- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 1,490
- Reaction Score
- 10,876
You're looking at straight percentages. Divide the difference in percentage by Dyson's percentage and you get the 10%.How is Vital roughly 10% better over his career? Are you talking FT%? I’ll give you that.
honestly hate looking at things that aren’t apples to apples like this bc as noted 3pt line was different not to mention style of play and competition.
but just from raw numbers the differences are:
FG% is about 1% nope 39% vs 40%
3PT% is about 3.5% borderline
2PT% is about 4% probably
TS% is about 5.4% I don’t have the time to check significance for this as it is an amalgamation of other shooting numbers and I have a job and family.
FT% is close to 10% so yeah
If Dyson was a 35% shooter and Vital was a 38.5% shooter it'd be 38.5-35 = 3.5/35 = 10%.
If Vital one season was a 30% shooter and he increased his number to 40% the next season, he increased his shooting by 33% over the last season.