it is worth Syla Swords was shooting miserably from three against Oregon in the second half last night. Not even close. The Wolverines should have put that game away in regulation. I think they were 16 of 36 from the charity stripe. Yikes.)
cwh20, not clear at all with your response to my post, which was a response to HopJim's. His post spoke to a focus on Huskies scoring in tight games or pressure situations vice caring about Azzi's 50/40/90 which was the original subject of this thread. Then he offered Sarah's performance in the the Iowa game in an attempt to illustrate his point.

Not only do I disagree with the premise that the Iowa game was "tight" or presented "pressure situations", I further contend that the only time either of these two perceptions presented themselves was possibly during the Michigan game.

I also disagree with any implication that Sarah's outstanding performance vs Iowa is illustrative of her being able to respond to pressure situations that her teammates somehow cannot.

Whether or not Sarah "was the main scorer to get UConn the comfortable advantage" is not only debatable, but is entirely besides the point as it has nothing to do with tight games, pressure situations or the original post's discussion of Azzi's 50/40/90 quest.

Strong reaction? Absolutely.
 
Now that the regular season is half over, things are evolving. After the Seton Hall game:

Azzi .493/.485/1.000 Where has her midrange gone?

Sarah .584/.426/.875 Only FTs are lacking.

Blanca .565/516/.833

Allie .493/.451/.667

Team .515/.412/.731 Leading the nation from the arc.
 
Some subtle changes after the SJU game:

Azzi .493/.486/1.000 (26-26)

Sarah .595/.438/.875

Blanca .567/.485/.833

Allie .493/.442/.667

Team .519/.411/.739
 
.-.

Online statistics

Members online
412
Guests online
4,225
Total visitors
4,637

Forum statistics

Threads
166,411
Messages
4,478,618
Members
10,354
Latest member
tomasito


Top Bottom