OT: - 21st century CBB Mt. RUSHMORE | Page 3 | The Boneyard

OT: 21st century CBB Mt. RUSHMORE

In 2008 he was. You can't override the facts. That's like saying "Trump is my President" . People who know college basketball way better than you named him the best player in the league. I don't want to hear that you know more than them. I won't even entertain that because it's egotistical nonsense. Too many people living "their own truth".

Here’s your facts

Love
Beasley
Curry

All has win shares over 10 (love was 11.3)

TH was at 8.7

Love was in the top 5 for both O and D win shares.

Beasley in the top 6 for each
 
In 2008 he was. You can't override the facts. That's like saying "Trump is my President" . People who know college basketball way better than you named him the best player in the league. I don't want to hear that you know more than them. I won't even entertain that because it's egotistical nonsense. Too many people living "their own truth".
Tyler Hansboro was a major story for every year he was in college, and they went to an E8, a FF, won a title...while they got upset early his freshman (2006) year to a little school called George Mason.

Whether or not he was the "best player" in any given year, he was undoubtedly good and important every year he played. Same goes for JJ Redick, no matter how much we disliked each. Reddick just didn't win a title.
 
Yea, writers never get anything wrong

I’m going to assume you aren’t a baseball fan.
I'm a huge baseball fan. I don't miss a game. But it was a consensus POY for TH. Look at the non writers in this thread, a good many said TH too. There's too much evidence here to think that he is a fluke. Come on. You can't deny numbers. POY and 3 x consensus 1st team AA, natty. Not to mention that he absolutely abused people at the college level. Go back and watch tape. He was completely dominant. Visibly. In the ACC. If that's not real then nothing is real. I can just as easily say Karl Malone was never good. But they'd just be words.
 
Last edited:
I'm a huge baseball fan. I don't miss a game. But it was a consensus POY for TH. Look at the non writers in this thread, a good many said TH too. There's too much evidence here to think that he is a fluke. Come on. You can't deny numbers. POY and 3 x consensus 1st team AA, natty. Not to mention that he absolutely abused people at the college level. Go back and watch tape. He was completely dominant. Visibly. In the ACC. If that's not real then nothing is real. I can just as easily say Karl Malone was never good. But they'd just be words.

He wasn’t a bad player.

But he wasn’t as good as the other 2 players I mentioned that year

He was also 24 years old at the time.

It shouldn’t matter for single season awards, but I think it provides some context when you do things like this.

He was a grown man playing against 18 and 19 year old kids.
 
Tyler Hansboro was a major story for every year he was in college, and they went to an E8, a FF, won a title...while they got upset early his freshman (2006) year to a little school called George Mason.

Whether or not he was the "best player" in any given year, he was undoubtedly good and important every year he played. Same goes for JJ Redick, no matter how much we disliked each. Reddick just didn't win a title.
Well Said.
 
He wasn’t a bad player.

But he wasn’t as good as the other 2 players I mentioned that year

He was also 24 years old at the time.

It shouldn’t matter for single season awards, but I think it provides some context when you do things like this.

He was a grown man playing against 18 and 19 year old kids.
Beasley had a phenomenal year the year TH won POY. Better numbers at least. But you can't use the age argument if the player you are defending was 19 years old. Obviously 19 year olds aren't at a prohibitive disadvantage. Was TH hands down, without a question heads above everyone that year? No, i wouldnt go that far. But I challenge you to find me an MVP in any sport where, 9/10 times, there is not an argument to be made that someone else had a better year. Either way, strength of evidence tilts heavily towards the player who won POY in reality- not in theory.
 
.-.
Besides being a solid outside shooter, ball handler, and general PITA, Reddick was the absolute master of the "Duke Flop".
I thought his was talking about Tyler Hansborough. I was’t aware I suppose to hate him. Reddick for sure .
I’m not sure whose second on the Duke hate least certainly Battier, and Reddick are contenders for that honor. There is only one number one.
 
