Flagrant aside, Dickinson pushed off (2 arms extended into the defender's back) and traveled (caught the ball, pivoted, hopped, then dribbled) on the last shot
I'm fine with the push off going uncalled because that seems like a weak call to end the game, but definitely shuffled his feet before the shot
Absolutely.
Classic example of it being the right call according to the rules, which means the rules should be looked at
TCU guy clearly swings his arm out and hits Hunter's face. Doesn't matter at that point if it's a forearm or an elbow, an arm was swung and made contact with the face. That is almost always called a flagrant
Maybe the rule needs to be reviewed to include intention. Because it's obvious there was no intention to hit the guy in the face. Also maybe if the victim flopped or not should be taken into consideration..
I came here with this question, which has been unmentioned until the above.
I honestly do not know if the rule has been adjusted in the past 2-3 years, but I thought that it had then been at the standard that any direct contact above the shoulder was required to be called a flagrant, irrespective of whether it was malicious, intentional, etc.
Some further disclosure:
The elbow was visually flat, and it did strike Dickinson.
It looked like an unnecessary if not uncommon, volitional 'extra' by Udeh, though my understanding is that such determination is outside of the equation. I bring this up because some might consider it an unfortunate unforced error by Udeh.
I don't like particularly Dickinson, so I can relate to the enmity here.
I don't like that Kansas regularly enjoys what looks like friendly AFH reffing.
I do think that the KU win is helpful to UConn.
Is anyone here able and willing to weigh in as to whether there has been any recent evolution with how the rule is currently written?