- Joined
- Dec 9, 2013
- Messages
- 784
- Reaction Score
- 842
Here's how I view it. The NCAA decided the extra payment on off campus housing and whatever else they did to inadvertently provide a little extra benefit violated what are essentially compensation rules. Someday when we get progressive on this subject to finally realize there should be no compensation limits then there never would be a reason to investigate this kind of nonsense. The future should be that universities can provide unlimited subsidy/ benefit w/o registration of any kind with the NCAA including benefits that could be viewed as cash compensation. Third parties like alumni associations, athletic wear and whatever else type of compensation should be registered using a standard form contract. Lastly, only if more than [30%] of the kids in a given sport discipline violate the compensation registration requirements does a team forfeit a season. No more of this season/record forfeits due to 1 or 2 or 3 bad apples.
Will letting the kids get paid hurt the financials of the schools? Absolutely. Is it far more equitable? Yes. Will it drag down outrageous coaching and administrative salaries...yes it should curb growth. Will it narrow the number of participating D1 schools? probably somewhat over time. Will it hurt non revenue sports? Absolutely, and thats sad, but a reality in a world of finite resources. As it stands today the revenue sport kids are propping up the non revenue sport kids and its been that way for three decardes.
should the athletes be forced to attend classes? If they have to attend them, will they have to pass them?

