It's not apples to oranges. If that's what you want to believe - okay. Believe what you want. You're seeing things much differently than me. But my point was clear when I spoke of Carrington. I spoke of +/- stats.
I asked the question and I can ask again differently- how do you think Carrington's +/- stats were for the game vs the other starters on her team? She was probably 2nd best other than the pg., in terms of +/-, right? Bottom-line was that she was a productive player. If you are going to knock her offense then apparently UCONN wasn't as tired as you suggest?
And who was the player Baylor went to and who scored the most late for Baylor? So my question was clear -- after the game was over -do you think Kim was satisfied that one of her top players was probably fresher late than the UCONN guards? That's what I also posted. DO you think Kim took solace knowing that she had one of her top players on the bench those important 3.5 minutes, instead of playing her? We've seen Geno take out Doty from the starting lineup in a big game, right? And we saw Kim starting Carrington in 2nd half.
And while you are making it a point to tell me about how you feel by putting in AM and you don’t want me to take it as heated criticism; I want to say my reply is the same back at you and here it is--
You and I have had complete disagreement on how the game should be played. I look at your view of the game (not a specific player) as totally wrong, --- correct? So the point that you wanted to bring in AM - and Geno didn't do it-- and I favor playing the best players as long as they can handle it-- what do you think I think of that move that you wanted to do (in which you are implying criticism in some manner)?
Auriemma plays the style I want to see. And IMO the style that you want to see is completely reckless. Even after UCONN won the game you seem willing to want to go with a different style while recognizing it might fail although we know the current style Geno has employed over the years has been incredibly successful. IMO that's off-the-charts reckless of you. I can see criticizing an offensive set, not calling a timeout, what defense to use, who you'd start in some manner, – but a philosophy that he has employed over the years and yet recklessly thinking that a lesser player is the answer to me is just so wrong.
And imo just as you have way over-exaggerated of CW's past deficiencies this season just as imo - you are way over-exaggerating the last 5 minutes too. One thing being tired but overall the team was nowhere near what you are exaggerating. There has to be excuses now why Paige misses shots vs a terrific defensive team? It had nothing to with being fouled a bit also by an aggressive team in which the officials were letting rough play go on as well?
wow. you feel better now Hoop? Thanks for bolding parts of your response - I'll do that same back to you in kind. I don't need you to keep reminding me that we don't agree on things. I'll remind you that
I already know this and as far as I am concerned, it is ok -
no problem that we disagree.
1. Carrington -
I've mentioned that for some silly reason Kim doesn't start Carrington. This implies that I disagree with a HOF coach who has 3 championships and won lots of games however...... I don't think we are allowed to have such an opinion are we? We we up by 5 when she came in. up by 2 when Kim was trying to get her in. Carrington played well early but really fell off late with a terrible shooting night. She was still moving well on defense. So to answer you Q on how I think Kim feels about not starting her: How the hell should I know how she feels? She could feel the way you think she should or she could feel that sitting her the first 3 minutes is still the best result for her team because she wouldn't have had the same production if she starts.
2. AM - You said: 'I favor playing the best players as long as they can handle it'. I got some news flash for ya Hoop:
I DO TOO!!!! You also said: 'yet recklessly thinking that a lesser player is the answer to me is just so wrong'. No no no Hoop!
Don't cheery pick my words! I'll say it again in big bold type just for you: I think that a lesser player
WHEN FRESH is better than a superior player
WHEN EXHAUSTED. This way your better players have something left at the end, especially playing a tough, strong, big and great defensive team like Baylor. Please take
ALL of my words and not just a few that fit you agenda!!
Everybody in the world thinks a better player is superior to a lesser player, all things equal.
I do know that with 7 minutes to go, we had a 9 pt lead at 64-55. We scored 5 pts the rest of the way (only 2 buckets, only one via half court offense, the other created by AE's block. Baylor scored 12. They kicked out butts the last 7 minutes of the game. Thank God they ran out of time! They looked like the fresher team which is expected considering their size and strength advantage.
So no,
I don't think playing AM for 8 minutes is reckless. In fact, I think it would have resulted in a more productive final 7 minutes (could not have been much worse) and the game may have not been as close as it was. Not because AM is the greatest player on the planet, but simply to get the starters a few minutes rest for the 4th quarter stretch run. I think many coaches would have done precisely that. AM was a starter and hit 3 threes the last game and played well on defense - she isn't exactly horrible and to play her is
NOT reckless. A fresh AM is better than an exhausted CW, PB or EW. Anybody knows that we played hard and tough the entire game, but were also very fortunate to come out of that game with a win.
