People want UConn to lose in football. The preference is to kill the program. They can’t allow any daylight there as that would open the door to them leaving the Big East.
That is really what this is.
It is not that we WANT them to lose, we ARE just saying that they lose most of the time (< 0.500)
And that doesn’t make them any different from plenty of other P4 schools.It is not that we WANT them to lose, we ARE just saying that they lose most of the time (< 0.500)
And who would pay for that? Fox, who refuses to fund UConn's move because they have us on pennies to the dollar? Or ESPN, who has had two chances to grab the northeast basketball market and said "too rich for my taste"?You would be wrong there.
Let’s say Brett wants nyc market for hoops. They say no to UConn, or UConn basketball people scuttle a move.
He then says, ok let’s take Villanova and St John’s to get a share of the northeast that we can sell for hoops centric contract. Improves hoops, market, doesn’t dilute football.
ACC then loses Florida state or Clemson. They decide to add Navy football and Georgetown basketball to return to the Maryland market.
Things like that is what we are going to see happen, imo.
Imminentlyso when are we joining the Big 12 again?
Eh there are many like you that think if you eliminate FB and the corresponding women's sports that, that money would go to BB. What would most likely happen is the athletic department would shrink budget as part of the cost cutting.It is not that we WANT them to lose, we ARE just saying that they lose most of the time (< 0.500)
In the last year with a full conference distribution (2017-2018) the difference in the losses from football relative to men's basketball was 3.5M... which corresponded to the difference in the cost of the scholarships that UConn charged the athletic department for those two sports. With a conference home, football losses dramatically decrease (and at least for that year, were attributable to the cost of scholarships, not a real expenditure).Agree with everything you’ve said. But you will never convince the ones who will hang on like grim death to the notion we need men’s football. Funny not one of them has any idea how to fix this 70+ year problem.
I don’t know if this would even happen, but what I want to convey is that UConn doesn’t have luxury to pick and choose. You get an offer, you go. You can’t say…well we are a basketball school.This type of doomsday scenario is the only one where UConn should offer itself all sports minus football. Until then, have to at least try and include it.
There are quite a few programs that had to overcome an extensive track record of futility prior to becoming relevant. A perfect case in point is Kansas State.It is not that we WANT them to lose, we ARE just saying that they lose most of the time (< 0.500)
How is it moving anything? You said above from 1969 to 2003 is immaterial. Then what dates count. I went back to include total won lose history. We have lost in more seasons than have won. I don’t consider that immaterial. It’s an unvarnished fact.speaking of football, you're now moving the goalposts.
Really, 40 years is immaterial?1969 to 2003 is immaterial.
You just saw what a modern day UConn football can accomplish 4 days ago.Honestly, thank you for saying that. Nobody is bragging about Yale dominating college football for years except for people at Yale. We need to focus on what a modern day UConn football program can accomplish, and we got a good dose of that during the Big East years just a little more than a decade ago...
Meh. I would look at when it went FBS. Still not good.How is it moving anything? You said above from 1969 to 2003 is immaterial. Then what dates count. I went back to include total won lose history. We have lost in more seasons than have won. I don’t consider that immaterial. It’s an unvarnished fact.
I thought that very thing , then I said “ sure unicorns and a great Maryland term are possible “ Then I regained my composure.Uhm, we shall see. It's also possible that Maryland will be good. They lost to national champion Michigan by only 7 last year so i'm not sure your opinion here is up to date. There is a growing chasm between the P4 and the G5.
Aka 20 minutesImminently
As it should. There is a difference between wishing we could make it so versus the harsh reality of what it is. Would anyone on this thread who believes we should go, outline how we achieve any sort of respectability? Remember, we don’t get any share of the league’s football money to help. Trust me when I say, I would love to have a decent football program but someone needs to show the rest of us how that’s accomplished other than if we don’t go, we’ll be left behind.It seems the beatdown that Uconn FB team received over the weekend has silenced all realignment talks sigh
What additional B12 money?UConn can’t compete with the B12 right now. They need B12 conference name to improve recruiting and the additional B12 money. Then and only then will the start to become competitive.
Yes it would. I guess every league needs doormats. Is that what you’re saying? Do you actually enjoy watching beat downs at the hand of middle of the road opponents? I don’t. Had to turn it off after the first quarter. It only got worse after that.That would make the following schools our peers:
Kansas - 0.342,
Iowa St. - 0.420,
Baylor - 0.442,
Kansas St -0.437,
Big 12 Conference Schools | College Football at Sports-Reference.com
I want them to be successful. Share your salvation plan with us.People want UConn to lose in football. The preference is to kill the program. They can’t allow any daylight there as that would open the door to them leaving the Big East.
That is really what this is.
It’s funny how some people just see things differently.UConn already does compete with other stellar programs except for football. We will never be competitive at that level. Did you all see the terms of the potential offer? No football in the B2 for 7 years. Meaning no football sharing revenue until then. Those who say we need to get a seat at the table now are missing key realities. Shall I list them? 1. Whats really in it for us to join a B12 if we can’t benefit from their football revenue now? 7 years of not seeing $25M per year. How is this different than where we are now? 2. The college conference probably will look very different from today. Who says the B12 doesn’t renege/change their collective mind over a 7 year period. 3. Someone please explain to me how our football program competes in the B12? Again, flashback to losses against Michigan, Tennessee and Maryland. Do you all want to be the DePaul of the B12? We will be 3-9 or 4-8 this year with likely wins over Marymount, UMass and some other nothing school. 4. Who’s going to pay for a new stadium? The B12 won’t allow us to play in our embarrassment of a football stadium. Yormark is the smart one. He obtains the 2 best men’s and women’s basketball programs in the country in return for nothing. If we ever get an offer, I hope to hell someone here knows how to negotiate because no league deserves our brand/cache, without paying a premium.
Just a hunch, but being aligned with several other publically funded flagship universities seems better than a league almost exclusively comprised of smaller private Catholic schools.You don't know what ramp-up for football the Big 12 is/was proposing.
Your pro-Big 12 argument is primarily based on a massive revenue bump for basketball that may be a complete fantasy. I would love $15 million/year or $20MM or $500MM or whatever fantasy number people want to throw out, but there is no evidence we are getting that.
No one knows what the implications of the House settlement would be, making jumping at the first offer we get potentially a massive mistake. What happens if the elite academic schools bail on major sports? What happens if, as seems increasingly possible, football splits off from other sports? Committing to the Big 12 would have been a massive mistake under those circumstances.
UConn was ranked in Top 25 during 2009 or 2010 season.I agree with Alphasigko. And when was the Fieata Bowl? 10 or 15 years ago? I am 70 and never recall UConn being good top 20 or 25 at any point in my lifetime. So anyone who trots out that old trope, needs to stop.
I believe UConn's highest ranking in football was #12 nationally.UConn was ranked in Top 25 during 2009 or 2010 season.
You can check that off your lifetime list.
You’re welcome.