OT: - US Open: Oakmont. What Are Your Thoughts? Who Do You Have? | Page 3 | The Boneyard

OT: US Open: Oakmont. What Are Your Thoughts? Who Do You Have?

I know of a pro who is as they all are a well under scratch golfer who qualified and plays Korn Ferry and South America. He averages 305 on his drives and shot +12 for the first 2 rounds and missed the cut. Just like Mikkelson. 1 person shot under par and 10,000 people tried qualifying to play there, so they made it harder. It’s ridiculously, crazy difficult. This is not anything like the golf we all attempt to play but equipment has gotten better and scoring hasn’t shown it here so are they making it longer and more difficult especially the rough?
The folks who ran Oakmont back in the 70s were horrified Johnny Miller could come there and shoot a 63. Ever since that time, they've gone out of their way to make sure it could never happen again.

I believe Tiger's best score at Oakmont was +6.
 
The folks who ran Oakmont back in the 70s were horrified Johnny Miller could come there and shoot a 63. Ever since that time, they've gone out of their way to make sure it could never happen again.

I believe Tiger's best score at Oakmont was +6.
The membership at Oakmont or any other US Open have no say in how the course is set up.
The USGA works directly with the Course Superintendent to set up the course conditions. If Oakmont decided they wanted to cut the rough to 2” or let it grow to 8” it wouldn’t matter. The USGA director of Agronomy makes that call and every call leading to the Open. They have been making adjustments to the course since Oakmont was last awarded the Open. There is a reason that these courses are chosen 8-10 years in advance of hosting.
 
Your driver head is not screwed in :confused: the hosel is epoxied and you most likely have a driver where you can adjust loft angles as well as to compensate for a draw or fade.
The pros are not using an adjustable driver head. Their clubs are custom built for their exact swing.
That’s not true for all of them. We recently saw Griffin screwing and locking in his driver right on the first tee I believe in Canada and the announcers mentioned it. I’m sure there’s plenty who use the adjustable drives. In that case the only epoxy issues would be grip change.
 
The folks who ran Oakmont back in the 70s were horrified Johnny Miller could come there and shoot a 63. Ever since that time, they've gone out of their way to make sure it could never happen again.

I believe Tiger's best score at Oakmont was +6.
He finished 2nd tied with Furyck that year at +6 the year Cabrera won. No one “tames” that menace of a course but the course played fairly easy day 1 this year because of conditions being fairly soft especially the greens.
 
Your driver head is not screwed in :confused: the hosel is epoxied and you most likely have a driver where you can adjust loft angles as well as to compensate for a draw or fade.
The pros are not using an adjustable driver head. Their clubs are custom built for their exact swing.
The majority of PGA Tour golfers use screw on driver heads.
 
He finished 2nd tied with Furyck that year at +6 the year Cabrera won. No one “tames” that menace of a course but the course played fairly easy day 1 this year because of conditions being fairly soft especially the greens.
4 or 5 people shot under par in round 1, that’s playing easy? The average score was almost 74
 
4 or 5 people shot under par in round 1, that’s playing easy? The average score was almost 74

Well 10 exactly were in the red and that was higher than expected. Obviously “easy” was an exaggeration but overall the course was slightly better being soft due to rain. It became what they thought soon thereafter.
 
The membership at Oakmont or any other US Open have no say in how the course is set up.
The USGA works directly with the Course Superintendent to set up the course conditions. If Oakmont decided they wanted to cut the rough to 2” or let it grow to 8” it wouldn’t matter. The USGA director of Agronomy makes that call and every call leading to the Open. They have been making adjustments to the course since Oakmont was last awarded the Open. There is a reason that these courses are chosen 8-10 years in advance of hosting.
It's a ridiculously difficult course when the US Open isn't there. Rough is 1.5"-2" shorter, greens are 13 on the Stimpmeter instead of 14.5-15. Other than that, it's the same course.
 
It's a ridiculously difficult course when the US Open isn't there. Rough is 1.5"-2" shorter, greens are 13 on the Stimpmeter instead of 14.5-15. Other than that, it's the same course.
no doubt, the USGA could call Oakmont and that course could host the US open any day of the week
 
It's a ridiculously difficult course when the US Open isn't there. Rough is 1.5"-2" shorter, greens are 13 on the Stimpmeter instead of 14.5-15. Other than that, it's the same course.
I’ve never played there but know someone who did. He said he had no fun at all. He is a 7-8 handicap and struggled to break 100. Brutal rough, fast greens with lots of slope that if you miss a downhill putt you are probably chipping your next one. Greens that slope away. Oh, and he said if you are up against one of those churchpews just hit it sideways and hope.

But I admit it was fun watching the pros look mortal in some ways.
 
Am thrilled for JJ surviving that torture chamber of a golf round! He was a Steady Eddie with a great attitude throughout the adversities he faced in the 1st 6 holes, and came out of the rain delay with a renewed purpose and played to a well deserved victory that will change his life forever!
 
Anyone here make you own with components? Haven’t golfed in 15 years. Played homemade GolfSmith clubs, loved them. Need a new set of irons and woods as I’m sure they’ve improved technology.
 
Anyone here make you own with components? Haven’t golfed in 15 years. Played homemade GolfSmith clubs, loved them. Need a new set of irons and woods as I’m sure they’ve improved technology.
I used to make them. About 20-25 years ago. Still have a lot of components to complete. I decided to try a name brand to see if I was missing something, so I bought used Taylormades. Minimal difference from what I saw. I did notice one thing while researching shafts, and that was spine alignment of the shaft does seem to make a difference. I did a simple manual test, vs doing flowing, etc. The one set I did with the spine pointing to the target was remarkably consistent through all clubs (3-Serah Williams). Unfortunately, they were steel and my graphite shafts were about a club longer, so the grandsons got them. Got my start through the Golfsmith clubbuilding classes (in Norwalk?).
 
I used to make them. About 20-25 years ago. Still have a lot of components to complete. I decided to try a name brand to see if I was missing something, so I bought used Taylormades. Minimal difference from what I saw. I did notice one thing while researching shafts, and that was spine alignment of the shaft does seem to make a difference. I did a simple manual test, vs doing flowing, etc. The one set I did with the spine pointing to the target was remarkably consistent through all clubs (3-Serah Williams). Unfortunately, they were steel and my graphite shafts were about a club longer, so the grandsons got them. Got my start through the Golfsmith clubbuilding classes (in Norwalk?).
Not sure why sandwedge gets named Serah Williams.
 
Not sure why sandwedge gets named Serah Williams.

The mods on this board hate it when posters use acronyms for players names so they have a script to change acronyms in to a player's name.

Check out the Red Sox 2025 thread on the pro sports board. Lots of talk about the Devers trade and how he was willing to be a Dan Hurley but didn't want to play 1B.....

The script automatically changes Designated Hitter (D H) in to Dan Hurley.
 
Anyone here make you own with components? Haven’t golfed in 15 years. Played homemade GolfSmith clubs, loved them. Need a new set of irons and woods as I’m sure they’ve improved technology.
I made a set of wedges and irons from Maltby. Absolutely love them and a fun process to nerd out over for a bit.
 

Online statistics

Members online
32
Guests online
1,459
Total visitors
1,491

Forum statistics

Threads
163,960
Messages
4,376,757
Members
10,168
Latest member
CTFan142


.
..
Top Bottom