My opinion: you don’t win four natties by accident. She’ll go about seven players deep for the vast majority of the 40 minutes, while we’ll probably play ten. Her players will play with tempo, will be aggressive, and if they’re too aggressive, we’ll get to the foul line often.CLA will not bother them… LSU draws pretty well at home, not equal to us, but they’re not playing in a half empty arena.So when they barely beat teams (Washington, Stanford, and Vanderbilt) that they should've soundly defeated, does that mean that the elite coach didn't properly prepare her teams and underestimated her team's opponents? Sorry--I don't get this logic.
I don't think that LSU is being underestimated. I think people are realizing that they just don't pass the eye test. If the game is closer than usual, it won't be because Kim is a coaching genius. It'll be largely because her elite players are playing at an elite level while ours are playing a cut below. Kim ain't entering CLA with a bunch of two stars. She's got two legit SEC POY/All-American candidates.
What will get us the win is defense. In a battle of attrition, our bench beats their bench. We’ll probably get a rematch with them in the SEC tournament.
Living in Texas for the better part of 30 years, I followed her Baylor teams when they gave her the HC job. Her coaching style hasn’t changed over those years, and neither has her personal style… annoyingly abrasive. She won three natties at Baylor, and then another at LSU. Has a chip on her shoulder the size of an anvil. Practically begs to get a technical foul with her histrionics on the bench. It’s all calculated to give her team an “us against the world” mentality. I think we win by 10.
Morrow in foul trouble would really hurt them though.
