cferraro04
Sensei
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 2,098
- Reaction Score
- 9,699
I don't think I was being too optimistic by expecting Heather to score one more basket per game and to pull down 1.4 more rebounds per game than last year. Remember Michala was injured and recovering all last year...she played minimal minutes and was mildly productive. I expect that this year will be a much better year for her and again I am only expecting her to score one more basket per game and to pull down one more rebound per game.
Laura Engeln is a good basketball player...she would probably start for a lot of division I schools. At times last year she was lost and didn't understand the offensive and defensive sets of the UConn system...but in spite of that she knocked down some pretty shots, especially that little jumper she has from the left side of the basket. Expecting her to consistently score 3 points more and basically rebound the same with one more rebound every two games isn't asking much.
There is no way that UConn's opponent will average high 60's and low 70's...UConn's defense will be much too good for that. Will some of the elite teams be able to score 70 and 80 points? Sure, some will. However, by and large most teams are going to get blown out and UConn is going to hold most teams to mid 50's and high 40's...this team is going to be quick on quick when it comes to defense...count on it.
With regards to my method of figuring rebounding stats... DD had it about right. I looked at last year's production...taking into consideration that we had Maya out there grabbing 9 rebounds a game... If Maya isn't there that rebound is either going to be grabbed by the opposition or by one of our players. So, it stands to reason that at least half of those rebounds are going to be gotten by our players...especially considering that defensive rebounding is a product of boxing out and being in position to prevent the other team from getting the offensive put-back. So increasing our returning players totals slightly was a no-brainer.
Keep in mind, also, that Stefanie was two different players when you consider her numbers in the first half of the season (while Samarie was at UConn) and the second half of the season (post Samarie). The numbers I assigned her were consistent with the second half of her season going forward to the post season. I am confident that she will perform even better than she did last year...so I may be a little on the conservative side with Stefanie.
I think Bria is a scoring machine but she did not have to fill that role often as long as we had all everything Maya Moore. Even so there were a couple of games where Bria showed what she was capable of...and I expect her to do that more often this year...I think I am on the conservative side with her as well.
Tiffany has a lot to prove this year...it is her last year, pre-WNBA year...she was inconsistent last year...I have been told by those who have seen her this year that she is on a mission to put last year behind her and to have her best year.
Kelly Faris has worked on her shooting all summer, I would be amazed if she didn't look to score more this year...she will always fill up the stat sheet in the other categories.
KML is everything that is said about her...she lived up to her hype in USA basketball...and she was surrounded by elite players...In Europe she was knocking down threes in every game went for 6 in one game...she will be a scoring machine...and if she cracks the starting line-up as she is expected to do...my numbers for her are also conservative. By the way she is a tremendous rebounder.
Kiah Stokes is a big body...I have seen her play...she takes up a lot of space under the basket...she is a blocking machine...she also grabs every rebound that comes near her. She needs work on getting her shot and scoring but two baskets per game is quite doable for her. Then there is
Brianna Banks...a lot is being said about her first step, her defense, her speed...many think she is a Tiffany Hayes type of player but more tenacious on defense...I think she will surprise many people this year. I may have given her a couple of points too many and maybe a couple of rebounds too many...but that being said...given how conservative I was with other players...I think you can indulge me with Brianna...who knows we may both be pleasantly surprised.
Now for the "X" factor...Caroline Doty...I didn't even include her in the stats...she didn't play last year and a lot will depend on her staying healthy. That being said, there is no reason for her not to remain healthy and to not play significant minutes...with the "X" factor UConn becomes rather formidable...just too many options, too much fire power...and great defense at every position.
Laura Engeln is a good basketball player...she would probably start for a lot of division I schools. At times last year she was lost and didn't understand the offensive and defensive sets of the UConn system...but in spite of that she knocked down some pretty shots, especially that little jumper she has from the left side of the basket. Expecting her to consistently score 3 points more and basically rebound the same with one more rebound every two games isn't asking much.
There is no way that UConn's opponent will average high 60's and low 70's...UConn's defense will be much too good for that. Will some of the elite teams be able to score 70 and 80 points? Sure, some will. However, by and large most teams are going to get blown out and UConn is going to hold most teams to mid 50's and high 40's...this team is going to be quick on quick when it comes to defense...count on it.
With regards to my method of figuring rebounding stats... DD had it about right. I looked at last year's production...taking into consideration that we had Maya out there grabbing 9 rebounds a game... If Maya isn't there that rebound is either going to be grabbed by the opposition or by one of our players. So, it stands to reason that at least half of those rebounds are going to be gotten by our players...especially considering that defensive rebounding is a product of boxing out and being in position to prevent the other team from getting the offensive put-back. So increasing our returning players totals slightly was a no-brainer.
Keep in mind, also, that Stefanie was two different players when you consider her numbers in the first half of the season (while Samarie was at UConn) and the second half of the season (post Samarie). The numbers I assigned her were consistent with the second half of her season going forward to the post season. I am confident that she will perform even better than she did last year...so I may be a little on the conservative side with Stefanie.
I think Bria is a scoring machine but she did not have to fill that role often as long as we had all everything Maya Moore. Even so there were a couple of games where Bria showed what she was capable of...and I expect her to do that more often this year...I think I am on the conservative side with her as well.
Tiffany has a lot to prove this year...it is her last year, pre-WNBA year...she was inconsistent last year...I have been told by those who have seen her this year that she is on a mission to put last year behind her and to have her best year.
Kelly Faris has worked on her shooting all summer, I would be amazed if she didn't look to score more this year...she will always fill up the stat sheet in the other categories.
KML is everything that is said about her...she lived up to her hype in USA basketball...and she was surrounded by elite players...In Europe she was knocking down threes in every game went for 6 in one game...she will be a scoring machine...and if she cracks the starting line-up as she is expected to do...my numbers for her are also conservative. By the way she is a tremendous rebounder.
Kiah Stokes is a big body...I have seen her play...she takes up a lot of space under the basket...she is a blocking machine...she also grabs every rebound that comes near her. She needs work on getting her shot and scoring but two baskets per game is quite doable for her. Then there is
Brianna Banks...a lot is being said about her first step, her defense, her speed...many think she is a Tiffany Hayes type of player but more tenacious on defense...I think she will surprise many people this year. I may have given her a couple of points too many and maybe a couple of rebounds too many...but that being said...given how conservative I was with other players...I think you can indulge me with Brianna...who knows we may both be pleasantly surprised.
Now for the "X" factor...Caroline Doty...I didn't even include her in the stats...she didn't play last year and a lot will depend on her staying healthy. That being said, there is no reason for her not to remain healthy and to not play significant minutes...with the "X" factor UConn becomes rather formidable...just too many options, too much fire power...and great defense at every position.