- Joined
- May 27, 2015
- Messages
- 14,163
- Reaction Score
- 95,351
Yes, nobody is saying otherwise. For example, the 2023-24 UConn team with Stephon CastleRight but we definitely need a blend of top recruits and upperclassmen.
Yes, nobody is saying otherwise. For example, the 2023-24 UConn team with Stephon CastleRight but we definitely need a blend of top recruits and upperclassmen.
"Most people"? I'd be interested in seeing how many people you've identified as being anti-one and done to support this statement.How so? Most people on this board are saying we should stay away from one and done players. Yea it’s good to get players to the league but it’s not like it hurts us if he stays two years (I know it’s not happening).
Well maybe loud people seemed like more. But if the point of getting Castle out in one year is to get on the radar of those types of guys, we’d end up with more one and dones eventually. Hopefully we don’t ever end up like Duke or Kentucky even though I think Hurley would get more out of the players."Most people"? I'd be interested in seeing how many people you've identified as being anti-one and done to support this statement.
More than a few members have criticized Kentucky (and more lately Duke) for only recruiting one and done players, but unless I missed a bunch of posts I don't remember more than one or two of the rabble here arguing against having a few select one and dones to supplement our longer term players.
Right but we definitely need a blend of top recruits and upperclassmen.
My original reply was to the statement that he does more for us as a one and done lottery pick which if it leads to better recruits is true. Without that context the statement is ridiculous.No one disagrees with this. Good grief.
I just see Bart Torviks UConn page and laugh. Look at these 5. Steph Castle analytics are insane. He passes as well as our All American PG, Rebounds as well as our All-American Center, and shoots with basically the same efficiency as our best perimeter shooters. Oh and he leads our team by a mile in Steal % and Free Throw Rate and Box Plus-Minus.
I think we are highly underrating how ridiculous this team is going to look when he gets integrated and playing 70% mpg. Newton gets better cuz he has to handle and create less, Donovan gets easy dunks, shooters get open 3s, Defense he fills our biggest gap of forwards just torching us. Its going to be silly.
And good luck to any team with smallish guards. Newton and Castle will just bully them into the paint all game to crush the defenses.
View attachment 94067
Has he shot enough to make any conclusions? He's 12-22 overall, which were mostly layups and a few short jumpers. He's 1-5 on threes. Tough to take anything away from a sample size that small. But I get your point. The stats to date are the stats.The only thing I disagree with is shooting here. His shooting blows.
Has he shot enough to make any conclusions? He's 12-22 overall, which were mostly layups and a few short jumpers. He's 1-5 on threes. Tough to take anything away from a sample size that small. But I get your point. The stats to date are the stats.
A single statement about a single player does not connotate that someone wants all 1 and done nor does it serve as a plurality amongst the BY and the preference for any type of tenure for players.Right but we definitely need a blend of top recruits and upperclassmen.
You must have missed all the debates during this recruiting seasonA single statement about a single player does not connotate that someone wants all 1 and done nor does it serve as a plurality amongst the BY and the preference for any type of tenure for players.
I've been on this board for a while and can't remember a ton of folks saying to stay away from 1 and done players.
Weren't people saying this about Ball just a couple weeks ago?His shooting blows.
FWIW, no one ever said Ball’s shooting was bad or would stay bad.Weren't people saying this about Ball just a couple weeks ago?
Weren't people saying this about Ball just a couple weeks ago?
Okay.FWIW, no one ever said Ball’s shooting was bad or would stay bad.
Ball's shooting isn't very good either. Noy mechanically, just rushes.
Go reread the UNC postgame thread.FWIW, no one ever said Ball’s shooting was bad or would stay bad.
Forget what us idiot fans think. The coaches all along have said solo is a great shooter whereas with castle they said shooting wasn’t as big of a weakness as they had thought coming in.Weren't people saying this about Ball just a couple weeks ago?
His TS % is like 60%+ given all the free throws he racks up! Say what you want that's a tremendous offensive efficiency. Not everyone is gonna be a knock down shooter at 18 years old. why you so negative.The only thing I disagree with is shooting here. His shooting blows.
Maybe no one saying that isn’t correct. Let me clarify to say I didn’t say that. LolGo reread the UNC postgame thread.
His TS % is like 60%+ given all the free throws he racks up! Say what you want that's a tremendous offensive efficiency. Not everyone is gonna be a knock down shooter at 18 years old. why you so negative.
Actually, you didMaybe no one saying that isn’t correct. Let me clarify to say I didn’t say that. Lol
I understand how that seems, but the general train of thought was that he should just take less 3s. Not stop them altogether.