All Doug McDermott did during his four years at Creighton was rewrite college basketball’s record books while drawing comparisons to Larry Bird. He left Creighton as college basketball’s No. 5 all-time leading scorer and as the sport’s first three-time All-American since Patrick Ewing.
 
All Doug McDermott did during his four years at Creighton was rewrite college basketball’s record books while drawing comparisons to Larry Bird. He left Creighton as college basketball’s No. 5 all-time leading scorer and as the sport’s first three-time All-American since Patrick Ewing.

I have no problem with people including McD, but would you also include Larry Bird on any Mount Rushmore for CBB other than his '79 rivalry with Magic? Of course, it brought CBB into the mainstream but that's a TV accomplishment but as a NCAA solo effort?.

I had to double check on Kemba for a similar reason. Does his one epic season make him worthy. I say yes because it was that epic. The absolute best of the one year runs. Better than Curry, Nelson, Jimmer and any of the others who carried there teams. IMO, you either need to be a dominant player for multiple seasons or accomplish something so great it demands inclusion. Carmelo is close but I can't get myself to abide putting a one and done player in the top 4, even if they were a No 1. lottery pick who won a championship (AD is out). Battier is close too, but he was the face more than the top player. Horford is close, but Noah was the face and just as good over the two title seasons. (This doesn't have to make complete sense.) Shabazz is also close but I feel it'd be too homerish to include 2 UConn players and Kemba is above Bazz in NCAA history despite 14 being every bit a feat that 11 was and Bazz 2>1. The Kemba legend is still the #1 MBB story since 2000.

I can't think of too many other candidates. Guys who had great numbers but the causal fan can't remember don't belong, either.
 
Too many to name.... There were so many great players over the years...

My List of 5:

Kareem
Walton
Pistol Pete
Steve Alford
Isiah Thomas

Surely the last 2 can be replaced by many names but they do deserve a mention.
 
All Doug McDermott did during his four years at Creighton was rewrite college basketball’s record books while drawing comparisons to Larry Bird. He left Creighton as college basketball’s No. 5 all-time leading scorer and as the sport’s first three-time All-American since Patrick Ewing.
Four years and never made a sweet 16, it's incredibly offensive that anyone compared McDermott to Larry Bird.
 
.-.
This is an individual accolade, not a team one. Kemba is my all time favorite, but he had more surrounding him the Dougie ever did.
Larry Bird singlehandedly took Indiana State to the title game, Curry singlehandedly knocked off the Zags, Georgetown, and Wisconsin before taking Kansas to the brink. McDermott was a great college scorer who rebounded well but couldn't pass and played zero defense. It's insane anyone compared him to Larry Bird.
 
Larry Bird singlehandedly took Indiana State to the title game, Curry singlehandedly knocked off the Zags, Georgetown, and Wisconsin before taking Kansas to the brink. McDermott was a great college scorer who rebounded well but couldn't pass and played zero defense. It's insane anyone compared him to Larry Bird.
Doug had a Defensive Win Share of 5.2 over 4 seasons

Whaley has a Defensive Win Share of 4.8 currently in his 5th season

Doug played defense he just isn’t an all conference defensive player. His lowest DWS was 1.0 and highest 1.7. He was never a defensive liability
 
I have no problem with people including McD, but would you also include Larry Bird on any Mount Rushmore for CBB other than his '79 rivalry with Magic? Of course, it brought CBB into the mainstream but that's a TV accomplishment but as a NCAA solo effort?.

I had to double check on Kemba for a similar reason. Does his one epic season make him worthy. I say yes because it was that epic. The absolute best of the one year runs. Better than Curry, Nelson, Jimmer and any of the others who carried there teams. IMO, you either need to be a dominant player for multiple seasons or accomplish something so great it demands inclusion. Carmelo is close but I can't get myself to abide putting a one and done player in the top 4, even if they were a No 1. lottery pick who won a championship (AD is out). Battier is close too, but he was the face more than the top player. Horford is close, but Noah was the face and just as good over the two title seasons. (This doesn't have to make complete sense.) Shabazz is also close but I feel it'd be too homerish to include 2 UConn players and Kemba is above Bazz in NCAA history despite 14 being every bit a feat that 11 was and Bazz 2>1. The Kemba legend is still the #1 MBB story since 2000.

