- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,943
- Reaction Score
- 10,116
Yup, and Colombia's players might benefit from allowing their captain to do the talkingYou're right, they are definitely arguing because of Carlos Lehder and Escobar.
Yup, and Colombia's players might benefit from allowing their captain to do the talkingYou're right, they are definitely arguing because of Carlos Lehder and Escobar.
I LOVVVE it when someone who has never been to a country comments so strongly about it as if they know it. Just stop. Seriously, before you sound even more ignorant than you already do. This might sound harsh but actually it is a very heavy, but friendly suggestion that you quit asap in regards to comments like this.so we now witness a bunch of guys raised in a culture where drug cartels rule every aspect of life, acting like it.
OH yes refs from Canada, USA and New Zealand are not at all biased, get off it man.... So why no ref from Iran, Korea, Nigeria, France, Ghana, Czech repb etc. Almost anywhere. Could you imagine if the refs were from Spain, Ecuador and Peru for this match? Because that is basically what we have but for England. I am sitting next to some British supporters who even admit how odd the ref selection is but shrug their shoulders too. Come on, be objective.Rarely, is it smart to clearly hold, then obviously trip an opponent directly in front of even "a bit biased ref"
To be fair, I don't give 2 hoots which nation wins and your post stating the refs were "a bit biased" was absolutely unclear. Conveniently, you also opted not to clarify and refrained from providing any supporting evidence. Particularly at that point in the game, what were your examples of purported English bias?OH yes refs from Canada, USA and New Zealand are not at all biased, get off it man.... blah blah blah. Come on, be objective.
England missing chance after chance. It will be really sad to see another match go to PKs.
They've haven't been able to get their headers down all day.
It would be a shame if Columbia won.
Justice. The whiners go home and the winners advance.Why, they did this without their best player?
Why, they did this without their best player?
Justice. The whiners go home and the winners advance.
Why, they did this without their best player?
Always disappointing to see En-guh-land advance.
Because England was clearly the better team all match? I felt the same way with Spain and Russia. Now Croatia and Denmark, that was a true draw.
Fortunately this one worked out.
Always? As if the English advance so often!Always disappointing to see En-guh-land advance.
I really try to love everyone, but I’ve met like 20 brits in my life and only two have been cool