UConn, still awaiting word on Tyler Polley, mapping out potential transfers, recruits for next year | Page 3 | The Boneyard

UConn, still awaiting word on Tyler Polley, mapping out potential transfers, recruits for next year

8893

Curiouser
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,851
Reaction Score
96,512
My cynical translation of the article is Tyler hasn't been contacted by a school that he likes better than UConn so he will keep Hurley waiting until the last minute when he decides to return.
Or Hurley hasn’t been able to land a replacement so he’s keeping the door open for Polley but Polley doesn’t want to return if he’s going to be redundant.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,578
Reaction Score
16,671
Some of you guys overvalue the size of the paycheck playing European basketball. Outside of the top division you really don’t make much.

Polley isn’t good enough to play in Spain, Italy, Greece, or the Adriatic League’s top division. Financially, a masters degree will earn him more.
Undoubtedly, getting a masters is in his best interest. It will pay back over his entire life. But, if he really wants to play the sport he loves, he’ll have to make some real sacrifices... foreign environment, lower pay, etc.
 

HuskylnSC

North is a direction; South is a lifestyle
Joined
Mar 7, 2017
Messages
2,335
Reaction Score
11,837
Or Hurley hasn’t been able to land a replacement so he’s keeping the door open for Polley but Polley doesn’t want to return if he’s going to be redundant.
Polly doesn't bring enough to the table. He does shoot for a high percentage but he scores in clusters, some games a ton more games not enough. He defends well and occasionally rebounds. One more year of Polly will not provide growth in the team.
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
8,882
Reaction Score
37,222
If nothing else, it's a brilliant hedge by Hurley. We know for a fact that he's tried to land one or more transfers, but if says at the same time that he's not really into transfers he is covered in case he whiffs on all of them.
Thinking the same.. but who knows
 
Joined
May 15, 2019
Messages
1,251
Reaction Score
3,319
My cynical translation of the article is Tyler hasn't been contacted by a school that he likes better than UConn so he will keep Hurley waiting until the last minute when he decides to return.
I could be wrong, but I don't think that is how it works. You have to be in the portal before you are allowed to be contacted by other coaches. Is Tyler even in the portal?
 
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
1,707
Reaction Score
3,828
Article from Borges about many of the topics that we have been discussing here.

The next burgeoning question is if Tyler Polley, like Whaley, plans to return for a fifth and final season in Storrs. The 6-foot-9 forward is having a tough time making his decision, according to Adam Ross, who coached Polley for four years at The Sagemont School in Florida.

“Tyler is doing some real thinking on the topic,” Ross said in a text message, “is in regular contact with Coach (Dan) Hurley and will make a decision in the coming weeks.”



Alternate free access: UConn, still awaiting word on Tyler Polley, mapping out potential transfers, recruits for next year
Good informative article. Thanks for posting.
 
Joined
Jan 6, 2015
Messages
6,990
Reaction Score
56,838
My hopeful, but realistic outcomes.

1) Polley returns

2a) Kolek transfers in, takes a "redshirt" year (little promised PT, but still eligible and could play a bigger role if needed), OR
2b) a '22 reclass shooter, takes a "redshirt" year (little promised PT, but still eligible and could play a bigger role if needed.

21-22, just a depth chart, not married to these starting lineups

4: Whaley, Akok, Springs
3: Martin, Polley,
5: Sanogo, Johnson
2: Gaffney, Jackson/Hawkins, Kolek/'22 reclass
1: Cole, Diggins

22-23, just a depth chart, not married to these starting lineups.

4: Akok, Springs
3: Jackson, Floyd
5: Sanogo, Johnson
2: Hawkins, Kolek/'22 shooter
1: Diggins, Gaffney
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
4,111
Reaction Score
39,773
I’ve heard Polley will be in college next year, but tbd if it’s at uconn or not.
Well if he wants to start then he'll have to drop down to a mid major level school. But if he stays he'll still be getting over 20MPG. The team needs shooters, and he can shoot.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
719
Reaction Score
1,731
Polly doesn't bring enough to the table. He does shoot for a high percentage but he scores in clusters, some games a ton more games not enough. He defends well and occasionally rebounds. One more year of Polly will not provide growth in the team.
Well if he wants to start then he'll have to drop down to a mid major level school. But if he stays he'll still be getting over 20MPG. The team needs shooters, and he can shoot.
Let him go, he doesn't bring nothing to this team. Get a replacement for him !
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,508
Reaction Score
94,367
My hopeful, but realistic outcomes.

1) Polley returns

2a) Kolek transfers in, takes a "redshirt" year (little promised PT, but still eligible and could play a bigger role if needed), OR
2b) a '22 reclass shooter, takes a "redshirt" year (little promised PT, but still eligible and could play a bigger role if needed.

21-22, just a depth chart, not married to these starting lineups

4: Whaley, Akok, Springs
3: Martin, Polley,
5: Sanogo, Johnson
2: Gaffney, Jackson/Hawkins, Kolek/'22 reclass
1: Cole, Diggins

22-23, just a depth chart, not married to these starting lineups.

