This is what Lou has to deal with every game with no calls going her way.
This is what Lou has to deal with every game with no calls going her way.
UConn was called for 16 fouls, Villanova was called for 23. UConn had 23 free throw attempts, Villanova had 12.I have been pretty fair to the refs, but this was a blatant missmatch in fouls. No two ways about it.
A foul is a foul, regardless of the number or total per team.UConn was called for 16 fouls, Villanova was called for 23. UConn had 23 free throw attempts, Villanova had 12.
Is there any chance people could stop complaining about foul calls?
View attachment 84226
I don't care about how many fouls are called. What I care about is the physical things teams get away with against Uconn without consequences.UConn was called for 16 fouls, Villanova was called for 23. UConn had 23 free throw attempts, Villanova had 12.
Is there any chance people could stop complaining about foul calls?
View attachment 84226
No chance. People are presenting actual fouls, hard fouls, that weren't called. Why is that a problem?UConn was called for 16 fouls, Villanova was called for 23. UConn had 23 free throw attempts, Villanova had 12.
Is there any chance people could stop complaining about foul calls?
View attachment 84226
Is there any chance people stop complaining about the officials? No. Foul statistics do not tell the whole story. See my reasoning in this post.UConn was called for 16 fouls, Villanova was called for 23. UConn had 23 free throw attempts, Villanova had 12.
Is there any chance people could stop complaining about foul calls?
View attachment 84226
No chance. People are presenting actual fouls, hard fouls, that weren't called. Why is that a problem?
The problem is very rarely the fouls that ARE called. The problem is almost ALWAYS the fouls that AREN'T called. BTW, we got a lot of those trips to the line when they were fouling intentionally at the end of the game.
We are fans. We have opinions on how games should be called. Debating those opinions is fun. Trying to be "good fans" that fans from other teams "like" or "admire" is boring and dull.
UConn was called for 16 fouls, Villanova was called for 23. UConn had 23 free throw attempts, Villanova had 12.
Is there any chance people could stop complaining about foul calls?
View attachment 84226
UConn was called for 16 fouls, Villanova was called for 23. UConn had 23 free throw attempts, Villanova had 12.
Is there any chance people could stop complaining about foul calls?
But if people are upset at the fouls not being called on Uconn, shouldn't they be allowed to voice that opinion on this site or do all topics and opinions need your approval?UConn was called for 16 fouls, Villanova was called for 23. UConn had 23 free throw attempts, Villanova had 12.
Is there any chance people could stop complaining about foul calls?
View attachment 84226
They are complaining about the non callsUConn was called for 16 fouls, Villanova was called for 23. UConn had 23 free throw attempts, Villanova had 12.
Is there any chance people could stop complaining about foul calls?
View attachment 84226
I think that UCONN decided to play the inside game and got the foul calls and Villanova decided to launch 3s which you almost never get a foul call on. To me the fouls aren't as much an issue because if the refs let them play that favors the team with the weakest bench and UCONN has no bench at this point.UConn was called for 16 fouls, Villanova was called for 23. UConn had 23 free throw attempts, Villanova had 12.
Is there any chance people could stop complaining about foul calls?
View attachment 84226
Disagree. Team with lesser talent has the advantage. By hacking, they level up their talent and team with no bench can't afford to hack or they will be out of players.I think that UCONN decided to play the inside game and got the foul calls and Villanova decided to launch 3s which you almost never get a foul call on. To me the fouls aren't as much an issue because if the refs let them play that favors the team with the weakest bench and UCONN has no bench at this point.
Agree about turnovers, but really now, there aren’t many better teams that UConn hasn’t played.You can't show a picture of a person fighting through a screen and think there won't be a foul. Every screen has a foul on the screener sticking out a body part or the defender being super physical to fight through it. If the refs called that super close neither team would have any players left after the first quarter of the game.
Watch any great defender and you will see tons of holds and lots of physical play. AE beat MS up yesterday which is exactly how you slow down an offense. If you want to complain about something complain about how poorly UCONN takes care of the BB on offense. They had 22 turnovers against a pretty vanilla defense. They absolutely will need to clean that up once they start playing better teams.
This is what Lou has to deal with every game with no calls going her way.
My issue is that posters think Villanova, or any opponent, gets the benefit of ALL uncalled fouls. How many times was Maddy held or knocked down without a foul? A lot, but the people complaining don’t mention that. The refs were horrendous, no doubt about it. Inconsistent and incompetent for long stretches. ‘Nova wasn’t the sole beneficiary of the bad calls, though, but fans here are totally ignoring that to play the victim card.After THAT ref performance?????? Not a chance. They brought it on themselves.
I saw an ad for cheap , online generic Zoloft or Paxil. Given the state of the union/BY you might need to lay in a good supply.My issue is that posters think Villanova, or any opponent, gets the benefit of ALL uncalled fouls. How many times was Maddy held or knocked down without a foul? A lot, but the people complaining don’t mention that. The refs were horrendous, no doubt about it. Inconsistent and incompetent for long stretches. ‘Nova wasn’t the sole beneficiary of the bad calls, though, but fans here are totally ignoring that to play the victim card.
Physical games are the way the sport is evolving. A lot of people here don’t read Twitter but if they did, they’d see the bruises on Cameron Brink, Aliyah Boston, Caitlin Clark, and other star players. If people don’t like that style of play, they should check out D2 or another sport because it’s here to stay.
Knowing that, just the thought that there will be complaints about Our Girls and the mean opponents that beat them up for the years to come is depressing.

I think any coach could put together a newsreel of various snippets of various games of various players of their players getting hacked, shoved, pushed, trampled on, tackled, poked, et al...with no foul being called.Would it be appropriate for UConn women’s video department to put a collection of these physical assaults together to share with the Big East officials’ overseers? Is there any reason they wouldn’t do that?
Although different players were involved, the foul when Olsen shoved Nika into Seigrist was nearly identical to the play where Azzi was injured. Thankfully the result was different.My beef is with head shots and face shots not called. Aaliyah gets the heel of a Nova player in her jaw while dribbling. Her head snaps back and she stops - stunned. The call - travelling on Aaliyah. Later in the game Nika is pushed by Olsen, knocked into Seigrist, and Nika gets the foul. Nika also took an elbow to the face, right in front of the official, and no call. The last one was in the 4th quarter when Caroline was under the basket going for a rebound. Seigrist came over her back, chopped down to slap the ball away and hit Caroline on the head. This caused Caroline to go to the bench and get ice on her neck.
Sorry, but head and face shots need to be called. This type of defensive behavior is not good for the game.
There are many good points in this thread and these should be discussed everywhere and constantly. First, you are absolutely right about how Azzi got injured. And Caroline took a shot to the head right in front of Vasily with no call.Although different players were involved, the foul when Olsen shoved Nika into Seigrist was nearly identical to the play where Azzi was injured. Thankfully the result was different.
When I saw who the refs were instantly I knew we were going to have a poorly called game. One of them is the most inconsistent in Division 1 and we always seem to get stuck with that ref. Isn’t there a way to exclude that ref? You know like lawyers excluding potential jurors.