I can't think of too many other candidates. Guys who had great numbers but the causal fan can't remember don't belong, either.
This was my rationale almost verbatim. Although we may have different people in our 4, ( I included Melo because I can't remember personally watching a an under classman carry a team like that) I also left Bazz off for your reasoning. Even though kembas and bazz's seasons were similar, kembas was just a little more epic. By a slim margin
 
Larry Bird singlehandedly took Indiana State to the title game, Curry singlehandedly knocked off the Zags, Georgetown, and Wisconsin before taking Kansas to the brink. McDermott was a great college scorer who rebounded well but couldn't pass and played zero defense. It's insane anyone compared him to Larry Bird.
It's not insane. It seems like the BY think its very rational. And we are offering actual statistical evidence. I have always enjoyed your commentary on this yard and I still do. But I have rarely seen you give an inch to an opposing view.
 
Too many to name.... There were so many great players over the years...

My List of 5:

Kareem
Walton
Pistol Pete
Steve Alford
Isiah Thomas

Surely the last 2 can be replaced by many names but they do deserve a mention.
We are sticking to 21st century just to narrow it down. But I like this list. I'm a huge Isiah guy
 
Larry Bird singlehandedly took Indiana State to the title game, Curry singlehandedly knocked off the Zags, Georgetown, and Wisconsin before taking Kansas to the brink. McDermott was a great college scorer who rebounded well but couldn't pass and played zero defense. It's insane anyone compared him to Larry Bird.
How do you explain the consensus 3x AA and POY? You continually dismiss this. I can't accept a questioning of the committees sanity or some such weak argument. You can't say "yeah he won Player of the year and was 3x 1st team All American.... BUT...."
 
.-.
Doug had a Defensive Win Share of 5.2 over 4 seasons

Whaley has a Defensive Win Share of 4.8 currently in his 5th season

Doug played defense he just isn’t an all conference defensive player. His lowest DWS was 1.0 and highest 1.7. He was never a defensive liability
And Steph Curry's defensive win shares is 9.3 over 3 seasons. Did you watch McDermott play in college and the pros? I did, he doesn't play defense. Maybe that's changed recently but he certainly didn't used to play any defense. He was the worst defender in the league when he was on the Bulls.

The Draft Starts With Defense: The Curious Case of Doug Mc-No-D | Dean On Draft


There's a Reason Why McDermott Doesn't Play More - Blog a Bull
 
And Steph Curry's defensive win shares is 9.3 over 3 seasons. Did you watch McDermott play in college and the pros? I did, he doesn't play defense. Maybe that's changed recently but he certainly didn't used to play any defense. He was the worst defender in the league when he was on the Bulls.

The Draft Starts With Defense: The Curious Case of Doug Mc-No-D | Dean On Draft


There's a Reason Why McDermott Doesn't Play More - Blog a Bull
you can't use the NBA in this argument. Also you created the idea that you have to be a great defender to be on aRushmore. Tom Brady is immobile and doesn't have a rocket arm. Who cares?
 
Last edited:
Some advanced metrics, like Win Shares, only go so far. Was Derek Jeter the worst defensive SS ever?

Sometimes you have to watch the games...and McDermott didn't play defense.
 
you can't use the NBA in this argument. Also you created the idea that you have to be a great defender to be on aRushmore. Tom Brady is immobile and doesn't have a rocket arm. Who cares?
I can do whatever I want and referred to his cr@ppy defense in college and the pros. I watched him in college, he didn't play defense. You have McDermott on your Mount Rushmore for the last 20+ years of college basketball, that's fine. He's nowhere near mine.
 
