I figured there must have been some kind of time constraint. I couldn't figure out any other reason why, given Manuel's history, it wouldn't be at least logical to include him and get his input. And while he didn't interview formallly before Firday, by most accounts he was the preferred candidate for quite a while, so I'm pretty sure there had been at least informal communications with UCONN prior to Friday. And it just seems to me that you build your strongest case, regardless of the NCAA's potential action, and our case would have been that much stronger had we been able to say that we have appointed a new AD who is uniquely experienced in dealing with this issue (oh, and by the way, he's a minority...it never hurts to work ont he white guilt, especially of academics, lol) and then recap his UB experience...