4: Akok, Springs
3: Jackson, Floyd
5: Sanogo, Johnson
2: Hawkins, Kolek/'22 shooter
1: Diggins, Gaffney

There's no way we're getting Kolek if our head coach hasn't even bothered to call him.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2019
Messages
910
Reaction Score
7,327
My hopeful, but realistic outcomes.

1) Polley returns

2a) Kolek transfers in, takes a "redshirt" year (little promised PT, but still eligible and could play a bigger role if needed), OR
2b) a '22 reclass shooter, takes a "redshirt" year (little promised PT, but still eligible and could play a bigger role if needed.

21-22, just a depth chart, not married to these starting lineups

4: Whaley, Akok, Springs
3: Martin, Polley,
5: Sanogo, Johnson
2: Gaffney, Jackson/Hawkins, Kolek/'22 reclass
1: Cole, Diggins

22-23, just a depth chart, not married to these starting lineups.

4: Akok, Springs
3: Jackson, Floyd
5: Sanogo, Johnson
2: Hawkins, Kolek/'22 shooter
1: Diggins, Gaffney
With the recent Borges article hinting at it and seeing how things are playing out, feels like a ‘22 reclass into the ‘21 class is a very realistic option. Depending on Polleys situation, still think they grab a guy in the transfer market there too but I suspect they’re working hard to get a ‘22 reclass kid and nabbing him before the recruitment blows up.

I have no clue if they’re still recruiting him but from what I’ve seen, I still like Jaylen Blakes and would love to add him. Kid is explosive and has serious range. Seems more of a combo guard then true SG and he’s a bit undersized but when you watch him play, he’s an impressive player.
 

dennismenace

ONE MORE CAST
Joined
Apr 19, 2015
Messages
3,008
Reaction Score
8,210
Taylor should not even be mentioned in the same sentence as Rashad
Agreed. Here's something to put this into perspective:
Rashad's performance in the NCAA tournament in his sophomore year. This is a performance of a conscienceless dagger thruster on the loose:

Sophomore[edit]​

In the 2004 season, Anderson finished as third leading scorer for NCAA champion Huskies with 11.2 ppg. He reached double figures in 19 total games on the season and was named to the NCAA Final Four All-Tournament Team after scoring 18 points vs. Georgia Tech in the Championship game and 14 points vs. Duke. In the NCAA Tournament he averaged 17.3 points and .488 from three-point range (21-of-43). His 21 threes set a UConn single-tournament record. Rashad scored 28 points in NCAA Elite Eight win over Alabama, matching the school-NCAA record of six three-pointers he set in First Round win over Vermont.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,578
Reaction Score
96,686
Let him go, he doesn't bring nothing to this team. Get a replacement for him !

Easy to say if you know you're getting a couple of shooters or Hawkins is ready from Day 1. If not then you're looking for big trouble without shooters on the team. You also have to figure he'll be a lot more healthy and more ready next year than last as well as working on things over the summer which will make him better for us in the coming year. He was pretty much only able to work on rehabbing his knee in order to play last summer, not really his game. Is he limited overall, yep he is. But do we have anyone on the team who can shoot it as well as him, no we don't. And DH isn't exactly ripping up the transfer portal.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
4,111
Reaction Score
39,773
Agreed. Here's something to put this into perspective:
Rashad's performance in the NCAA tournament in his sophomore year. This is a performance of a conscienceless dagger thruster on the loose:

Sophomore[edit]​

In the 2004 season, Anderson finished as third leading scorer for NCAA champion Huskies with 11.2 ppg. He reached double figures in 19 total games on the season and was named to the NCAA Final Four All-Tournament Team after scoring 18 points vs. Georgia Tech in the Championship game and 14 points vs. Duke. In the NCAA Tournament he averaged 17.3 points and .488 from three-point range (21-of-43). His 21 threes set a UConn single-tournament record. Rashad scored 28 points in NCAA Elite Eight win over Alabama, matching the school-NCAA record of six three-pointers he set in First Round win over Vermont.
Rashad also hit every big shot that he needed to hit. Including his daggers over Washington in 2006. In my eyes, he's on UConn's Mt. Rushmore of the most clutch players we've ever had.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
5,633
Reaction Score
24,806
I just said Hurley isn’t a transfer guy and was called crazy

Is that really true? I know thats what he says but 40% of our starting lineup this year were transfers. Feels a bit disingenuous to me. We have three ships to fill. There is no problem at all filling a few of them with transfers, especially 5th years.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
13,275
Reaction Score
88,596
Is that really true? I know thats what he says but 40% of our starting lineup this year were transfers. Feels a bit disingenuous to me. We have three ships to fill. There is no problem at all filling a few of them with transfers, especially 5th years.
It's taking his quote out of context by only using the first half of his sentence. If people provided the whole quote he said he doesn't expect to become Transfer U but they'd likely add 1-2 this offseason
 

Online statistics

Members online
90
Guests online
1,752
Total visitors
1,842

Forum statistics

Threads
156,871
Messages
4,068,459
Members
9,950
Latest member
Woody69


Top Bottom