We can agree to disagree and I'm fine with that.
3. You can say all you want about me exaggerating CW's defense earlier in the year, but
she even admitted in a recent interview that her defense needed to be better.
GA mentioned it as well and even benched her for a half earlier in the season and I don't think it was because she missed a shot or wasn't working on offense. GA has never once mentioned CW's defense in a positive light, until the BE tournament. I have mentioned CW's defensive resurgence numerous times since. I stand by my words (before and after CW's defensive resurgence).
We can agree to disagree and I'm fine with that.
4. I really don't get you implying that I'm criticizing a philosophy employed by GA. Did I say that he should play zone the entire game? Did I say his offense sucks and he needs to scrap it for a triangle and one? No I did not - that would be a philosophical difference Hoop.
It is you who is exaggerating. I said many times in the past and I only mention this because I believe this is what you are referring to, that I would give AG 8 minutes more a game and probably take those minutes from CW.
That is NOT a demotion for CW or even a promotion for AG. I just think CW would have been better with 30 minutes a game instead of 38. Keep in mind that
30 minutes is 75% of the game and lot of minutes. If you think that would ruin the season and is reckless, well I think you are, in your words: 'over-exaggerating'.
We can agree to disagree and I'm fine with that.
5. Last 5 minutes (actually 7):
You try to categorise things for maximum negative effect. I gave an observation on why PB was coming up short on all her shots in the last 5-6 minutes and your response is 'There has to be excuses now why Paige misses shots vs a terrific defensive team?'. Ok, if that is they way you see my post, then I guess everybody is looking for excuses when things don't go as planned.
No, I'm not looking for excuses. I acknowledged that Baylor has a great defense, saying that they are arguably the best defense in the nation. But PB also shredded them for 28 pts through 3 quarters and 3 minutes shooting 10-17 (60%) and 3-6 from 3 in the process. That is a heck of a game! She did exactly what I said she would do against this vaunted Baylor defense.
Then in the last 7 minutes, she couldn't get open, missed all her open and contested shots, went 0-5 whilst not having the energy to fight threw a screen, allowed a layup and was not being able to shake herself free from the defense - something she consistently did
UNTIL she simply ran out of gas at the end. She also completely forgot to set a screen for CW at the end (or maybe she was to run her man off the screen), either way, GA lost his mind on it. Was PB mentally tired at the end or was she spacing out when GA gave her the instructions in the timeout or does she just not have the mentally capacity to understand GA's instructions? I think mental exhaustion may have played a part, but who really knows. By the way, EW had issues too allowing Carrington to blow easily by her with 53 secs left to get to the line for FTs. I wonder if CW missing 3 straight FTs had something to do with exhaustion. Maybe, maybe not.....
Now as a comparison, AE, on the other hand, helped us tremendously with her defense down the stretch which led to 1 of our only 2 buckets we had in the last 7 minutes and I think the second block on Carrington was questionable, not to mention the close-out/block on Carrington at the end -
no doubt she was not exhausted and saved our season. Seems GA played AG a lot in this game, but I bet if he didn't and somehow we still win, you would argue that not playing AG was the
ONLY way to win because she is a lesser player and that is GA's philosophy and therefor there can be no disagreements with GA!
Certainly at minimum, some of our total lack of anything offensively in the last 7 minutes is due to PB, EW and CW being tired and to a much lesser extent the Baylor defense. Or do you really think it is only due to Baylor's defense? Hell no...We were on pace to
score 80 pts at the 7 minute mark of Q4 AND shooting
close to 50% from the field at that point. So that great defense wasn't exactly slowing us down...until the last 7 minutes when we ran out of gas....
PB was killing them throughout the game. She had nothing left at the end. But if you want to say poor execution of offense, 2-8 shooting and turnovers in the the final minutes was solely due to that great Baylor defense, you know the same defense that PB shredded for
28 pts earlier in the game on 60% shooting at the 7 minute mark, then so be it.
We can agree to disagree and I'm fine with that.
Finally, just because I disagree every now and then with GA, doesn't mean that I am automatically wrong and
doesn't mean that I disagree with 'a philosophy that he has employed over the years'. It means I disagree with a small part of his overall coaching philosophy...and yes, I know he has won a lot more championships and games than I have.