doggydaddy
Grampysorus Rex
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 6,008
- Reaction Score
- 8,970
and on and on.And his snarky reply bothered you enough........ah nevermind.
and on and on.And his snarky reply bothered you enough........ah nevermind.
Which?Thanks Ice I did.
Thanks Ice I did.
Biff, conversations with Tony are always an adventure.
I'm thinking of driving up from Philly if I can get my hands on a ticket that is good enough to justify the trip.
Pollerize, tony, did you mean pulverize or polarize?
tonyc said:Thanks Ice I did
.Hey guys. This is a really really good UConn team.
Pollerize, tony, did you mean pulverize or polarize?
That's cool and you may well be right. But your girls haven't been in a track meet yet. I hope they're ready to run.Stanford wins this game. West Coast Rocks.
You barely beat Baylor at home last year, similar time in the schedule, and you had MM.
Stanford has played two respectable teams in Univ. Texas and the Zags. UConn has played cupcakes.
The Farm will be ready for anything the Huskies throw at them.
However, I wont be rooting for or against you, just for a good game.
Texas - really? The same Texas that beat Southeastern Louisiana at home by 8 whole points?Stanford wins this game. West Coast Rocks.
You barely beat Baylor at home last year, similar time in the schedule, and you had MM.
Stanford has played two respectable teams in Univ. Texas and the Zags. UConn has played cupcakes.
The Farm will be ready for anything the Huskies throw at them.
However, I wont be rooting for or against you, just for a good game.
Coaching counts. Very occasionally , yet over a period of years, I've been calling for the use of a deeper bench AND, specifically, for considering subbing in "waves" at times......running the other team right off the court. Was delighted last night to see that, during a SIGNIFICANT time in the game, Coach did just that. We went on about a 30-2 run.....from what had been something like 11-7, I think. Won't happen every time.....but it'll happen plenty with the depth of talent we have and have had and will have. The folks watching here went happily beserk when he put those three kids in when some of the starters were not performing at the level needed/expected.
This is the one thing I have not understood about Geno, his coaching, and his recruiting. I know that others of you have and will address it, but I just wanted to underscore what Winlots says. I still don't appreciate the short bench philosophy, never will. What makes things interesting in my view is to have a strong plan B, and then also to run the game in waves, as in last night. We were way way undermatched, but still this started to look like UConn basketball the way I like to see it played. I really didn't enjoy last year very much, and could never understand the reason for it. Of course I adore Maya, that has nothing to do with it. It just wasn't nearly as enjoyable and as interesting as what we have now. And next year...oh, Mama mia. I love mixing, matching, and options, so I can watch the Fox as he thinks about things and runs the plays.
That's cool and you may well be right. But your girls haven't been in a track meet yet. I hope they're ready to run.
If you think that the Zags dont make you run then you go to sleep too early.
HC and Pacific, I hope your gals broke a sweat.
That's cool and you may well be right. But your girls haven't been in a track meet yet. I hope they're ready to run.
Ok OC let's see if I've got this straight.Stanford wins this game. West Coast Rocksc.
You barely beat Baylor at home last year, similar time in the schedule, and you had MM.
Stanford has played two respectable teams in Univ. Texas and the Zags. UConn has played cupcakes.
The Farm will be ready for anything the Huskies throw at them.
However, I wont be rooting for or against you, just for a good game.