Where is my daily Knicks update? | Page 5 | The Boneyard

Where is my daily Knicks update?

Status
Not open for further replies.

caw

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,137
Reaction Score
13,040
I appreciate you looking up the stats of both players. Felton averaged closer to 2 TO's per game to Lin's closer to 3. That's always been his problem and Felton taking care of the ball was a big reason why NY lead the league in fewest TO's per game. A huge jump with being last or second to last in that category a year ago.

Also I don't like TS%. I think it's flawed and doesn't tell the true story, no pun intended.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


The difference was 2.3 versus 2.9. I get you are trying to make a point, but rounding down and up respectively is really absurd here. It would make more sense to say the difference was .5 TO's per game. Or about 41 TO's over the course of an 82 game season.

As for TS%, I somewhat agree. Felton was a lot by his better from 3, Lin was much better inside the arc.

Lin and Felton were very close statistically this year.

Back to Melo, he is a very good iso-player but he doesn't make anyone better. Great shooter, decent rebounder, lax-defender, horrible at keeping his teammates involved. He really should never be the focal point for a NBA championship aspiring team.
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,527
Reaction Score
19,517
As long as the "team" is built around Melo by James Dolan or anyone he appoints, this will be their story every year.

There. That's better.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
1,330
Reaction Score
2,906
The difference was 2.3 versus 2.9. I get you are trying to make a point, but rounding down and up respectively is really absurd here. It would make more sense to say the difference was .5 TO's per game. Or about 41 TO's over the course of an 82 game season.

As for TS%, I somewhat agree. Felton was a lot by his better from 3, Lin was much better inside the arc.

Lin and Felton were very close statistically this year.

Back to Melo, he is a very good iso-player but he doesn't make anyone better. Great shooter, decent rebounder, lax-defender, horrible at keeping his teammates involved. He really should never be the focal point for a NBA championship aspiring team.

Exactly. I get that he doesn't have a great supporting cast in NY. He certainly doesn't have a Wade or Bosh. But he does have some pieces and being the "superstar" of the team, isn't it up to him to make up for some of the teams deficiencies? That's what the great players do. He sees himself as a top 3-5 player in the league. He can pick up some of the slack. Does he do that? Lets see:

Knicks are undersized and getting killed on the glass by a much bigger Indiana team. So does 6'8 Carmelo who is playing PF go ahead and bang down low and grab at least 10 boards to help his team? No he gets 6 a game.

Ok so the Knicks aren't a great defensive team. Fine. They need some big stops especially in the 4th. Does Carmelo pick up the slack? Umm nope, he gets torched by Lance Stephenson to a career high 26, roughly 20 pts above his average.

Ok fine, so the Knicks don't exactly have a world class PG and their offense can get stagnant. Does Carmelo the superstar pick up the slack and make a point to get his teamates some open looks to get them going? No he has 7 assists in 6 games!!

Does nobody else see this? Sure he doesn't have the greatest supporting cast, but he sees himself as the superstar. He does nothing to make up for any of the teams deficiencies. Nothing at all. Defense and rebounding are all about effort and energy. Maybe hes not a great passer but for such a lethal offensive threat he should be able to find an open man once in a while.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,897
Reaction Score
10,482
Look @ the remaining 4 teams in the playoffs. they all have atleast 2 star level CONSISTENT players. what is Carmelo's number 2? jr smith ? A glorified bench gunner? It's proof Felton stinks when he can't complete a field goal in an elimination game.
you can't ask melo to be lebron-- a top 5 player ever--, he's an all world scorer whose proven can win. gold medals and all. Knicks management is a mess.
 

JaYnYcE

Soul Brother
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,245
Reaction Score
852
It's Patrick Ewing and company all over again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
10,551
Reaction Score
15,946
It's Patrick Ewing and company all over again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No the Ewing teams would destroy this Knicks team and would get to the ECF. Ewing is the greatest Knick of alltime and he would get it done at 40 percent. Your right in the sense that Ewing never had a number 2, until he was very late into his career when he had Spree and Houston. Oakley was probably Ewing's best number 2 most of his career and Oakley was mainly a rebounder, a specialist like Chandler. Those knicks teams had over achievers like Starks and Mase. Ewing had Mark Jackson earlier in his career. Melo is more talented then Ewing as great as Ewing was he was never considered a top 5 player and Melo is closer to that then Ewing ever was (it was a tougher era back then).

It would not be pretty if the 90s knicks were playing todays Knicks ill tell ya that. The 90s team poured blood onto the court every night.
 

JaYnYcE

Soul Brother
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,245
Reaction Score
852
No the Ewing teams would destroy this Knicks team and would get to the ECF. Ewing is the greatest Knick of alltime and he would get it done at 40 percent. Your right in the sense that Ewing never had a number 2, until he was very late into his career when he had Spree and Houston. Oakley was probably Ewing's best number 2 most of his career and Oakley was mainly a rebounder, a specialist like Chandler. Those knicks teams had over achievers like Starks and Mase. Ewing had Mark Jackson earlier in his career. Melo is more talented then Ewing as great as Ewing was he was never considered a top 5 player and Melo is closer to that then Ewing ever was (it was a tougher era back then).

It would not be pretty if the 90s knicks were playing todays Knicks ill tell ya that. The 90s team poured blood onto the court every night.

