Few thoughts.
There is a difference in being ranked in the top 25, 10, etc and being a top 25 program. That's typically done over several years or more. He is accurate that UConn has never been a top 25 FB program in spite of being ranked in the top 25 some weeks.
I remember when I brought this up a year or two ago and most here preferred the Big East. LMAO.
Now suddenly people are singing a different tune as they are finally seeing what I pointed out then. The Big East is not sustainable long term for UConn and there is no path for UConn to be an indy in FB long term. The TV exposure and making what 500k for TV.
So what options does UConn have
1. Stay in the BE doing well in BB but slowly seeing the conference decline as NIL takes over. Being the king of a conference most of the country has no idea who is even a member in. FS1 games which is another channel on a slow decline. Making what 6 million for OLY and 500k for FB. 6.5 which is G-5 money. Huge subsidy in spite of success and an AD that can't raise $.
2. Big East with FB in MAC. Not much better but it's an improvement. At least UConn could compete for CC's and hope to be in the new tweener division once the P-4 break away.
3. PAC 2/3 in FB.
4. Big 12 with some sort of FB option, scheduling agreement, etc. With even a few home B12 games the TV deal for UConn FB is a lot more attractive. Full membership in the future is by far the best option for UConn FB. UConn and Gonzaga as Oly members would really make the B12 fun.
5. ACC as a backfill. I do not see them adding UConn now, but if FSU and Clemson leave then UConn, Stanford, Cal, etc become real options. Although I think UConn might be #3 in that scenario as you can't really take just Cal or Stanford, they seem like a package deal. But that also means other ACC members leave IMO so that is a depleted ACC at best. I expect Miami, UNC, Virginia, Ga Tech to go B1G.
At this point the B12 is the best option to play at a high level. The ACC after losing FSU, Clemson, UNC, Virginia, Miami, etc is really not a P-4 conference. It sure seems that ESPN is happy letting the ACC litigate itself to death. ESPN does not view FSU or Clemson as competition for the SEC so they they need to find another hiding spot for them.
IF somehow UConn ended up in a conference with KU, Baylor, Arizona, Houston, WVU, Cinci, maybe even FSU, Clemson, NCSt, Louisville, etc that would be the best possible outcome for UConn IMO.
The real issue is can UConn compete as the ACC was a disaster and this is some of the best AAC teams plus more who have a lot of resources compared to UConn.
Another question to ask is if there is a P-4 breakaway in all sports why would they include the Big East? I can't think of any reason why they would want to share the pie with those teams. That's likely the direction this is going with different levels of compensation for players which is a game UConn does not want to try to keep up with looking at the massive subsidy that already exists and lack of donors willing to pay up for the AD to thrive.