Some advanced metrics, like Win Shares, only go so far. Was Derek Jeter the worst defensive SS ever?

Sometimes you have to watch the games...and McDermott didn't play defense.

He wasn’t the worst.
Tony Womack…existed
 
I can do whatever I want and referred to his cr@ppy defense in college and the pros. I watched him in college, he didn't play defense. You have McDermott on your Mount Rushmore for the last 20+ years of college basketball, that's fine. He's nowhere near mine.
College basketball is defined by the NCAAs. If you aren't in the second weekend once over 4 years...
 
.-.
College basketball is defined by the NCAAs. If you aren't in the second weekend once over 4 years...
But this is an individual thing. His team wasn't good enough. This is an age old argument. Look at Matthew Stafford. He finally got a team. He didn't just become a good quarterback this year. It's fashionable to leave someone off the "greats" list if they don't have trophies. We all know Dan Marino was way better than Troy Aikman, for instance, but people still bring up the W's argument. NFL is defined by Post Season wins just as much as ncaa, so the comparison is apt.
 
Damn. Brunson is a good one. Slipped my mind. For some reason he didn't stick out when I was thinking of this. I don't think he jumped off the screen like some of these other guys.
Compared to the last 2 uconn final wins
The '16 and '18nova wins just didn't feel as dynamic. They are kind of just "there". I also don't remember ever thinking that he was the best player in the country at any point even though he was the year he won POY. Even guys like buddy heild and steph jumped off the screen more than Brunson.
The 2018 Nova team is literally one of the best teams of all time. Won every game in the tournament by double digits and is the 2nd best offensive team in the Kenpom era. Brunson being the PG of that team was the driving factor
 
The 2018 Nova team is literally one of the best teams of all time. Won every game in the tournament by double digits and is the 2nd best offensive team in the Kenpom era. Brunson being the PG of that team was the driving factor
I understand that. Statistically it was a great team but it made for a lackluster tourney watching experience. I like a tournament with upsets and drama and the emergence of heroes. Not a tourney when a team cruises the whole way. He also had a great team around him so he didn't have to play hero. But Mt Rushmore is half hero stats/half stats. I can argue that there were way better presidents than George Washington, but can you keep him off?
 
Last edited:
The 2018 Nova team is literally one of the best teams of all time. Won every game in the tournament by double digits and is the 2nd best offensive team in the Kenpom era. Brunson being the PG of that team was the driving factor
This is a Mt. Rushmore. it's not necessarily 4 best statistical players. The presidents on Mt Rushmore weren't all the best presidents. But you can't keep George Washington off.
Kemba, Carmelo, Steph, bazz, etc.
If you really think that Jalen Brunson has the same megastar pedigree in the tourney, then I can't argue. But we know he doesn't @superjohn said in reference to Brunson "He is often overlooked" why? I didn't put him om because he wasn't as big of a star as the rest.
 
Last edited:
The 2018 Nova team is literally one of the best teams of all time. Won every game in the tournament by double digits and is the 2nd best offensive team in the Kenpom era. Brunson being the PG of that team was the driving factor
Let's just enjoy tmrws game and get back to better things. I respect your opinion and it was a fun thread. We disagree but this would be boring if we all agreed
 
This is a Mt. Rushmore. it's not necessarily 4 best statistical players. The presidents on Mt Rushmore weren't all the best presidents. But you can't keep George Washington off.
Kemba, Carmelo, Steph, bazz, etc.
If you really think that Jalen Brunson has the same megastar pedigree in the tourney, then I can't argue. But we know he doesn't @superjohn said in reference to Brunson "He is often overlooked" why? I didn't put him om because he wasn't as big of a star as the rest.
But this isn’t a March madness mt Rushmore. Doesn’t matter if someone had the tourney megastar pedigree.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,326
Messages
4,564,048
Members
10,458
Latest member
Liam Rainst


Top Bottom