Try reading the ESPN writeups for their top 25. (May 6) Focus on the top 3. (The bolding is mine) I admit to being a biased UConn fan.
Women's Way-Too-Early Top 25: Transfers, coaching changes shake up rankings
SCar:
A reasonable analysis.
USC:
Notice that the E8 game isn't mentioned. The term "super team" isn't used but declaring that Watkins and the 2 transfers are the best threesome is very much what they said about Reese, Morrow and Van Lith last season. ESPN makes them No 2. Is this balanced journalism or is it hype to get the west coast fans clicking? I think this USC team has the most to prove of any of the top 4 teams.
UConn:
Two thirds of the UConn blurb is another rehash of the 2024 injuries.
If Bueckers plays to her 2024 level? Bueckers has played at that level for her entire UConn career but ESPN says she still needs to prove herself to be great? Bueckers is 3 for 3 getting her team to a final four. She was NPOY as a freshman. Why can't ESPN give her the same "assumed greatness" they give every other star, many of whom have rather meager resumes compared to Bueckers?
Again, I'm reading with blue-tinted glasses but it seems to me that when analyzing wcbb teams ESPN gives every team but one an upbeat "glass half full" write up while they focus on what has and could go wrong for UConn.
Read the NDame writeup. No doubts as to whether MIles will the same player after her ACL.