- Joined
- Jun 9, 2017
- Messages
- 6,479
- Reaction Score
- 25,800
When was the last time you put this much effort into a comment?
message board people unironically commenting on message board people is always message board gold.
eh any troll worth their salt hits reply
I miss FfldCntyFan... hopefully he is still around.
I love that you actually had the spare time to do all that antediluvian Boneyard research. Yes, I looked for the silver lining in all the Diaco oddities. And I was wrong. So what. That doesn't change the fact that Edsall is not Diaco. Not even close. There's a history to draw upon. He's not some unknown peripatetic dervish from Notre Dame who defied all the protocols of sanity.Nostical has more hits than the beach boys
An $85M AD should have a better G5 football program no matter where it is, thats all.I love that you actually had the spare time to do all that antediluvian Boneyard research. Yes, I looked for the silver lining in all the Diaco oddities. And I was wrong. So what. That doesn't change the fact that Edsall is not Diaco. Not even close. There's a history to draw upon. He's not some unknown peripatetic dervish from Notre Dame who defied all the protocols of sanity.
More importantly, I'm continuously fascinated by your treatment of Boneyarder musings as critical dissertations. They are not. They're simply opinions. And for you to subject them to some peculiar cross verification procedure, a process you obviously view as somehow significant, should be troubling to your therapist.
Consider the source.Equating Edsall with Diaco is absurd.
Consider the source.
I love that you actually had the spare time to do all that antediluvian Boneyard research. Yes, I looked for the silver lining in all the Diaco oddities. And I was wrong. So what. That doesn't change the fact that Edsall is not Diaco. Not even close. There's a history to draw upon. He's not some unknown peripatetic dervish from Notre Dame who defied all the protocols of sanity.
More importantly, I'm continuously fascinated by your treatment of Boneyarder musings as critical dissertations. They are not. They're simply opinions. And for you to subject them to some peculiar cross verification procedure, a process you obviously view as somehow significant, should be troubling to your therapist.
Everybody that complains RE is behind the times needs to appreciate the participation list for what it really is. It shows the refreshing new thought process of the modern american male.
Just think, he'd even fit in today in california where convicted felons are now called "justice-involved persons" and those on probation are called "persons under supervision". Cut RE some slack and appreciate his new outlook on life.
Quite frankly, one problem with Randy's approach is it complicates the sportscasters job. It will not likely generate favorably coverage during telecasts because we are creating unnecessary obstacles in how they do their jobs. They use the depth chart - it’s industry standard, intuitive and universally understood. I supposed if we were Bama some would think it must be an ingenious cutting edge approach to the game. It won’t be greeted that way with us nor should it. A bad idea.
LOL-I’m sure I speak for many in saying it’s about time someone with your unquestioned level of humility has finally identified the real problem on this board.You arrogantly deliver your opinions claiming they are special
LOL-I’m sure I speak for many in saying it’s about time someone with your unquestioned level of humility has finally identified the real problem on this board.
Congrats Whaler. You've somehow, in your own insufferable way, managed to keep a ridiculous thread going for 8 pages.maybe later ill spend 15 seconds and dig up your condesending dribble on the disaster that was susan herbst. you backed a winner there.
Congrats Whaler. You've somehow, in your own insufferable way, managed to keep a ridiculous thread going for 8 pages.
You'd think if you were batting close to .000 you'd shut up and let the adults talk. But I guess not.
I enjoy the satire that some missed.
Ancient History here but may be relevant, was hurt for '72 season, was offered the job of "spotter" for WTIC radio up in the booth at Memorial, ($10, I believe, lunch, and great view) of course had the 2 Deep Depth Chart in front of me. After whatever play, I would point to the player, who let's say made a good block on that particular play, motion with my forearm out for instance, to indicate, ie., "good block" and the color man, (most of the time), used that. Without that depth chart, yes, you would find a way I suppose, but you are correct, I see unnecessary complications for the broadcaster.Quite frankly, one problem with Randy's approach is it complicates the sportscasters job. It will not likely generate favorably coverage during telecasts because we are creating unnecessary obstacles in how they do their jobs. They use the depth chart - it’s industry standard, intuitive and universally understood. I supposed if we were Bama some would think it must be an ingenious cutting edge approach to the game. It won’t be greeted that way with us nor should it. A bad idea.
Indeed. Thanks for sharing a perspective that perhaps the average casual fan doesn’t get an opportunity to experience. It helps bring to life and illustrates the point Chief is trying to make.Ancient History here but may be relevant, was hurt for '72 season, was offered the job of "spotter" for WTIC radio up in the booth at Memorial, ($10, I believe, lunch, and great view) of course had the 2 Deep Depth Chart in front of me. After whatever play, I would point to the player, who let's say made a good block on that particular play, motion with my forearm out for instance, to indicate, ie., "good block" and the color man, (most of the time), used that. Without that depth chart, yes, you would find a way I suppose, but you are correct, I see unnecessary complications for the broadcaster.
Indeed. Thanks for sharing a perspective that perhaps the average casual fan doesn’t get an opportunity to experience. It helps bring to life and illustrates the point Chief is trying to make.