- Joined
- Mar 21, 2021
- Messages
- 2,970
- Reaction Score
- 14,001
I was thinking about teams that had this many hs AA. Unverified...maybe UCONN and ND. And most unlikely, division 2, Cheney State.
UCLA is another possibility. They have the top three ranked players from 2022 class (Betts, Rice, Barker) plus many other top 25 recruits from various classes.I was thinking about teams that had this many hs AA. Unverified...maybe UCONN and ND. And most unlikely, division 2, Cheney State.
Hard to believe Dawn has only had 1 #1 recruit in her career - A’ja.UCLA is another possibility. They have the top three ranked players from 2022 class (Betts, Rice, Barker) plus many other top 25 recruits from various classes.
UConn has three #1 overall recruits on its roster with Bueckers, Fudd and Strong -- which should be a merit unto itself.
It's hard to tell, they really haven't played anyone.The answer to has anyone ever is almost always: Yes, UConn.
I came into season thinking that LSU is on another tier from Oklahoma, and I'm not sure I have changed my mind.
I'd be surprised though if the LSU game went to wire at CLA.
It certainly seems as though Feagin and Edwards are turning the corner on comfort.
The only players on lsu roster that has played in the CLA before is Smith and Flau’jae. That’s when they lost by 24. I suspect they’ll be more level this time but the team as a whole will definitely feel the shock of that environment. Playing against 18,000, a 68 home game win streak, and the #2 team in the country will be tough for any team to overcome.LSU has. Experience playing SC and playing them in CLA. Kim and her veterans won’t be as shell shocked by the crowd as Texas and Oklahoma were.
And SaMyah has regressed pretty badlyThe only players on lsu roster that has played in the CLA before is Smith and Flau’jae. That’s when they lost by 24. I suspect they’ll be more level this time but the team as a whole will definitely feel the shock of that environment. Playing against 18,000, a 68 home game win streak, and the #2 team in the country will be tough for any team to overcome.
I agree, which means they aren't really a cream of the crop team.
I agree with this. It's a long season for a reason!I think they will be by March. Seeding is earned for play during the entire season. Titles are won by the team playing the best right then. UConn is starting 2 freshmen and a transfer. They will be playing their best in March/April.
Don’t underestimate Mulkey, one of the game’s elite coaches (her, Geno, and Dawn) and recruiters. No, LSU has played a weak schedule, but she knows that. She’ll have them ready. LSU can’t match our bench, and that means their starting five will play an average of 30+ minutes. We’re coming off a 41 point beatdown of a ranked team, and I am concerned we might be a little overconfident, but Dawn knows who’s she’s coaching against, and I trust the message at practice this week will have that in mind.The only players on lsu roster that has played in the CLA before is Smith and Flau’jae. That’s when they lost by 24. I suspect they’ll be more level this time but the team as a whole will definitely feel the shock of that environment. Playing against 18,000, a 68 home game win streak, and the #2 team in the country will be tough for any team to overcome.
It's a rotation of Smith, Wolfenbarger and Morrow v. Kitts, Feagin and Joyce.And SaMyah has regressed pretty badly
Kitts, Feagin and Joyce could easily combine for 50-60 points alone
They may have the worst bench of the entire SEC.Had the pleasure of meeting Brenda Paul, former WBB HC at Miss St., Georgia State, and Elon, who happened to be sitting behind me at the OU game. Her words when we started talking about LSU, “They have no bench.”
So when they barely beat teams (Washington, Stanford, and Vanderbilt) that they should've soundly defeated, does that mean that the elite coach didn't properly prepare her teams and underestimated her team's opponents? Sorry--I don't get this logic.Don’t underestimate Mulkey, one of the game’s elite coaches (her, Geno, and Dawn) and recruiters. No, LSU has played a weak schedule, but she knows that. She’ll have them ready. LSU can’t match our bench, and that means their starting five will play an average of 30+ minutes. We’re coming off a 41 point beatdown of a ranked team, and I am concerned we might be a little overconfident, but Dawn knows who’s she’s coaching against, and I trust the message at practice this week will have that in mind.
