- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,922
- Reaction Score
- 4,488
If you will read my later response, I mainly blame the A.D.s for not having the nerve to do what they should have done.... keep the series going.
Nerve? You serious? Pat Summit?
If you will read my later response, I mainly blame the A.D.s for not having the nerve to do what they should have done.... keep the series going.
Stop blaming the ADs, plural, and you've finally got a defensible position, at least theoretically. To what end, I don't know.
Pat Summitt was the one who ended the series, as several folks have accurately informed you. As for your "more than one person is responsible:"
Yeah. You can add Summitt's staff, who went along with her. Surprise, surprise. Can just imagine them saying, "Forget it, Pat. Don't be such a jealous janet."
You can argue that the Tennessee AD should have stopped her.
Should have, that is, as viewed by you from on high. It was out of the question in the real world, where the power dynamics and relationship were such that there was no freakin' way.
Tennessee had a separate women's AD, Joan Cronan, until the AD's were merged last June. Summitt was the tail wagging the Tennessee women's athletics department, and Cronan was women's AD for 29 of Summitt's 38 years as coach.
Cronan: "We've always laughed because I wanted her to coach as long as she could, because she was a pretty good AD when she was coaching." (WBIR.com, 5/2/12)
So much for the Tennessee AD should've cracked the whip on Pat. She not only didn't crack it, she wrote the accusatory "we'd prefer to remain anonymous" poison pen letter about UConn to the SEC.
Turning to UConn, you can't plausibly argue the UConn AD, whether or not possessed of nerve, or anyone else on the UConn side, had the ability to keep the series going when Summitt decided it would end.
So, you're left with the abstract proposition that an AD should be the boss of a coach (and should, incidentally, have seen it your way). Fair enough, provided you recognize that, in reality, it isn't always the case (see, e.g., Paterno, J. and Summitt, P.)
And that's why people have a problem with your both-sides-were-to-blame sally. Whatever your reason for advancing it, it suffers from the appreciable defect of being unsupportable.
Yes, more than one person is responsible.I guess I will end my participation in this by stating that more than one person is responsible. If you will read my later response, I mainly blame the A.D.s for not having the nerve to do what they should have done.... keep the series going. Coaches don't(or shouldn't) run the athletic departments.
Well that might, but only might, be worth it.I actually love the idea of Pat being required to sit and watch while her team of Big Mac all-stars is ripped open and demolished on National TV.

Well then you might be a little slow.Nope
Yea, actually, they are not even particularly found of us.The Boneyard - unlike the Summitt, this site has no affiliation or direct connection to the Uconn coaching staff.
Not so sure about that. There were Summitteers of longer standing than MMC who also had access to Summitt and whose noses were pressed closer to the BY window. Of course it may have been a joint effort. Teamwork and all that.I doubt anyone on Summitt's staff reads The Boneyard, but Maria certainly did. Please tell me who else would have let Summitt know what was discussed here, who else would have made copies of 30+ pages of posts from The Boneyard for use in the complaint to the NCAA about Uconn's alleged recruiting violations?
Not so sure about that. There were Summitteers of longer standing than MMC who also had access to Summitt and whose noses were pressed closer to the BY window.
As far as her monitoring you, she had various snitches reporting in. You ensured a high employment rate in that sector.
How did my wife get involved?DD, we all report to someone concerning you.
How did my wife get involved?
Stop blaming the ADs, plural, and you've finally got a defensible position, at least theoretically. To what end, I don't know.
Pat Summitt was the one who ended the series, as several folks have accurately informed you. As for your "more than one person is responsible:"
Yeah. You can add Summitt's staff, who went along with her. Surprise, surprise. Can just imagine them saying, "Forget it, Pat. Don't be such a jealous janet."
You can argue that the Tennessee AD should have stopped her.
Should have, that is, as viewed by you from on high. It was out of the question in the real world, where the power dynamics and relationship were such that there was no freakin' way.
Tennessee had a separate women's AD, Joan Cronan, until the AD's were merged last June. Summitt was the tail wagging the Tennessee women's athletics department, and Cronan was women's AD for 29 of Summitt's 38 years as coach.
Cronan: "We've always laughed because I wanted her to coach as long as she could, because she was a pretty good AD when she was coaching." (WBIR.com, 5/2/12)
So much for the Tennessee AD should've cracked the whip on Pat. She not only didn't crack it, she wrote the accusatory "we'd prefer to remain anonymous" poison pen letter about UConn to the SEC.
Turning to UConn, you can't plausibly argue the UConn AD, whether or not possessed of nerve, or anyone else on the UConn side, had the ability to keep the series going when Summitt decided it would end.
So, you're left with the abstract proposition that an AD should be the boss of a coach (and should, incidentally, have seen it your way). Fair enough, provided you recognize that, in reality, it isn't always the case (see, e.g., Paterno, J. and Summitt, P.)
And that's why people have a problem with your both-sides-were-to-blame sally. Whatever your reason for advancing it, it suffers from the appreciable defect of being unsupportable.

Are you mad at me because of my lawyer joke?With talk like that, I'm adding a results premium to your bill.
Ouch! Are you referring to my mental acuity or speed in the 100 meter butterfly? I've enjoyed your posts in the past and probably will in the future, but I thought you were above childish insults toward someone who doesn't share your opinion.Well then you might be a little slow.
It's all still a darned shame. Huskies-Lady Vols was the one time that wbb could move to the top of the stack without the "sports fans" feeling a need to protect their genitalia by denouncing the entire sport, all those who participate, and suggesting that those of us who love it simply don't exist. Even "sports fans" were capable of recognizing and respecting the genuine rivalry game, the contest of legendary programs, and in the absence of their hoots of derision, wbb was able to be judged on its own merits, and as such tended to be generally well-received by the wider public. There was nothing better for the sport, and thus a very very good thing for those of us who love it. It's terribly sad that the University of Tennessee feels the need to make the product of Pat's dementia a matter of university policy, to the general detriment of wbb. It does, after all, go directly against everything Pat in her healthy years strove to build.
Well that's mainly because of all those weird pictures of the Huskies that Biff and others have posted. Maybe if we all just sneak up on Geno and muss his hair like Stewie does he'll start to like the BY a little.Yea, actually, they are not even particularly found of us.
Better to make a lawyer joke than to be a lawyer joke.Are you mad at me because of my lawyer joke?