Why cant this program act normal | Page 13 | The Boneyard

Why cant this program act normal

Don't we have three entire boards and over 300 other threads for free range Chating? Do we have to steer 100% of the threads there? Anyways....
 
Chief, this is your all-time best post. I mean, inferring your superior football knowledge is one thing, but to speak of folks insecurity and pretending to to be someone their not - all while you post in the third-person.

Honestly man, hat's off!!!!
As I said, Ironic.
 
One observation. Chief respects the posters who have self awareness and embrace their casual fan status. They tend to be happy and positive and Chief applauds them. We need this type of fan. Where I sometimes see an issue is when a poster is not knowledgeable about a sport but thinks they are. Often this presents itself with a chip on the shoulder insecurity. And as with anything else in life, when you pretend to be someone you are not - it doesn’t go well. Please note, this is an observation, not a criticism.
On the opener last year you said UConn never blitzed and that they looked better than the year before. Just an observation, not a criticism.
 
On the opener last year you said UConn never blitzed and that they looked better than the year before. Just an observation, not a criticism.

Is that your take away from the post below, where I mentioned: “the problem was we didn’t blitz”, “first of many errors Crocker made”, “freshman corner back who got torched”, “ he had 6-7 DB’s in the game - no beef up front”, “no running game in the red zone”, “did we miss Hopkins” etc.
True, at the very end I expressed hope we would show improvement over the previous horrible season due to Pindell’s running ability. But, come on - you weren’t being honest. There’s a reason why you characterized but did not post my post. That reason was to distort.
85C4D96E-B2DF-4E1C-825D-D0FC551E0A87.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Forum statistics

Threads
168,258
Messages
4,560,194
Members
10,448
Latest member
MillerLitEd


Top Bottom