It was a different era. Those 90's Knicks were tough SOBs. I'm glad you saw my point as I wasn't comparing Ewing and Melo side by side. Ewing was a warrior and came to work everyday. I don't feel that way about Melo, or anyone in today's NBA for that matter with the exception of maybe Tim Duncan. It's funny, the Knicks could have had Chris Paul right about now but screwed it up when they signed Chandler.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
879
Reaction Score
685
I appreciate you looking up the stats of both players. Felton averaged closer to 2 TO's per game to Lin's closer to 3. That's always been his problem and Felton taking care of the ball was a big reason why NY lead the league in fewest TO's per game. A huge jump with being last or second to last in that category a year ago.

Also I don't like TS%. I think it's flawed and doesn't tell the true story, no pun intended.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The only stat that matters is when is the last time the Knicks won the championship? When you consider they are one of the top 3 teams wealth wise, that is pathetic.
 

JaYnYcE

Soul Brother
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,245
Reaction Score
852
What happened in 1999 when Ewing was injured? Oh yeah, they made it to the Finals.

Come on man, that was an eight seed who caught fire and ran into the twin towers of Duncan and Robinson. That was a great run but those Knicks were greatly overmatched.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

JaYnYcE

Soul Brother
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,245
Reaction Score
852
The only stat that matters is when is the last time the Knicks won the championship? When you consider they are one of the top 3 teams wealth wise, that is pathetic.

Your attempt at trying to be cute is pathetic. 1973 isn't a statistic.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
879
Reaction Score
685
Your attempt at trying to be cute is pathetic. 1973 isn't a statistic.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Like I said, when big city big money teams like the Yankees, Dodgers, Lakers, Knicks etc. go 40 years without a title it is a pathetic situation. What is the Knick's excuse?
 

JaYnYcE

Soul Brother
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,245
Reaction Score
852
Like I said, when big city big money teams like the Yankees, Dodgers, Lakers, Knicks etc. go 40 years without a title it is a pathetic situation. What is the Knick's excuse?

Larry Bird, Michael Jordan and now Lebron James.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

JaYnYcE

Soul Brother
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,245
Reaction Score
852
James Dolan and Isaiah Thomas.

That Dolan, the incompetent son, came later on. He wasn't around for the early to mid 90's Knicks. Just look at the list off of the top of my head of the hall of famers that MJ prevented from getting a ring:

Ewing
Barkley
Karl Malone
Stockton
Drexler
Reggie Miller


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

8893

Curiouser
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,851
Reaction Score
96,512
That Dolan, the incompetent son, came later on. He wasn't around for the early to mid 90's Knicks.
Understood, but if you're accounting for all the years since their last championship and identifying those most responsible, at a minimum you have to attribute the years between the end of Jordan's dominance and last season to Dolan and Thomas. And it wouldn't be unfair to lay the blame at their feet for the fact that LeBron never even seriously considered the Knicks, because these two clowns made the franchise look like a joke with no easy path to a championship. In that sense, they are still the ones most responsible.
 
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
879
Reaction Score
685
Understood, but if you're accounting for all the years since their last championship and identifying those most responsible, at a minimum you have to attribute the years between the end of Jordan's dominance and last season to Dolan and Thomas. And it wouldn't be unfair to lay the blame at their feet for the fact that LeBron never even seriously considered the Knicks, because these two clowns made the franchise look like a joke with no easy path to a championship. In that sense, they are still the ones most responsible.
You can account for it anyway you want, but they are arguably the richest franchise in the NBA and haven't won a championship in 40 years. They suck, their owners sucks, their management sucks, their coaching sucks, their players suck, or some combination of the above. My only point is they are pathetic.
 

JaYnYcE

Soul Brother
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,245
Reaction Score
852
You can account for it anyway you want, but they are arguably the richest franchise in the NBA and haven't won a championship in 40 years. They suck, their owners sucks, their management sucks, their coaching sucks, their players suck, or some combination of the above. My only point is they are pathetic.

Hey it beats the 80 years of "bad luck" the Red Sox went through prior to 2004. Wait, no the "curse" I meant. Didn't that have something to do with a piano? That wasn't pathetic at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

JaYnYcE

Soul Brother
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,245
Reaction Score
852
wow this made me laugh. At you. Not with you.

Yes because Bernard King didn't have Bird in his way, Ewing didn't have Jordan in his way and Melo now doesn't have LeBron. None of this happened or had happened in the past.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

pepband99

Resident TV nerd
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,718
Reaction Score
9,513
daily Knicks update - they still suck, and have since 1972. Next.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2012
Messages
4,634
Reaction Score
9,912
Yes because Bernard King didn't have Bird in his way, Ewing didn't have Jordan in his way and Melo now doesn't have LeBron. None of this happened or had happened in the past.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Knicks were bounced by those players I believe 4 times in the last 40 years, what is your excuse for the other 36?

Wake up, your act is tired. The Knicks success, or lack their of, can be seen as nothing but a joke given their location, money and fan base.
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,527
Reaction Score
19,517
Yes because Bernard King didn't have Bird in his way, Ewing didn't have Jordan in his way and Melo now doesn't have LeBron. None of this happened or had happened in the past.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Knicks have have been a collection of individuals for a long time. With the exception of the "Lost Jordan Years," they would consistently lose to other teams.

You can't blame Bird for King's short comings. The Celtics won exactly 1 championship when he was a healthy Knick. THe Knicks were terrible anyhow in the early 80's.

As for a "daily update," They lost over the weekend. The updates should stop. On the other hand, It would be kinda humorous for someone to remind you of this fact every day for the next 5 months.
 

JaYnYcE

Soul Brother
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,245
Reaction Score
852
daily Knicks update - they still suck, and have since 1972. Next.

They won in 1973 though. Man, history is easy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
542
Guests online
5,034
Total visitors
5,576

Forum statistics

Threads
157,122
Messages
4,084,329
Members
9,979
Latest member
Texasfan01


Top Bottom