- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 9,331
- Reaction Score
- 31,102
This is everything
Seemed appropriate.
This is everything
Unless Bugsy is an 'actual graphic designer' you are doing exactly what UConn did.My initial reaction was what @BugsyCT already did - beat me to the punch
Also this is what UConn gets for not paying actual graphic designers to do work....
Unless Bugsy is an 'actual graphic designer' you are doing exactly what UConn did.
Students can and should design the logo for the student section, the vetting was the flaw. Learning experiences for the students and the school may be helpful in the long run, no need to spend money to fix trial and error, re-trial.
Was it trying to skimp on costs or was it just applying its usual half-assed, ill-conceived, and poorly executed methodology to another non-issue?I did exactly what UConn did?
The AD was trying to skimp on costs here and got bit.
Was it trying to skimp on costs or was it just applying its usual half-assed, ill-conceived, and poorly executed methodology to another non-issue?
I am not sure what you are trying to say (as usual)
I dont think this is a huge deal or anything- it's only slightly embarrassing. The AD didn't want to pay, and they ended up w/ stolen clip art. Whatever.
I am not sure what you are trying to say (as usual)
I dont think this is a huge deal or anything- it's only slightly embarrassing. The AD didn't want to pay, and they ended up w/ stolen clip art. Whatever.
I don't think there was an affirmative decision to outsource logo design in order to save costs. I do think that athletic department's recent history of press releases and retractions shortly thereafter show a pattern of bad ideas, which are poorly vetted and poorly implemented. Anyone of them is "embarrassing" and not a "huge deal" but the pattern is troubling.
Hope that helped.
Well, maybe someone from NC State.I think someone definitely made a decision to have a student design the logo, and the reason was almost certainly because they wouldn't have to pay a designer.
I agree it's troubling - but I don't think anyone outside of the fan base noticed.
Obedient Bitches didn't have the same ring to it...
Unless Bugsy is an 'actual graphic designer' you are doing exactly what UConn did.
Hats and neckerchiefs too I think.I'll let google know...
Seriously, there's color associated with Cub ranks now? Is it just the badge or is it something more?
Also I don’t think a group of Huskies is a team. A group of individuals on an athletic endeavor is a team.I'm pretty sure a group of Huskies is referred to as a "team" as in a "team of sleds dogs". I think the Dog Team or something similar would be appropriate and unique for our student section and the reference to "team" would be very meaningful.
Hats I remember. I'm not sure if neckerchiefs changed but it was a while ago. Good merchandising to change things up with every rank, I guess.Hats and neckerchiefs too I think.
Well, maybe someone from NC State.
I believe Bob Dylan termed that "the folk process"The funniest part is someone pointed out the NC State Logo used clip art. just google Wolfpack clip art and its the 3rd image that comes up. Some kid at NC State probably stole that too.
View attachment 46508
I think someone definitely made a decision to have a student design the logo, and the reason was almost certainly because they wouldn't have to pay a designer.
I agree it's troubling - but I don't think anyone outside of the fan base noticed.
^^^People noticed
^^^People noticed
Yeah, been avoiding r/cbb since this happened. There's this post and the original announcement post which also generated a lot of traffic.
It appears they literally just swiped NC State's alternative logo. Really sloppy by the AD and they probably should change this.
North Carolina State Wolfpack Alternate Logo - NCAA Division I (n-r) (NCAA n-r) - Chris Creamer's Sports Logos Page - SportsLogos.Net