meyers7
You Talkin’ To Me?
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 24,194
- Reaction Score
- 64,473
Not always. It could cause one to alter their shot.Trying to block a shot accomplishes nothing.
Not always. It could cause one to alter their shot.Trying to block a shot accomplishes nothing.
I have no idea why and neither do you. Your rational is a bad as his/her picking Tennessee in the first place.
Duke can compete. Maybe. You don't mind if I see how well Carter plays, how well the freshman adapt to college ball and how TN plays without Spani and Williams?
From this Uconn fan, I can think of no rational reason to select TN over Uconn in a ore-season poll.
Not always. It could cause one to alter their shot.
I know.In the context we're discussing here, i.e. the talent of a player, trying is not relevant.
What are you some right wing whacko?Did you ever hear a player analysis list trying to do something as a positive? It's the doing that counts.

Well the BCS standings, the thing that really counts for football does not come into play until well into the season.Even though I think not voting UConn #1 pre-season is ridiculous, I think pre-season polls are more ridiculous. Every year, in both hoops and football, the pre-season rankings lay out a false road map that usually takes, in hoops, at least 10 if not more games to shake out. Teams perform better or worse than expected. I'd rather see polls start at game 10 for hoops and 4 for football. At least hoops has the virtue of a real championship tournament where rankings at best earn a few wins.
What's an ore-season poll?
Well the BCS standings, the thing that really counts for football does not come into play until well into the season.
And I don't see anything wrong with the preseason polls. It's just where people think the teams are. Things change as the season goes along. Doesn't mean the #1 team is going to win the NC, they are just considered #1 at this time (this week, etc.).
But it's much more impressive to beat the 2nd ranked Duke, than just plain ole Duke.The problem, if problem is the right word, is that it takes a long time for the polls to reflect actual performance. Unlike political polls which give a fix on attitudes and only one event to show actual performance,, sports give immediate , on going results. So with 0 games played, the only basis for a poll is pure guess work even if there is some historical info, like the previous year or departed or new players, used to make the guess. Obviously sports polls give fans something to talk about and coaches and writers a chance to say something about teams they've never actually seen. But there are worse things in the world to fret about. We don't need polls to tell us, barring injury, that this UConn team should be the toughest out in the country.

But it's much more impressive to beat the 2nd ranked Duke, than just plain ole Duke.
Besides you gotta sell all those #1 fingers. You trying to put those guys outta business?
I agree. All other sports have a playoff system. All other divisions do.Far be it from me to stop anyone from giving Duke a finger (although I have my own special candidate for that honor ).
Btw, meant to say on the BCS system, while i agree that it uses actual results, we all know that it still really doesn't compare apples to apples. It certainly does a reasonable job of identifying the top teams, but so can you and I. There is no way that system can take, say 4 unbeaten teams from 4 top conferences and know which team is #1 and #2. Until a real playoff system is used, all we know is that only 2 of the top 4 or 8 teams get to claim a championship as determined by a computer system.
I agree.I agree. All other sports have a playoff system. All other divisions do.
However, if I had my way, I'd dump the BCS, go back to polls and a mythical champion and have the old Bowl structure, all on New Years Day. But that's just me being nostalgic.
I know.
What are you some right wing whacko?![]()