- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 22,661
- Reaction Score
- 8,668
Ruelas should also be given a scholarship, if he hadn't already.Would appear there is a quick fix available to staff (w/ a vig) if this was about future playing time
Ruelas should also be given a scholarship, if he hadn't already.Would appear there is a quick fix available to staff (w/ a vig) if this was about future playing time
Agree. I like this idea a lot, particularly if that transfer fee could be used for NIL compensation. Devils in the details, though. How effective it would be will be based upon what the dollar amount is.Yes! A transfer fee paid to the losing school. This could actually be really healthy for college football.
Maybe Ruelas changes his mind and gets some $$$ his way.Ruelas should also be given a scholarship, if he hadn't already.
Yeah, this one was such an odd situation. Why did they not play Ruelas?Mixed feelings here... he was great 2 years ago, then hurt and Ruelas played even better last year. Not sure why Ruelas lost out to him this year, and even worse, now both are gone.
Not when Deion recruits over him. More than any other position group, backup offensive linemen are invisible. The goal is to get 5 cohesive starters and play them as close to 100% as possible. Subs generally get significant playing time only when the starter is hurt or the lead is large. Linemen that start at "lower" schools should, and hopefully do, consider that when thinking about a transfer.Good for him. That’s definitely more eyeballs on him than with us. Can’t hate that move
Kicker is the least of our worries.
I do not get that impression. Do you have data? I know that things were moving in that direction for regular employees but I didn't realize they had got that far. And I am not sure if there is a difference between At Will states and Just Cause states. Anyway, a moot point if the players are independent suppliers doing gig work under contract. The contracts can say anything that the parties agree to.Though non competes are illegal in most states so I doubt they would do that.
If we tank the season we get a better draft pickAre you serious
They are the only way we score
He did play a few times during the year. Don’t remember if it was all in the same game. At least he could reach the endzone on kickoffs.Yeah, this one was such an odd situation. Why did they not play Ruelas?
I would not be surprised if he did not opt out.Although nothing should surprise us about college football anymore, a little surprised at McFadden. Clearly, he was not the same after the ACL injury, yet the staff stuck with him this season. Ruelas goes in the portal, leaving McFadden as the only kicker on the roster, meaning he certainly had the inside track on the starting job next year, but he opted out. Odd. Who knows - maybe he wants to be closer to home in Texas Maybe HCJM had a convo with him regarding his future?
Yeah, I suppose I should say why did they not play him more. He kicked 4 FGs and 3 XPs too.He did play a few times during the year. Don’t remember if it was all in the same game. At least he could reach the endzone on kickoffs.
The contracts are generally tailored to the player with the better the player the more leverage the kid has to dictate terms.Somewhat naive question regarding NIL. Is there a possibility that players get their payout contingent on playing in a bowl game should a team qualify for one? All these defections before the bowls, which used to be celebrated as a season's success, are now a bit diminished as kids opt out (to prepare [save themselves] for the NFL draft). I wonder if the boosters/NIL collectives start to put performance expectations on the payouts.
I might be missing the point you are trying to make but why would this staff care - neither Ruelas or McFadden were recruited by this staff? Hell, Ruelas as a Hometown Husky would be an easy sell to the fan base.Probably because they didn't want to admit the non-scholarship kicker was better than the kicker on scholarship
Colorado has grabbed 6 portal linemen so far this year so someone is not going to start.Not when Deion recruits over him. More than any other position group, backup offensive linemen are invisible. The goal is to get 5 cohesive starters and play them as close to 100% as possible. Subs generally get significant playing time only when the starter is hurt or the lead is large. Linemen that start at "lower" schools should, and hopefully do, consider that when thinking about a transfer.
The kicker offered from Louisiana-Monroe had better stats this year than any of the UConn kickers over the past few years.Hopefully, Ruelas will now come back. Great kicker.
Surprised Shearer was so successful at Miami. I've been thinking he's the problem because I've thought special teams have looked atrocious for two years now, but maybe he needs one more shot...In 2023, McFadden ranked #96 in kickoff distance at 59.9 yards per kick and ranked below the top 100 in FG % made at 53.8% (#100 was at 68.2%). And, he made 87% of his PATs which is below the top 100 as well (#100 was at 96%). Based on my eye, not all of the kicking problems this year were due to the kicker and, he didn't look like he fully recovered from injury.
In 2021, he ranked below the top 100 in kickoff distance at 57.9 yards per kick (#100 was at 59.8 yards) and he ranked #77 in FG % made at 70.5%. But, he did hit 100% of his PATs.
For his UConn career, he was 5 of 14 on FGs 40 yards or greater.
Special teams, except for punting, were a real problem this year. Short kickoffs, missed FGs, missed X-points,... Maybe we need a reset.
UConn's ST coach had a good 3 year track record at Miami (OH) so I think he can do a good job at UConn (and he is a UConn grad). His kickers stats over his 3 years there:
FG% = 81.4%
PAT% = 95.3%
Non-competes are most definitely not illegal (or even unenforceable) in most states. Pending whatever the feds to with the current proposed regs to make them illegal in most instances nationwide.I do not get that impression. Do you have data? I know that things were moving in that direction for regular employees but I didn't realize they had got that far. And I am not sure if there is a difference between At Will states and Just Cause states. Anyway, a moot point if the players are independent suppliers doing gig work under contract. The contracts can say anything that the parties agree to.