Why cant this program act normal | Page 8 | The Boneyard
.-.

Why cant this program act normal

whaler11 said:
message board people unironically commenting on message board people is always message board gold.
Expand ...

You ever hear George Carlin's bit on prisons?



BUILD MORE PRISONS!!!!!!!!!


...


but not here
 
whaler11 said:
Nostical has more hits than the beach boys
Expand ...
I love that you actually had the spare time to do all that antediluvian Boneyard research. Yes, I looked for the silver lining in all the Diaco oddities. And I was wrong. So what. That doesn't change the fact that Edsall is not Diaco. Not even close. There's a history to draw upon. He's not some unknown peripatetic dervish from Notre Dame who defied all the protocols of sanity.
More importantly, I'm continuously fascinated by your treatment of Boneyarder musings as critical dissertations. They are not. They're simply opinions. And for you to subject them to some peculiar cross verification procedure, a process you obviously view as somehow significant, should be troubling to your therapist.
 
Nostical said:
I love that you actually had the spare time to do all that antediluvian Boneyard research. Yes, I looked for the silver lining in all the Diaco oddities. And I was wrong. So what. That doesn't change the fact that Edsall is not Diaco. Not even close. There's a history to draw upon. He's not some unknown peripatetic dervish from Notre Dame who defied all the protocols of sanity.
More importantly, I'm continuously fascinated by your treatment of Boneyarder musings as critical dissertations. They are not. They're simply opinions. And for you to subject them to some peculiar cross verification procedure, a process you obviously view as somehow significant, should be troubling to your therapist.
Expand ...
An $85M AD should have a better G5 football program no matter where it is, thats all.
 
.-.
Nostical said:
I love that you actually had the spare time to do all that antediluvian Boneyard research. Yes, I looked for the silver lining in all the Diaco oddities. And I was wrong. So what. That doesn't change the fact that Edsall is not Diaco. Not even close. There's a history to draw upon. He's not some unknown peripatetic dervish from Notre Dame who defied all the protocols of sanity.
More importantly, I'm continuously fascinated by your treatment of Boneyarder musings as critical dissertations. They are not. They're simply opinions. And for you to subject them to some peculiar cross verification procedure, a process you obviously view as somehow significant, should be troubling to your therapist.
Expand ...

lol buddy the search function takes about 8 seconds. the internet is on computers now. your nonsense reply full of big words took way longer.

you arrogantly deliver your opinions claiming they are special because they are informed by your inside information. i enjoy unmasking frauds like you (in this way you are much like diaco).

nice finish with i flap my gums and am wrong 99.9% of the time... but that isn’t the problem. the problem is that people notice. lol
 
Last edited:
Scrutiner said:
Everybody that complains RE is behind the times needs to appreciate the participation list for what it really is. It shows the refreshing new thought process of the modern american male.

Just think, he'd even fit in today in california where convicted felons are now called "justice-involved persons" and those on probation are called "persons under supervision". Cut RE some slack and appreciate his new outlook on life.
Expand ...

I enjoy the satire that some missed.
 
Quite frankly, one problem with Randy's approach is it complicates the sportscasters job. It will not likely generate favorably coverage during telecasts because we are creating unnecessary obstacles in how they do their jobs. They use the depth chart - it’s industry standard, intuitive and universally understood. I supposed if we were Bama some would think it must be an ingenious cutting edge approach to the game. It won’t be greeted that way with us nor should it. A bad idea.
 
Chief00 said:
Quite frankly, one problem with Randy's approach is it complicates the sportscasters job. It will not likely generate favorably coverage during telecasts because we are creating unnecessary obstacles in how they do their jobs. They use the depth chart - it’s industry standard, intuitive and universally understood. I supposed if we were Bama some would think it must be an ingenious cutting edge approach to the game. It won’t be greeted that way with us nor should it. A bad idea.
Expand ...

As usual with you, this is false. So completely utterly wrong.
 
.-.
whaler11 said:
You arrogantly deliver your opinions claiming they are special
Expand ...
LOL-I’m sure I speak for many in saying it’s about time someone with your unquestioned level of humility has finally identified the real problem on this board.
 
Nostical said:
LOL-I’m sure I speak for many in saying it’s about time someone with your unquestioned level of humility has finally identified the real problem on this board.
Expand ...

maybe later ill spend 15 seconds and dig up your condesending dribble on the disaster that was susan herbst. you backed a winner there.
 
.-.
Chief00 said:
Quite frankly, one problem with Randy's approach is it complicates the sportscasters job. It will not likely generate favorably coverage during telecasts because we are creating unnecessary obstacles in how they do their jobs. They use the depth chart - it’s industry standard, intuitive and universally understood. I supposed if we were Bama some would think it must be an ingenious cutting edge approach to the game. It won’t be greeted that way with us nor should it. A bad idea.
Expand ...
Ancient History here but may be relevant, was hurt for '72 season, was offered the job of "spotter" for WTIC radio up in the booth at Memorial, ($10, I believe, lunch, and great view) of course had the 2 Deep Depth Chart in front of me. After whatever play, I would point to the player, who let's say made a good block on that particular play, motion with my forearm out for instance, to indicate, ie., "good block" and the color man, (most of the time), used that. Without that depth chart, yes, you would find a way I suppose, but you are correct, I see unnecessary complications for the broadcaster.
 
oldanintheway said:
Ancient History here but may be relevant, was hurt for '72 season, was offered the job of "spotter" for WTIC radio up in the booth at Memorial, ($10, I believe, lunch, and great view) of course had the 2 Deep Depth Chart in front of me. After whatever play, I would point to the player, who let's say made a good block on that particular play, motion with my forearm out for instance, to indicate, ie., "good block" and the color man, (most of the time), used that. Without that depth chart, yes, you would find a way I suppose, but you are correct, I see unnecessary complications for the broadcaster.
Expand ...
Indeed. Thanks for sharing a perspective that perhaps the average casual fan doesn’t get an opportunity to experience. It helps bring to life and illustrates the point Chief is trying to make.
 
If we are going to play a lot of players there is no reason not to release the 2 deep. This is stupidity and completely unnecessary. I hope we aren't looking for who ate the strawberries shortly.
 
Chief00 said:
Indeed. Thanks for sharing a perspective that perhaps the average casual fan doesn’t get an opportunity to experience. It helps bring to life and illustrates the point Chief is trying to make.
Expand ...

LOL there are are a small group of people on here laughing so hard at you it’s unbelievable. Tell us what else they did during 1972 local radio broadcasts you clown.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Online statistics

Members online
264
Guests online
8,989
Total visitors
9,253
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,259
Messages
4,428,451
Members
10,270
Latest member
McMahonOMan


p
p
Top Bottom