The past set of candidates or the candidates in the tiny bubble for the head coach position in the w really haven't been slam dunks have they? There's a significant amount of uncertainty and risk in hiring a coach in any sport and that's really clear in the WNBA.Maybe I'm glass half empty here, but I just can't come up with many candidates who seem like slam dunk good options who would actually take a position in the WNBA. And most of the teams looking for a new coach are not good destinations currently, making it a tougher sell.
This was the motivation for my original comment that the owners and general managers in the w who have stayed within a very tiny circle of coaches often recycling them might be better served to expand the circle or potential pool of candidates.
I wasn't making an argument that this expanded pool would include any slam dunks but let's face it expanding the pool of coaching candidates couldn't do any worse than what they've done in the past as evidenced by the head coaching turnover in the offseason so far as well as the breathtaking hiring of the million dollar coach without women's coaching experience Nate Tibbetts. That certainly was not a slam dunk.
As to Lindsay Gottlieb. I take her over the million dollar coach every day of the week and twice on Sunday. In the HC chair this past year I think it's highly probable she'd have better record than the million dollar coach. Of course the mediocrity in Phoenix is such that a large number of coaches in all likelihood would have had a better record than Nate including his assistant Kristi Tolliver.
Last edited: