UConn-South Carolina postgame thread | Page 17 | The Boneyard

UConn-South Carolina postgame thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
2,657
Reaction Score
11,740
Without sounding like a Pollyanna, this game just confirmed that UConn can win against SC. UConn, playing to its strengths, will win. SC is a dominate team and if allowed to use its muscle, will win. Great game for women's basketball fans to watch.
I viewed today's game as a well-played game for SC; OK for UConn. In the playoffs, if the two teams play again, I don't expect:
-Edwards to only get 4 rebounds. All American quality game by her today but pushed out of position so many times. Credit SC but doubt it would happen again.
-Geno will not get a technical at a key time. Gave SC 3-5 points that turned out to be critical.
-UConn will not get (2) 5 second calls and one step in (i.e. by Aubrey) turnovers.
-Nika will have more than 4 assists. UConn will move throughout next game.
-UConn will have another 3-point shooter the next time. If Azzi, forecast but she and Lou will have big games. SC does not have two defenders that can shut both down at same time. I will not comment on the beating Lou took. Suspect Geno will make sure one way or another her getting hammered shows up in fouls.
-Geno will not let UConn's big guards get caught under the basket helping out. UConn was beaten under the boards but killed on the long rebounds. UConn's guards need to release to go after long rebounds. 1-2 more rebounds could have been the difference.

This is a very different UConn than I have seen in several years. Virtually all of the players can go one on one and create their own shots if needed. Boston and the other SC bigs are excellent but I don't view their defense as strong enough to keep a hot shooting UC team from winning if/when Azzi and Caroline come back.
Very astute. Just adding that Geno admitted in the postgame presser that one on one play was the game plan. Even Nika got involved.
 

SVCBeercats

Meglepetés Előadó
Joined
Feb 14, 2017
Messages
4,923
Reaction Score
29,393
Geno didn't help them at all with his substitutes
Right now Geno has exactly 5 basketball healthy players who can compete in a game with South Carolina. The two substitutes he needs for March are Azzi and Caroline. Ines, Amari, and Ayanna are not qualified subs for such games. Ayanna - 14 min. 0 pts. 0 rebs. 0 asst. 1 stl. 1 blk. 2 to. pf 3
 

HuskyNan

You Know Who
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
25,875
Reaction Score
213,281
Right now Geno has exactly 5 basketball healthy players who can compete in a game with South Carolina. The two substitutes he needs for March are Azzi and Caroline. Ines, Amari, and Ayanna are not qualified subs for such games. Ayanna - 14 min. 0 pts. 0 rebs. 0 asst. 1 stl. 1 blk. 2 to. pf 3
Ayanna played well today. She bodied up Boston and boxed her out pretty wel. Ayanna also caused a couple tie ups and she defended well. None of that shows up in the box score
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2021
Messages
51
Reaction Score
245
Could not agree more. I stopped watching the NBA decades ago because it’s no longer basketball but indoor rugby. If the NCAA doesn’t address the issue of freedom of movement and start calling fouls when defenders grab offensive players, especially when they don’t possess the ball, I’ll stop watching the collegiate women. What was played today is not basketball.
I feel the same way.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2022
Messages
449
Reaction Score
2,354
Only one official missed the handoff - the official administering the inbound pass. The other two have other areas of responsibility to watch. If all three are watching the inbound pass, no one is paying attention to what is happening on the baseline, in the paint or at the 3pt line.

That being said, the inbounding official clearly missed it, and I guarantee he'll regret it when viewing the film. He and I worked high school games together back in the day. I had, and still have, great respect for his body of work. He's a class act, a stand-up guy, and will be haunted by it.
My question is technical, and you're one who can answer it. Is this not a "reviewable" call?
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2021
Messages
333
Reaction Score
2,484
Ayanna played well today. She bodied up Boston and boxed her out pretty wel. Ayanna also caused a couple tie ups and she defended well. None of that shows up in the box score
Both your post and the one you are replying to are true. I have been a big fan of Patterson but right now, despite the positives you point out well, she is not ready for a game at this level except for emergency. A month from now she could be; she's close (but that was true 5-6 weeks ago).
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,968
Reaction Score
33,438
Ayanna played well today. She bodied up Boston and boxed her out pretty wel. Ayanna also caused a couple tie ups and she defended well. None of that shows up in the box score
To be fair, one of the TOs was trying to pass to someone (Aubrey) who should have been cutting to the basket. My take.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2022
Messages
6,501
Reaction Score
38,668
Wasn't it a relief not to see a lot of flopping! These are both real teams who play real basketball. Not cheap shot artists. Sure, it was rough at times, but other than the missed call on the handoff, I don't think the whistles made a difference.

Now, about that handoff....
 

donalddoowop

Who put the Bop in the Bop Shoo Bop?
Joined
Oct 5, 2015
Messages
5,460
Reaction Score
19,667
Geno didn’t have enough time outs to sub in every other possession
When the foul was committed the clock would stop. Sub then. Then, after UConn got the ball, sub on the next dead ball. It could have worked at least twice. As for cohenzone, who went in after players fouled out?
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2020
Messages
658
Reaction Score
2,591
Wasn't it a relief not to see a lot of flopping! These are both real teams who play real basketball. Not cheap shot artists. Sure, it was rough at times, but other than the missed call on the handoff, I don't think the whistles made a difference.

Now, about that handoff....
Totally disagree. In a close game like this, the failure to call even two obvious offensive fouls on Boston and calling them blocks, was huge. Then add the fouls that were uncalled when Lou was mugged and the handoff, and that could easily be the game.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2022
Messages
6,501
Reaction Score
38,668
Totally disagree. In a close game like this, the failure to call even two obvious offensive fouls on Boston and calling them blocks, was huge. Then add the fouls that were uncalled when Lou was mugged and the handoff, and that could easily be the game.
Totally different question. I'm not talking about actual fouls. I'm talking about fake fouls -- hence the term flopping. I was relieved the game was free of this baloney. Neither team was interested in stealing an advantage that way.
 
Joined
May 5, 2021
Messages
678
Reaction Score
3,038
One of the craziest facts about today’s game is that UConn shot 52% against the nation’s best defense and still lost the game.

To be clear, that’s not a dig at UConn. Can’t remember the last time somebody shot 45% against SC. Pretty incredible offense today.
 

MSGRET

MSG, US Army Retired
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
6,628
Reaction Score
37,292
And according to "everyone" (well, not the BY), SC was supposed to win. So there was a decent amount of pressure on them before the game, and as it was close for a majority of the game, more pressure. For UConn, it would have been nice to win, but now they have a bevy of stuff to improve upon, regardless of who is playing.
There were more Boneyarder's favoring SC in their Prognostications for this game then the one's favoring UConn.
 

MSGRET

MSG, US Army Retired
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
6,628
Reaction Score
37,292
I watched the replay and tried to count all of the holds and hip checks on Lou, the best that I could come up with was 22 times, 7 each in the first two quarters, with 5 in the third and 3 in the fourth. So maybe Geno's T did help some, but it would have been better if he had done it sometime in the 2nd quarter.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2011
Messages
7,516
Reaction Score
24,532
Like the rest of the Yard, I am very proud of this team. Came pretty close to pulling off the win today. But I was impressed with how the team, especially Aaliyah, did not back down from South Carolina. The team had a nice game plan on the defensive end and offensively, they went at South Carolina. Aaliyah had one of those "I am coming at you" games. She made a huge statement in this game. I am proud of the team.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2019
Messages
1,325
Reaction Score
9,339
She had a really strong offensive game but there are two ends of the court when you hoop, her complete lack of presence on the defensive boards was a big factor in the game.
So for those who dislike the truth, Edwards getting only 2 defensive boards had no affect on the game? Why is objective truth such an anathema to some? I thought this was a discussion board, I could care less about the “dislike” reactions, that is childish IMO without some type of counter argument or opinion, because frankly, I thought it was a huge factor in the loss; as I think her points were huge in keeping Uconn in the game. In my mind both are very true. Some of you seem so used to Uconn only winning, all objectivity is lost, and blaming refs is the only point worth attributing to any and all close games and losses.
 

HuskyNan

You Know Who
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
25,875
Reaction Score
213,281
Both your post and the one you are replying to are true. I have been a big fan of Patterson but right now, despite the positives you point out well, she is not ready for a game at this level except for emergency. A month from now she could be; she's close (but that was true 5-6 weeks ago).
Aaliyah had foul trouble. It was (kind of) an emergency
 

HuskyNan

You Know Who
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
25,875
Reaction Score
213,281
So for those who dislike the truth, Edwards getting only 2 defensive boards had no affect on the game? Why is objective truth such an anathema to some? I thought this was a discussion board, I could care less about the “dislike” reactions, that is childish IMO without some type of counter argument or opinion, because frankly, I thought it was a huge factor in the loss; as I think her points were huge in keeping Uconn in the game. In my mind both are very true. Some of you seem so used to Uconn only winning, all objectivity is lost, and blaming refs is the only point worth attributing to any and all close games and losses.
It’s not that you’re making your point. It’s that a huge chunk of UConn fans that had been expecting the Huskies to be blown out were delighted and proud to see their team stand toe to toe with the defending national champions for the entire 40 minutes. The fans were reveling in how well the team played.

And then the people that feel the need to pick apart every facet of every game come along to tell us how bad someone was or point out all the errors or let us know where someone failed to live up to that fan’s expectations. All of the air suddenly goes out of the room and we’re unable to like the way our team played without being told how unrealistic we are

The people that complain they “can’t “ criticize are the ones that “won’t” let those of us who were enjoying our team have even a sliver of satisfaction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
61
Guests online
2,223
Total visitors
2,284

Forum statistics

Threads
159,526
Messages
4,194,829
Members
10,066
Latest member
bardira


.
Top Bottom