bags27 - I agree about DD if she had gone somewhere with a strong coaching staff - her raw skills are impressive, but since she has been in college I have never been impressed including her freshman year where she got all the accolades - she was the least efficient player on the UNC team by quite a bit - she has never shot more than about 40% from the field and about 30% from three and has had stretches where those percentages were a lot worse. She has never had a 1.0 A/TO ratio, usually coming in around 0.75-0.80 - and she has always dominated the ball for her teams, shooting 30% of the teams shots and usually about 40% more than her nearest teammate both from 3 and overall.
The word that they are trying to 'install' a motion offense to me is hard to believe - I have seen nothing from this TN coaching staff that suggests anyone there has more than a very rudimentary handle on defensive or offensive 'theory' - it appears they learned what 'setting a screen' means, and then went for the advanced degree on this new fangled concept called a pick and roll - they worked really hard on that and think they have it down, but didn't think they could really get through the doctorate level degree that included something called a pick and pop. At the other end they figured out what a defensive stance looks like and teach it strenuously, and they understand the idea of boxing out. This zone concept things is a little difficult, but they are working hard on it, but haven't quite figured out the difference between 2-1-2, 1-2-2, 2-3, and 3-2. They understand that it all adds up to five, but ... haven't figured out why five is a magic number.
That last bit may also explain why they have had such a hard time understanding any of the books and videos about playing offense against a zone - they all keep using that strange sequence of numbers with this mystical total of 5.
Sarcastic, but ...?