- Joined
- May 27, 2015
- Messages
- 14,479
- Reaction Score
- 97,497
Our team had 20 turnovers and he had 0. That's the thing about good decisions, they're way less obvious than bad onesShow me his good decisions today with 0 points and 0 assists?
Our team had 20 turnovers and he had 0. That's the thing about good decisions, they're way less obvious than bad onesShow me his good decisions today with 0 points and 0 assists?
Very well said.The problem then is his only option would be to bench AG at the end - in which case you’re asking for the team to just turn the ball over. Gaffney very clearly is not comfortable enough to have the ball in his hands in a tight game. Hell he wants to get the ball out before he gets to half court.
Gilbert is quite literally the only guy that can take is man off the dribble. The only guard that puts space between his defender because they have to respect his handle and the drive. It’s what he does after breaking his man down that is his biggest weakness. But the fact of it is that he’s the only one.
When you defer to other players because you’re timid and every shot you’ve taken in the game has been blocked it’s easy to have 0 turnoversOur team had 20 turnovers and he had 0. That's the thing about good decisions, they're way less obvious than bad ones
You bench AG at the end. Why the hell is Hurley going back to what we had before? All Gilbert has shown he's comfortable at the end of games is forcing things and getting swallowed up by the trees. We've seen it in every single close game.The problem then is his only option would be to bench AG at the end - in which case you’re asking for the team to just turn the ball over. Gaffney very clearly is not comfortable enough to have the ball in his hands in a tight game. Hell he wants to get the ball out before he gets to half court.
Gilbert is quite literally the only guy that can take is man off the dribble. The only guard that puts space between his defender because they have to respect his handle and the drive. It’s what he does after breaking his man down that is his biggest weakness. But the fact of it is that he’s the only one.
When we had a guy that could break you down and then know what to do with the ball is when we won these types of games. Hurley desperately needs that from Cole, Bouk or Gaffney next year.
If you think we would’ve won the game with Gaffney in at the end over Gilbert, I can’t help you.
You bench AG at the end. Why the hell is Hurley going back to what we had before? All Gilbert has shown he's comfortable at the end of games is forcing things and getting swallowed up by the trees. We've seen it in every single close game.
We simply don't know. We do know what happens with a AG Vital backcourt at the end of every close game.I don’t blame your frustration I just don’t think the alternatives this year get us a better result.
I mean it’s too late now but he should be having Taliek work all day with him on playmaking after getting to the second level of the defense.
You can’t win games when you shoot 30% no matter who the pg isWe might have, might not have. But I do know that we're going to lose if Gilbert's in there.
We might have, might not have. But I do know that we're going to lose if Gilbert's in there.
Then came the last 4 minutes...Were we watching the same game? Gaffney did zero all game. AG hit a few shots and made some nice plays. I’ve been as big an AG detractor than anyone but what’s right is right - he was WAY better than Gaffney today.
Ok so what about 30% from the field? Do we blame that on AG alsoThen came the last 4 minutes...
Then came the last 4 minutes...
AgreedThat’s fine, and I agree. But people are bashing Dan Hurley for having him in the game. The previous 36 minutes AG >>>>>>> JG.
Were we watching the same game? Gaffney did zero all game. AG hit a few shots and made some nice plays. I’ve been as big an AG detractor as anyone but what’s right is right - he was WAY better than Gaffney today.
Over the final 4 minutes, AG took 2 shots. One was a runner with 2 seconds left on the shot clock. The other was a layup attempt with 48 seconds left that gets called a foul 9 times out of 10 and is literally the only thing you want any PG to do in that situation.Then came the last 4 minutes...
We simply don't know. We do know what happens with a AG Vital backcourt at the end of every close game.
No, I thought he played about as well as he could for this version of AG for the middle of part of the game but I never want him and CV on the court together to close out games.Ok so what about 30% from the field? Do we blame that on AG also
Very well put!Over the final 4 minutes, AG took 2 shots. One was a runner with 2 seconds left on the shot clock. The other was a layup attempt with 48 seconds left that gets called a foul 9 times out of 10 and is literally the only thing you want any PG to do in that situation.
What exactly did you see in the several times he deferred to another option late in this game that would make you pin this loss on AG’s final 4 minutes? Oh, right, absolutely nothing except a constant need for him to be blamed.
We actually could have still won this game while shooting 30% though.You can’t win games when you shoot 30% no matter who the pg is
That's the worst possible play you can ever get in that situation? What's the success rate on that, 5%? Mignt as well draw up a three for Carlton.The other was a layup attempt with 48 seconds left that gets called a foul 9 times out of 10 and is literally the only thing you want any PG to do in that situation.
Well who do you put then when you’re down 4 with a minute to go? Who on this team is going to score?No, I thought he played about as well as he could for this version of AG for the middle of part of the game but I never want him and CV on the court together to close out games.
And that in itself is pathetic. We shoot 40% and we are up 10-15We actually could have still won this game while shooting 30% though.