LSU is a very talented team filled with a bunch of ball hogger stat chasers. They do not play as a a team, half of them are chasing their own stats and refuse to pass the ball. ‘Ball hog’ Johnson in particular is the most egregious one with her mom going on Twitter encouraging her to not pass the ball so much. Anyone who has seen them play this year knows exactly what I’m talking about.So when they barely beat teams (Washington, Stanford, and Vanderbilt) that they should've soundly defeated, does that mean that the elite coach didn't properly prepare her teams and underestimated her team's opponents? Sorry--I don't get this logic.
I don't think that LSU is being underestimated. I think people are realizing that they just don't pass the eye test. If the game is closer than usual, it won't be because Kim is a coaching genius. It'll be largely because her elite players are playing at an elite level while ours are playing a cut below. Kim ain't entering CLA with a bunch of two stars. She's got two legit SEC POY/All-American candidates.
My opinion: you don’t win four natties by accident. She’ll go about seven players deep for the vast majority of the 40 minutes, while we’ll probably play ten. Her players will play with tempo, will be aggressive, and if they’re too aggressive, we’ll get to the foul line often.CLA will not bother them… LSU draws pretty well at home, not equal to us, but they’re not playing in a half empty arena.So when they barely beat teams (Washington, Stanford, and Vanderbilt) that they should've soundly defeated, does that mean that the elite coach didn't properly prepare her teams and underestimated her team's opponents? Sorry--I don't get this logic.
I don't think that LSU is being underestimated. I think people are realizing that they just don't pass the eye test. If the game is closer than usual, it won't be because Kim is a coaching genius. It'll be largely because her elite players are playing at an elite level while ours are playing a cut below. Kim ain't entering CLA with a bunch of two stars. She's got two legit SEC POY/All-American candidates.
I do agree that LSU has a bunch of stat chasers (and the one you named here is one of the most egregious of them all). Where I disagree is about Kim's status as an elite coach. I think she's elite, which is why the suggestion that we shouldn't underestimate her is a little much.LSU is a very talented team filled with a bunch of ball hogger stat chasers. They do not play as a a team, half of them are chasing their own stats and refuse to pass the ball. ‘Ball hog’ Johnson in particular is the most egregious one with her mom going on Twitter encouraging her to not pass the ball so much. Anyone who has seen them play this year knows exactly what I’m talking about.
When you have a team who plays individual basketball instead of team basketball you get a mediocre product comprised of close games not maximizing your talent and vulnerability to lots of potential losses
And Kim isn’t an elite coach, Vic is 10x the coach she is and you could make a case a couple of other SEC coaches are far superior to her. She just lands big talent, that’s it
My point is that Kim is not an underdog and neither is her team. That schtick is outdated, and I'm beyond thrilled that it didn't work last season (her team horribly mismanaged the gigantic target they had on their backs). She could pull that nonsense at Baylor in 2005 (despite having a first team AA/2006 first round pick/future HOFer with San Antonio) but wasn't able to do it beyond then for that program. It's not like you can have Brittney Griner for four years and claim underdog status. Seems like when you build a program to elite status, you can't claim the "underdog" role without being mercilessly derided. Brenda Frese found that out the hard way post-2006.My opinion: you don’t win four natties by accident. She’ll go about seven players deep for the vast majority of the 40 minutes, while we’ll probably play ten. Her players will play with tempo, will be aggressive, and if they’re too aggressive, we’ll get to the foul line often.CLA will not bother them… LSU draws pretty well at home, not equal to us, but they’re not playing in a half empty arena.
What will get us the win is defense. In a battle of attrition, our bench beats their bench. We’ll probably get a rematch with them in the SEC tournament.
Living in Texas for the better part of 30 years, I followed her Baylor teams when they gave her the HC job. Her coaching style hasn’t changed over those years, and neither has her personal style… annoyingly abrasive. She won three natties at Baylor, and then another at LSU. Has a chip on her shoulder the size of an anvil. Practically begs to get a technical foul with her histrionics on the bench. It’s all calculated to give her team an “us against the world” mentality. I think we win by 10.